Tests the model's capability to predict multiple facial attributes (e.g., gender, hairstyle) from a single facial image as a multilabel classification task. It probes fine-grained visual feature extraction and attribute-level alignment. Use when the user wants to benchmark on CelebA, LFWA, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports Average Precision (AP).
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Facial Attribute Prediction Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-facial-attribute-prediction-eval)
---
name: facial-attribute-prediction-eval
description: Tests the model's capability to predict multiple facial attributes (e.g., gender, hairstyle) from a single facial image as a multilabel classification task. It probes fine-grained visual feature extraction and attribute-level alignment. Use when the user wants to benchmark on CelebA, LFWA, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports Average Precision (AP).
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2407.08515
bibtex_key: [REDACTED]
confidence: high
---
# facial-attribute-prediction-eval
> 15M Multimodal Facial Image-Text Dataset — Dawei Dai et al. (2024) (arXiv:2407.08515, 2024)
## What this evaluates
Tests the model's capability to predict multiple facial attributes (e.g., gender, hairstyle) from a single facial image as a multilabel classification task. It probes fine-grained visual feature extraction and attribute-level alignment.
## Datasets
- **CelebA** — total 182732; splits: train (162770), test (19962)
- **LFWA** — total ?; splits: train (6263), test (-1)
## Metrics
- `Average Precision (AP)` **(primary)** — range: percent
- Mean Average Precision across all facial attributes. Computes the area under the precision-recall curve for each label and averages them across the attribute set.
## Input / output format
**Input**: A single facial image.
**Output**: A set of predicted binary labels for each facial attribute.
## Scoring recipe
```python
def compute_ap(predictions, gold):
aps = []
for pred_labels, true_labels in zip(predictions, gold):
tp = 0
precisions, recalls = [], []
for i, pred in enumerate(pred_labels):
if pred == true_labels[i]: tp += 1
precisions.append(tp / (i + 1))
recalls.append(tp / sum(true_labels))
aps.append(np.trapz(precisions, recalls))
return np.mean(aps) * 100
```
## Common pitfalls
- Evaluates across different training data scales (1%, 2%/10%, 100%), so results are not directly comparable without noting the subset size.
- Uses multiple feature aggregation strategies (CLS, mean, max pooling) combined via layer normalization before the final linear layer, which can inflate performance if not standardized.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> Average precision (AP) was used as the evaluation index.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{dai2024facecaption,
title={15M Multimodal Facial Image-Text Dataset},
author={Dawei Dai et al. (2024)},
year={2024},
note={arXiv:2407.08515}
}
```
- arXiv: 2407.08515