Evaluates the zero-shot transfer capability of language-image pre-trained models across image-text retrieval, semantic segmentation, image classification, and vision-language reasoning tasks. Use when the user wants to benchmark on ImageNet, MSCOCO, Flickr30K, ADE20K-150, VOC-20, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports R@K, Top-1 accuracy.
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Dreamlip Zero Shot Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-dreamlip-zero-shot-eval)
---
name: dreamlip-zero-shot-eval
description: Evaluates the zero-shot transfer capability of language-image pre-trained models across image-text retrieval, semantic segmentation, image classification, and vision-language reasoning tasks. Use when the user wants to benchmark on ImageNet, MSCOCO, Flickr30K, ADE20K-150, VOC-20, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports R@K, Top-1 accuracy.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2403.17007
bibtex_key: [REDACTED]
confidence: high
---
# dreamlip-zero-shot-eval
> DreamLIP: Language-Image Pre-training with Long Captions — Kecheng Zheng et al. (arXiv:2403.17007, 2024)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates the zero-shot transfer capability of language-image pre-trained models across image-text retrieval, semantic segmentation, image classification, and vision-language reasoning tasks.
## Datasets
- **ImageNet** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **MSCOCO** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **Flickr30K** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **ADE20K-150** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **VOC-20** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
## Metrics
- `R@K` **(primary)** — range: percent
- Recall at top-K retrieved items. Computed by ranking texts/images by similarity score and checking if the ground truth appears in the top-K.
- `Top-1 accuracy` **(primary)** — range: percent
- Percentage of images correctly classified by selecting the class label with the highest cosine similarity to the image embedding.
- `mIOU` — range: percent
- Mean Intersection over Union across all semantic classes, measuring segmentation mask overlap with ground truth.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Image resized to 224x224. Text truncated or padded to 77 tokens. For zero-shot classification, text inputs are predefined prompts containing class label names.
**Output**: Class label prediction (classification), ranked list of retrieved items (retrieval), pixel-wise class labels (segmentation).
## Scoring recipe
```python
def evaluate_zero_shot(image, text_prompts, gold_labels):
img_emb = model.encode_image(image)
txt_embs = model.encode_text(text_prompts)
sim = (img_emb @ txt_embs.T) / temperature
pred = text_prompts[torch.argmax(sim, dim=1)]
return (pred == gold_labels).float().mean()
def evaluate_retrieval(img_embs, txt_embs, gold_indices, k):
sim_matrix = img_embs @ txt_embs.T
ranks = torch.argsort(sim_matrix, descending=True)
recall = (ranks[:, :k].argmax(dim=1) == gold_indices).float().mean()
return recall
```
## Common pitfalls
- Using custom prompt templates instead of CLIP's predefined class-label prompts changes zero-shot results significantly.
- Text inputs must be strictly truncated/padded to 77 tokens to match the pre-trained text encoder's capacity.
- Evaluating semantic segmentation requires fine-tuning on COCO-stuff, not just zero-shot inference.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> Following CLIP, we select 11 visual recognition datasets under the zero-shot setting... The same zero-shot classification protocol is applied following [47], which uses predefined prompts as text inputs. We use R@K to report the recall of top-K retrieval items. Top-1 accuracy is used for evaluation.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{zheng2024dreamlip,
title={DreamLIP: Language-Image Pre-training with Long Captions},
author={Kecheng Zheng et al.},
year={2024},
note={arXiv:2403.17007}
}
```
- arXiv: 2403.17007