Evaluates a chest X-ray vision-language foundation model across zero-shot classification, cross-modal retrieval, and adapted downstream tasks (classification, segmentation, report generation). It specifically probes data and compute efficiency, as well as the model's ability to represent long-tailed thoracic diseases without aggressive scaling. Use when the user wants to benchmark on SIIM-PTX, Pneumonia2017, TBX11K, CheXpert, MIMIC-CXR, ChestX-ray14, VinDr-CXR, VinDr-PCXR, or asks about evalu...
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill chexficient-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Chexficient Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-chexficient-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: chexficient-eval
description: Evaluates a chest X-ray vision-language foundation model across zero-shot classification, cross-modal retrieval, and adapted downstream tasks (classification, segmentation, report generation). It specifically probes data and compute efficiency, as well as the model's ability to represent long-tailed thoracic diseases without aggressive scaling. Use when the user wants to benchmark on SIIM-PTX, Pneumonia2017, TBX11K, CheXpert, MIMIC-CXR, ChestX-ray14, VinDr-CXR, VinDr-PCXR, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports AUROC.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2602.22843
bibtex_key: wang2026chexficient
confidence: high
---
# chexficient-eval
> A data- and compute-efficient chest X-ray foundation model beyond aggressive scaling — Chong Wang et al. (2026) (arXiv:2602.22843, 2026)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates a chest X-ray vision-language foundation model across zero-shot classification, cross-modal retrieval, and adapted downstream tasks (classification, segmentation, report generation). It specifically probes data and compute efficiency, as well as the model's ability to represent long-tailed thoracic diseases without aggressive scaling.
## Datasets
- **SIIM-PTX** — total 1372; splits: test (1372)
- **Pneumonia2017** — total 624; splits: test (624)
- **TBX11K** — total 1800; splits: test (1800)
- **CheXpert** — total 500; splits: test (500)
- **MIMIC-CXR** — total 3082; splits: test (3082)
- **ChestX-ray14** — total 25596; splits: test (25596)
- **VinDr-CXR** — total 3000; splits: test (3000)
- **VinDr-PCXR** — total 1397; splits: test (1397)
## Metrics
- `AUROC` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]
- Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; measures the probability that a randomly chosen positive instance is ranked higher than a negative instance. Reported as macro-average for multi-label tasks.
- `Recall@1` — range: [0, 1]
- Fraction of queries where the correct paired image or report is retrieved within the top-1 result.
- `Dice score` — range: [0, 1]
- 2 * |A ∩ B| / (|A| + |B|), measuring overlap between predicted and ground-truth segmentation masks.
- `RadGraph` — range: percent
- Standard radiology report generation metric that evaluates clinical concept matching between generated and reference reports.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Chest X-ray images paired with radiology reports. For zero-shot tasks: image + class description prompt (classification) or image/report as query (retrieval). For downstream tasks: image for classification/segmentation; image + reference report for generation.
**Output**: Classification labels (binary or multi-label), retrieved report/image, segmentation mask, or generated radiology report.
## Scoring recipe
```python
def compute_metrics(preds, gold):
# AUROC (macro-average for multi-label)
auroc_scores = [roc_auc_score(gold[:, i], preds[:, i]) for i in range(num_classes)]
auroc = np.mean(auroc_scores)
# Recall@1
recall_at_1 = np.mean([1 if p == g else 0 for p, g in zip(preds, gold)])
# Dice
dice = 2 * np.sum(pred_mask * gold_mask) / (np.sum(pred_mask) + np.sum(gold_mask))
return {'AUROC': auroc, 'Recall@1': recall_at_1, 'Dice': dice}
```
## Common pitfalls
- Confusing zero-shot evaluation (no weight updates) with adapted downstream fine-tuning (linear probing or head fine-tuning).
- Reporting single-label AUROC instead of macro-averaged AUROC for multi-disease benchmarks like CheXpert or VinDr-CXR.
- Combining Findings and Impressions sections for cross-modal retrieval without reporting section-specific retrieval performance.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> The area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC), Recall@1, Dice score, and standard radiology report generation metrics (e.g., RadGraph) are utilized for evaluating the task performance of these models.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{wang2026chexficient,
title={A data- and compute-efficient chest X-ray foundation model beyond aggressive scaling},
author={Chong Wang et al. (2026)},
year={2026},
note={arXiv:2602.22843}
}
```
- arXiv: 2602.22843
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!