Evaluates image classification performance under significant domain shift between synthetic (CIFAR-10) and real-world/downsampled (ImageNet) sources. Probes model robustness to distributional bias and class-level statistical divergence across training and test domains. Use when the user wants to benchmark on CINIC-10, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports Test Error.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill cinic-10-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Cinic 10 Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-cinic-10-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: cinic-10-eval
description: Evaluates image classification performance under significant domain shift between synthetic (CIFAR-10) and real-world/downsampled (ImageNet) sources. Probes model robustness to distributional bias and class-level statistical divergence across training and test domains. Use when the user wants to benchmark on CINIC-10, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports Test Error.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 1810.03505
bibtex_key: darlow2018cinic10
confidence: high
---
# cinic-10-eval
> CINIC-10 is not ImageNet or CIFAR-10 — Darlow et al. (2018) (arXiv:1810.03505, 2018)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates image classification performance under significant domain shift between synthetic (CIFAR-10) and real-world/downsampled (ImageNet) sources. Probes model robustness to distributional bias and class-level statistical divergence across training and test domains.
## Datasets
- **CINIC-10** — total 270000; splits: train (-1), val (-1), test (-1); repo https://github.com/BayesWatch/cinic-10
## Metrics
- `Test Error` **(primary)** — range: percent
- Computed as 1 minus top-1 accuracy. The paper reports the mean and standard deviation across multiple experimental runs.
## Input / output format
**Input**: 32×32 RGB images with corresponding class labels from 10 categories.
**Output**: Predicted class label (or class probabilities) for each image.
## Scoring recipe
```python
def compute_test_error(predictions, gold_labels):
correct = sum(1 for p, g in zip(predictions, gold_labels) if p == g)
accuracy = correct / len(gold_labels)
return (1 - accuracy) * 100 # Returns percentage
```
## Common pitfalls
- Models may exploit synthetic artifacts present in the downsampled ImageNet images rather than learning robust features.
- The domain shift between CIFAR-10 and ImageNet causes distributional bias that standard data augmentation may not fully mitigate.
- Reporting only mean test error without confidence intervals or multiple seeds can mask high variance in domain adaptation performance.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> Table 1: CINIC-10 benchmarks.
<table><tr><td>Model</td><td>No. Parameters</td><td>Test Error</td></tr>...
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{darlow2018cinic10,
title={CINIC-10 is not ImageNet or CIFAR-10},
author={Darlow et al. (2018)},
year={2018},
note={arXiv:1810.03505}
}
```
- arXiv: 1810.03505
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!