Evaluates zero-shot conversational voice cloning systems on their ability to generate natural, expressive speech that matches a target speaker's timbre and spontaneous style without prior training on the target speaker. It measures pronunciation accuracy, speaker similarity, and subjective qualities like naturalness, quality, and spontaneous style. Use when the user wants to benchmark on HQ-Conversations / CoVoC Test Prompts, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports FS.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill covocheval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Covocheval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-covocheval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: covocheval
description: Evaluates zero-shot conversational voice cloning systems on their ability to generate natural, expressive speech that matches a target speaker's timbre and spontaneous style without prior training on the target speaker. It measures pronunciation accuracy, speaker similarity, and subjective qualities like naturalness, quality, and spontaneous style. Use when the user wants to benchmark on HQ-Conversations / CoVoC Test Prompts, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports FS.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2411.00064
bibtex_key: xia2024covocheval
confidence: high
---
# covocheval
> The ISCSLP 2024 Conversational Voice Clone (CoVoC) Challenge: Tasks, Results and Findings — Xia et al. (2024) (arXiv:2411.00064, 2024)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates zero-shot conversational voice cloning systems on their ability to generate natural, expressive speech that matches a target speaker's timbre and spontaneous style without prior training on the target speaker. It measures pronunciation accuracy, speaker similarity, and subjective qualities like naturalness, quality, and spontaneous style.
## Datasets
- **HQ-Conversations / CoVoC Test Prompts** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
## Metrics
- `CER` — range: percent
- Character Error Rate computed between the ground truth transcript and the transcript recognized by an external ASR model (paraformer-large) from the synthesized audio.
- `SIM` — range: [-1, 1]
- Cosine similarity between speaker embeddings extracted from the reference speech and the generated speech using the Resemblyzer tool.
- `SN` — range: [1, 5]
- Mean Opinion Score (1-5) for speech naturalness, assessing pronunciation correctness, ambiguity, tone changes, and pause naturalness.
- `SQ` — range: [1, 5]
- Mean Opinion Score (1-5) for speech quality, assessing electronic distortion and voice clarity.
- `SS` — range: [1, 5]
- Mean Opinion Score (1-5) for speaker similarity, assessing timbre and speaking style match to the target speaker.
- `SSS` — range: [1, 5]
- Mean Opinion Score (1-5) for speech spontaneous style, assessing colloquial words, laughter, non-rhythmic pauses, stress, and rhythm.
- `FS` **(primary)** — range: [1, 5]
- Final Score computed as the unweighted average of the four MOS scores: FS = 0.25×SN + 0.25×SQ + 0.25×SS + 0.25×SSS.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Reference audio clip (target speaker) and target text transcript.
**Output**: Synthesized audio waveform matching the target text in the target speaker's voice.
## Scoring recipe
```python
def compute_metrics(reference_audio, predicted_audio, gold_transcript):
# Objective
cer = compute_cer(gold_transcript, asr_model(predicted_audio))
sim = cosine_similarity(resemblyzer_embed(reference_audio), resemblyzer_embed(predicted_audio))
# Subjective (averaged across 10 raters)
sn, sq, ss, sss = [rater_score(sample) for rater_score in raters]
fs = 0.25 * sn + 0.25 * sq + 0.25 * ss + 0.25 * sss
return {"CER": cer, "SIM": sim, "SN": sn, "SQ": sq, "SS": ss, "SSS": sss, "FS": fs}
```
## Common pitfalls
- CER requires an external ASR model to transcribe the synthesized audio before computing error; it is not a direct string-to-string comparison.
- All audio samples must be resampled to 16 kHz before objective metric computation.
- The Final Score (FS) is a simple unweighted average of the four MOS aspects, despite the formula notation implying a weighted sum.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> The objective evaluation consisted of two aspects: pronunciation accuracy and timbre similarity. We employ Character Error Rate (CER) and cosine similarity for evaluation: Character Error Rate: CER is computed between the ground truth transcript and the recognized transcript. We use an open-source paraformer-large model to recognize the synthesized speech into the corresponding transcription. Speaker Similarity (SIM): We employ the Resemblyzer tool to extract speaker embedding and compute the cosine similarity between the reference speech and generated speech.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{xia2024covocheval,
title={The ISCSLP 2024 Conversational Voice Clone (CoVoC) Challenge: Tasks, Results and Findings},
author={Xia et al. (2024)},
year={2024},
note={arXiv:2411.00064}
}
```
- arXiv: 2411.00064
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!