Evaluates the accuracy of predicted optical flow fields on spherical 360° video frames, measuring both endpoint displacement and angular deviation. It also assesses egocentric activity recognition performance using these flow features to test rotation-invariant representation learning. Use when the user wants to benchmark on FLOW360, EGOK360, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports EPE.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill flow360-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Flow360 Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-flow360-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: flow360-eval
description: Evaluates the accuracy of predicted optical flow fields on spherical 360° video frames, measuring both endpoint displacement and angular deviation. It also assesses egocentric activity recognition performance using these flow features to test rotation-invariant representation learning. Use when the user wants to benchmark on FLOW360, EGOK360, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports EPE.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2301.11880
bibtex_key: duan2023flow360
confidence: high
---
# flow360-eval
> Optical Flow Estimation in 360$^\circ$ Videos: Dataset, Model and Application — Bin Duan et al. (2023) (arXiv:2301.11880, 2023)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates the accuracy of predicted optical flow fields on spherical 360° video frames, measuring both endpoint displacement and angular deviation. It also assesses egocentric activity recognition performance using these flow features to test rotation-invariant representation learning.
## Datasets
- **FLOW360** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **EGOK360** — total ?; splits: train (-1), test (-1)
## Metrics
- `EPE` **(primary)** — range: other (pixels)
- End Point Error: the mean Euclidean distance between predicted and ground truth flow vectors across N pixels. Formula: EPE = (1/N) * sum(||f_pred - f_gt||_2). Lower is better.
- `AE` — range: other (degrees)
- Angular Error: the mean angle between predicted and ground truth flow vectors. Formula: AE = acos((u_e*u_r + v_e*v_r + 1) / (sqrt(u_r^2+v_r^2+1) * sqrt(u_e^2+v_e^2+1))). Lower is better.
- `EPEd` — range: other (pixels)
- Distortion-aware EPE: penalizes flow error in distorted regions using a distortion density map d. Formula: EPEd = (1/N) * sum(||f_pred - f_gt||_2 / (1 - d)). Lower is better.
- `AEd` — range: other (degrees)
- Distortion-aware AE: penalizes angular error in distorted regions. Formula: AEd = (1/N) * sum(AE / (1 - d)). Lower is better.
- `Top-1 accuracy` — range: percent
- Percentage of correctly classified egocentric activity labels. Computed as mean(pred_label == gt_label) over the test set.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Paired 360° video frames (or sequences of 10 frames) with optional rotational augmentations (pitch, roll, yaw) applied during training; raw frames during evaluation.
**Output**: Per-pixel optical flow vectors (u, v) for flow estimation; class labels for activity recognition.
## Scoring recipe
```python
def compute_metrics(f_pred, f_gt, d, labels_pred, labels_gt):
u_e, v_e = f_pred
u_r, v_r = f_gt
epe = mean(sqrt((u_e - u_r)**2 + (v_e - v_r)**2))
ae = mean(acos((u_e*u_r + v_e*v_r + 1) / (sqrt(u_r**2+v_r**2+1) * sqrt(u_e**2+v_e**2+1))))
eped = mean(sqrt((u_e - u_r)**2 + (v_e - v_r)**2) / (1 - d))
aed = mean(ae / (1 - d))
# Speed-based sub-metrics: average over pixels where s=sqrt(u^2+v^2) in [0,5), [5,10), [10,20), [20,inf)
accuracy = mean(labels_pred == labels_gt)
return epe, ae, eped, aed, accuracy
```
## Common pitfalls
- Distortion-aware metrics (EPEd/AEd) require the distortion density map d, which the authors remap to [0.5, 1.0) to prevent metric inflation and maintain scale.
- Results are frequently reported as averages over specific speed ranges (s<5, s<10, s<20, s>=20) rather than a single global average, which can mask performance in high-motion regions.
- Normal EPE can appear comparable between baselines, but distortion-aware metrics reveal significant failures in distorted areas (e.g., RAFT+KTN predicts shallow flow fields).
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> We evaluate our method based on 2D-raw flow. Besides, using EPE (End Point Error in Eq. (10)), i.e., Euclidean distance between the predicted flow and ground truth flow, as a single evaluation metric, we incorporate AE (Angular Error) as shown in Eq. (9) as the second measure. To explain the error in the omnidirectional setting, we introduce a distortion-aware measure called EPEd as in Eq. (11). This metric penalizes the error in the distorted area based on the distortion density map.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{duan2023flow360,
title={Optical Flow Estimation in 360$^\circ$ Videos: Dataset, Model and Application},
author={Bin Duan et al. (2023)},
year={2023},
note={arXiv:2301.11880}
}
```
- arXiv: 2301.11880
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!