This benchmark evaluates embodied mobile manipulation agents in open environments, testing their ability to execute long-horizon, language-conditioned tasks that require interleaved high-level planning and low-level continuous navigation/manipulation. It specifically probes reasoning fidelity, execution success, adaptability to failures, and path efficiency compared to expert trajectories. Use when the user wants to benchmark on EMMOE-100, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports PLWSR.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill emmo-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Emmo Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-emmo-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: emmo-eval
description: This benchmark evaluates embodied mobile manipulation agents in open environments, testing their ability to execute long-horizon, language-conditioned tasks that require interleaved high-level planning and low-level continuous navigation/manipulation. It specifically probes reasoning fidelity, execution success, adaptability to failures, and path efficiency compared to expert trajectories. Use when the user wants to benchmark on EMMOE-100, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports PLWSR.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2503.08604
bibtex_key: li2025emmoe
confidence: high
---
# emmo-eval
> EMMOE: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Embodied Mobile Manipulation in Open Environments — Dongping Li et al. (2025) (arXiv:2503.08604, 2025)
## What this evaluates
This benchmark evaluates embodied mobile manipulation agents in open environments, testing their ability to execute long-horizon, language-conditioned tasks that require interleaved high-level planning and low-level continuous navigation/manipulation. It specifically probes reasoning fidelity, execution success, adaptability to failures, and path efficiency compared to expert trajectories.
## Datasets
- **EMMOE-100** — total 100; splits: train (90), test (10)
## Metrics
- `PLWSR` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]
- Path Length Weighted Success Rate. Calculated as SR × (length of successful trajectory) / max(length of expert trajectory, length of successful trajectory). It measures the ability gap between the agent and the expert specifically on successful trajectories.
- `SR` — range: [0, 1] or percent
- Success Rate. The proportion of tasks completed successfully out of total execution attempts.
- `TP` — range: [0, 1] or percent
- Task Progress metric (defined in Section 2.3 of the full paper). Tracks overall task advancement or step efficiency.
- `SRR` — range: [0, 1] or percent
- Success Re-planning Rate. Reflects the model's ability to adapt to environments and adjust from failure using feedback information.
- `SER` — range: [0, 1] or percent
- Success End Rate. Reflects the model's ability to correctly determine when a task is completed and should be terminated.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Language-conditioned task instructions, object names, background/environmental state information, and execution history/feedback from previous steps.
**Output**: Sequential action commands (e.g., 'Go to', 'Pick', 'Place', 'Open', 'Close', 'End'), low-level model selection choices, and re-planning outputs upon failure.
## Scoring recipe
```python
def compute_emmoe_metrics(predictions, gold, max_steps=20, runs=3):
success_flags = []
traj_lengths = []
for run_preds in predictions:
completed = check_task_completion(run_preds, gold)
success_flags.append(completed)
traj_lengths.append(len(run_preds))
sr = sum(success_flags) / len(success_flags)
successful_trajs = [l for l, s in zip(traj_lengths, success_flags) if s]
expert_len = gold['expert_trajectory_length']
avg_succ_len = sum(successful_trajs) / len(successful_trajs) if successful_trajs else 0
plwsr = sr * (avg_succ_len / max(expert_len, avg_succ_len))
# TP, SRR, SER computed per Sec 2.3 definitions
return {'SR': sr, 'PLWSR': plwsr, 'TP': ..., 'SRR': ..., 'SER': ...}
```
## Common pitfalls
- DPO alignment significantly improves training split performance but degrades generalization on the test split, particularly causing a sharp drop in SRR.
- High subtask success rates do not guarantee high overall task success; models often fail long-horizon tasks due to context forgetting or hallucination despite completing individual steps.
- Evaluation averages results over 3 runs per task with a strict 20-step limit, which heavily penalizes inefficient planners and can mask sporadic successes.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> In addition to SR, TP, SER and SRR introduced in Section[2.3], we also choose Path Length Weighted SR (PLWSR)*[[27]]* as one of our evaluation metrics. PLWSR is defined as SR×(length of successful trajectory) / $max$(length of expert trajectory, length of successful trajectory) and measures the ability gap between the agent and the expert in successful trajectories. All tasks in EMMOE-100 will be used for evaluation, and the remaining ten untrained tasks will serve as our test set. Each task is executed three times with a maximum step limit of 20 each time, the average execution results will be used for the final calculation.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{li2025emmoe,
title={EMMOE: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Embodied Mobile Manipulation in Open Environments},
author={Dongping Li et al. (2025)},
year={2025},
note={arXiv:2503.08604}
}
```
- arXiv: 2503.08604
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!