Evaluates a model's ability to determine whether two code snippets share the same semantics or to retrieve relevant code snippets from a repository. It probes semantic code similarity and code retrieval capabilities. Use when the user wants to benchmark on BigCloneBench, POJ-104, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports Overall.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill clone-detection-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Clone Detection Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-clone-detection-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: clone-detection-eval
description: Evaluates a model's ability to determine whether two code snippets share the same semantics or to retrieve relevant code snippets from a repository. It probes semantic code similarity and code retrieval capabilities. Use when the user wants to benchmark on BigCloneBench, POJ-104, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports Overall.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2102.04664
bibtex_key: lu2021codexglue
confidence: high
---
# clone-detection-eval
> CodeXGLUE: A Machine Learning Benchmark Dataset for Code Understanding and Generation — Lu et al. (2021) (arXiv:2102.04664, 2021)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates a model's ability to determine whether two code snippets share the same semantics or to retrieve relevant code snippets from a repository. It probes semantic code similarity and code retrieval capabilities.
## Datasets
- **BigCloneBench** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **POJ-104** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
## Metrics
- `F1` — range: [0, 1]
- Harmonic mean of precision and recall for binary classification of code pair similarity.
- `MAP` — range: [0, 1]
- Mean Average Precision for retrieving 499 code snippets.
- `Overall` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]
- Average of F1 (BigCloneBench) and MAP (POJ-104) scores.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Pairs of code snippets (BigCloneBench) or a query code snippet with a candidate pool (POJ-104).
**Output**: Binary label (same/different semantics) or ranked list of retrieved code snippets.
## Scoring recipe
```python
For BigCloneBench: compute F1 on binary predictions.
For POJ-104: compute MAP over retrieved candidates.
Overall = (F1 + MAP) / 2
```
## Common pitfalls
- Models often ignore code structure (ASTs, data flow) which significantly impacts similarity measurement.
- POJ-104 retrieval task requires ranking 499 candidates, not just binary classification.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> The task of the BigCloneBench dataset is formulated as a binary classification to predict whether a given pair of codes has the same semantics, with the F1 score used as the evaluation metric. The task of the POJ-104 dataset aims to retrieve 499 codes for a given code from the development/test set for validation/testing, with the Mean Average Precision (MAP) as the evaluation metric. The overall score of the clone detection task is the average value of F1 and MAP scores.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{lu2021codexglue,
title={CodeXGLUE: A Machine Learning Benchmark Dataset for Code Understanding and Generation},
author={Lu et al. (2021)},
year={2021},
note={arXiv:2102.04664}
}
```
- arXiv: 2102.04664
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!