Evaluates the video understanding and reasoning capabilities of multimodal language models after reinforcement learning training. It probes performance across general video comprehension, long-context video understanding, complex reasoning, and STEM knowledge tasks using a standardized greedy decoding protocol. Use when the user wants to benchmark on Video-MME, MVBench, TempCompass, LVBench, LongVideoBench, MLVU, Video-Holmes, MMVU, Video-MMMU, VideoMathQA, or asks about evaluating this task....
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill easyvideor1-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Easyvideor1 Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-easyvideor1-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: easyvideor1-eval
description: Evaluates the video understanding and reasoning capabilities of multimodal language models after reinforcement learning training. It probes performance across general video comprehension, long-context video understanding, complex reasoning, and STEM knowledge tasks using a standardized greedy decoding protocol. Use when the user wants to benchmark on Video-MME, MVBench, TempCompass, LVBench, LongVideoBench, MLVU, Video-Holmes, MMVU, Video-MMMU, VideoMathQA, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports accuracy.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2604.16893
bibtex_key: qin2026easyvideor1
confidence: high
---
# easyvideor1-eval
> EasyVideoR1: Easier RL for Video Understanding — Chuanyu Qin et al. (2026) (arXiv:2604.16893, 2026)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates the video understanding and reasoning capabilities of multimodal language models after reinforcement learning training. It probes performance across general video comprehension, long-context video understanding, complex reasoning, and STEM knowledge tasks using a standardized greedy decoding protocol.
## Datasets
- **Video-MME, MVBench, TempCompass, LVBench, LongVideoBench, MLVU, Video-Holmes, MMVU, Video-MMMU, VideoMathQA** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
## Metrics
- `accuracy` **(primary)** — range: percent
- Percentage of correctly answered questions across all benchmark instances. Calculated as (number of correct predictions / total number of predictions) * 100.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Video sequences sampled at 2 FPS with a maximum of 128 frames and a per-frame pixel budget of 262,144, paired with text prompts. Image inputs use a separate pixel budget of 1,048,576.
**Output**: Free-form text responses generated via greedy decoding.
## Scoring recipe
```python
correct = 0
total = 0
for pred, gold in zip(predictions, gold_labels):
if pred.strip() == gold.strip():
correct += 1
total += 1
return (correct / total) * 100
```
## Common pitfalls
- Using non-greedy decoding during evaluation, as the protocol explicitly mandates greedy decoding for all benchmarks.
- Ignoring the specified video preprocessing parameters (2 FPS sampling, max 128 frames, 262,144 pixels/frame), which significantly affect model performance and throughput comparisons.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> EasyVideoR1 training improves the average accuracy from 62.1 to 64.4 (+2.3), demonstrating that the framework’s end-to-end pipeline—from data loading through reward computation to policy update—functions correctly and effectively.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{qin2026easyvideor1,
title={EasyVideoR1: Easier RL for Video Understanding},
author={Chuanyu Qin et al. (2026)},
year={2026},
note={arXiv:2604.16893}
}
```
- arXiv: 2604.16893

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!