Evaluates end-to-end and cascaded named entity recognition from Arabic speech. It probes a model's ability to jointly transcribe spoken Arabic and predict fine-grained entity types (21 categories) using BIO-style tagging, as well as extract entity spans and values. Use when the user wants to benchmark on CV-18 NER, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports CoER.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill cv-18-ner-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Cv 18 Ner Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-cv-18-ner-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: cv-18-ner-eval
description: Evaluates end-to-end and cascaded named entity recognition from Arabic speech. It probes a model's ability to jointly transcribe spoken Arabic and predict fine-grained entity types (21 categories) using BIO-style tagging, as well as extract entity spans and values. Use when the user wants to benchmark on CV-18 NER, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports CoER.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2604.02209
bibtex_key: saidi2026cv18ner
confidence: high
---
# cv-18-ner-eval
> CV-18 NER: Augmented Common Voice for Named Entity Recognition from Arabic Speech — Saidi et al. (2026) (arXiv:2604.02209, 2026)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates end-to-end and cascaded named entity recognition from Arabic speech. It probes a model's ability to jointly transcribe spoken Arabic and predict fine-grained entity types (21 categories) using BIO-style tagging, as well as extract entity spans and values.
## Datasets
- **CV-18 NER** — total ?; splits: train (-1), val (-1), test (-1)
## Metrics
- `CoER` **(primary)** — range: percent
- Concept Error Rate. Computed as (S+D+I)/N, where S, D, I are substitutions, deletions, and insertions, and N is the number of reference entity labels. Evaluates correctness of entity labels (e.g., B-PERS, I-ORG) independently of lexical content.
- `CVER` — range: percent
- Concept-Value Error Rate. Computed as (S+D+I)/N over tag-value pairs. Evaluates both entity type and entity span by comparing extracted pairs from predicted and reference transcripts.
- `WER` — range: percent
- Word Error Rate. Computed as (S+D+I)/N over words, after removing special entity tokens from model outputs.
- `Micro-averaged F1-score` — range: percent
- Standard micro-averaged F1 computed over token-level BIO predictions for text-based NER systems.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Audio signals resampled to 16 kHz for speech models; normalized text transcriptions (punctuation/diacritics removed, Eastern numerals transliterated) for text-based NER models.
**Output**: For speech models: concatenated transcription with entity tags as single atomic special tokens (e.g., B-PERS, I-ORG). For text models: BIO-style token-level labels aligned with input sentences.
## Scoring recipe
```python
def compute_error_rate(pred_tokens, ref_tokens):
S, D, I = edit_distance_operations(pred_tokens, ref_tokens)
N = len(ref_tokens)
return (S + D + I) / N
def compute_coer(pred_tags, ref_tags):
return compute_error_rate(pred_tags, ref_tags)
def compute_cver(pred_pairs, ref_pairs):
return compute_error_rate(pred_pairs, ref_pairs)
# WER is computed on word tokens after stripping entity tags.
# F1 is computed via standard micro-averaging over token labels.
```
## Common pitfalls
- Transcription errors in ASR directly degrade downstream NER performance, but lower WER does not guarantee better CoER/CVER due to differences in error types.
- Entity tags are treated as single atomic tokens in the vocabulary; they must be removed before computing WER to avoid skewing results.
- Performance drops sharply for low-frequency entity types (e.g., PRODUCT, LAW) compared to high-frequency ones (e.g., LANGUAGE, GPE).
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> Named entity recognition performance is evaluated using Concept Error Rate (CoER) and Concept-Value Error Rate (CVER), which are adapted from spoken language understanding evaluation. WER, CoER, and CVER follow the standard error-rate formulation: Error Rate = (S+D+I)/N, where S, D, and I denote substitutions, deletions, and insertions, and N is the number of reference units. CoER evaluates the correctness of entity labels only (e.g., B-PERS, I-ORG), independently of the lexical content. CVER evaluates both entity type and entity span by comparing tag–value pairs extracted from the annotated transcripts.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{saidi2026cv18ner,
title={CV-18 NER: Augmented Common Voice for Named Entity Recognition from Arabic Speech},
author={Saidi et al. (2026)},
year={2026},
note={arXiv:2604.02209}
}
```
- arXiv: 2604.02209
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!