Evaluates the translation quality of Neural Machine Translation (NMT) models trained on filtered pseudo-parallel corpora. It measures how well few-shot Quality Estimation (QE) based corpus filtering improves MT performance across low-resource and mid-resource language pairs compared to baselines and other filtering methods. Use when the user wants to benchmark on FLORES101, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports BLEU.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill flores101-mt-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Flores101 Mt Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-flores101-mt-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: flores101-mt-eval
description: Evaluates the translation quality of Neural Machine Translation (NMT) models trained on filtered pseudo-parallel corpora. It measures how well few-shot Quality Estimation (QE) based corpus filtering improves MT performance across low-resource and mid-resource language pairs compared to baselines and other filtering methods. Use when the user wants to benchmark on FLORES101, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports BLEU.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2306.03507
bibtex_key: batheja2023little
confidence: high
---
# flores101-mt-eval
> "A Little is Enough": Few-Shot Quality Estimation based Corpus Filtering improves Machine Translation — Batheja et al. (2023) (arXiv:2306.03507, 2023)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates the translation quality of Neural Machine Translation (NMT) models trained on filtered pseudo-parallel corpora. It measures how well few-shot Quality Estimation (QE) based corpus filtering improves MT performance across low-resource and mid-resource language pairs compared to baselines and other filtering methods.
## Datasets
- **FLORES101** — total 1012; splits: test (1012)
## Metrics
- `BLEU` **(primary)** — range: percent
- Standard sentence-level BLEU score computed over the FLORES101 test set. It measures n-gram precision with a brevity penalty to penalize overly short translations.
- `Pearson Correlation` — range: [-1, 1]
- Pairwise Pearson correlation coefficient computed between human-annotated Domain Adaptation (DA) quality scores and model-predicted quality scores on the QE test set.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Source sentence in the source language (e.g., English, Marathi, Chinese, Hindi, or Bengali).
**Output**: Translated sentence in the target language.
## Scoring recipe
```python
def compute_bleu(predictions, references):
# predictions: list of translated strings
# references: list of reference strings (one per prediction)
bleu_score = sacrebleu.corpus_bleu(predictions, [references])
return bleu_score.score
```
## Common pitfalls
- BLEU scores are reported separately for each translation direction (e.g., En→Mr vs Mr→En) and should not be averaged without explicit instruction.
- The FLORES101 test set contains exactly 1,012 sentence pairs per language pair, not the full 101 languages.
- QE filtering thresholds differ by language pair (-0.5 for En-Mr, -0.4 for Zh-En, 0 for Hi-Bn), so filtered corpus sizes vary significantly across methods and are not directly comparable.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> For evaluation, we use the FLORES 101 test set which contains 1,012 sentence pairs for each language pair. Table 3: BLEU scores of En→Mr and Mr→En NMT models on FLORES101 test data.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{batheja2023little,
title={"A Little is Enough": Few-Shot Quality Estimation based Corpus Filtering improves Machine Translation},
author={Batheja et al. (2023)},
year={2023},
note={arXiv:2306.03507}
}
```
- arXiv: 2306.03507
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!