Evaluates a video representation's sensitivity to temporal direction by distinguishing between temporally opposite actions (e.g., opening vs. closing a door). Also tests general action recognition capability via linear probing on standard benchmarks. Use when the user wants to benchmark on Something-Something v2, EPIC-Kitchens, Charades, Kinetics-400, UCF-101, HMDB-51, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports Chiral Accuracy.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill chiral-action-recognition-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Chiral Action Recognition Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-chiral-action-recognition-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: chiral-action-recognition-eval
description: Evaluates a video representation's sensitivity to temporal direction by distinguishing between temporally opposite actions (e.g., opening vs. closing a door). Also tests general action recognition capability via linear probing on standard benchmarks. Use when the user wants to benchmark on Something-Something v2, EPIC-Kitchens, Charades, Kinetics-400, UCF-101, HMDB-51, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports Chiral Accuracy.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2509.08502
bibtex_key: bagad2025chirality
confidence: high
---
# chiral-action-recognition-eval
> Chirality in Action: Time-Aware Video Representation Learning by Latent Straightening — Bagad et al. (2025) (arXiv:2509.08502, 2025)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates a video representation's sensitivity to temporal direction by distinguishing between temporally opposite actions (e.g., opening vs. closing a door). Also tests general action recognition capability via linear probing on standard benchmarks.
## Datasets
- **Something-Something v2** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **EPIC-Kitchens** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **Charades** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **Kinetics-400** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **UCF-101** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **HMDB-51** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
## Metrics
- `Chiral Accuracy` **(primary)** — range: percent
- Percentage of correctly classified chiral action pairs by a linear classifier trained on video descriptors.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Video clips sampled at T=16 frames linearly. Per-frame features extracted from an image encoder and concatenated or processed into a single video descriptor.
**Output**: Predicted class label for the chiral action pair or standard action class.
## Scoring recipe
```python
def compute_accuracy(predictions, gold_labels):
correct = sum(1 for p, g in zip(predictions, gold_labels) if p == g)
return correct / len(gold_labels) * 100
```
## Common pitfalls
- Naively concatenating per-frame features yields bulky descriptors that may be impractical for large-scale indexing, despite competitive performance.
- Average pooling over space and time can lose temporal sensitivity compared to average pooling over space and concatenating over time.
- Transformer-based models with a CLS token should be handled carefully (use CLS or average pool tokens), as treating them differently affects descriptor dimensionality.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> From the results shown in Table 2, we observe that the proposed LiFT features achieve the best performance on SSv2, EPIC and Charade, while being compact (d=768). ... Chiral Accuracy ↑
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{bagad2025chirality,
title={Chirality in Action: Time-Aware Video Representation Learning by Latent Straightening},
author={Bagad et al. (2025)},
year={2025},
note={arXiv:2509.08502}
}
```
- arXiv: 2509.08502
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!