Evaluates the effectiveness of attribute-neutralization models in removing demographic bias (sex and age) from chest X-ray images while preserving diagnostic utility for 15 disease findings. It probes the trade-off between demographic leakage suppression and clinical performance across varying edit intensities. Use when the user wants to benchmark on ChestX-ray14, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports AI-Judge AUC.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill chestxray14-bias-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Chestxray14 Bias Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-chestxray14-bias-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: chestxray14-bias-eval
description: Evaluates the effectiveness of attribute-neutralization models in removing demographic bias (sex and age) from chest X-ray images while preserving diagnostic utility for 15 disease findings. It probes the trade-off between demographic leakage suppression and clinical performance across varying edit intensities. Use when the user wants to benchmark on ChestX-ray14, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports AI-Judge AUC.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2601.15490
bibtex_key: solomon2026hybrid
confidence: high
---
# chestxray14-bias-eval
> Hybrid Vision Transformer_GAN Attribute Neutralizer for Mitigating Bias in Chest X_Ray Diagnosis — Jobeal Solomon, Ali Mohammed Mansoor Alsahag, Seyed Sahand Mohammadi Ziabari (2026) (arXiv:2601.15490, 2026)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates the effectiveness of attribute-neutralization models in removing demographic bias (sex and age) from chest X-ray images while preserving diagnostic utility for 15 disease findings. It probes the trade-off between demographic leakage suppression and clinical performance across varying edit intensities.
## Datasets
- **ChestX-ray14** — total ?; splits: test (1000)
## Metrics
- `AI-Judge AUC` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]
- Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve computed between the ground-truth demographic attribute (sex or age) and the AI-Judge's predicted probability on the neutralized image. Measures attribute leakage.
- `Macro ROC-AUC` — range: [0, 1]
- Mean of the ROC-AUC scores computed independently for each of the 15 disease findings. Measures overall diagnostic performance on neutralized images.
- `Worst-case subgroup AUC` — range: [0, 1]
- Minimum ROC-AUC across demographic subgroups (e.g., male/female, <60/≥60) for each disease finding, then median across findings. Measures fairness and subgroup performance.
- `SSIM` — range: [0, 1]
- Structural Similarity Index measuring pixel-level similarity between original and neutralized images. Used to quantify the magnitude of image edits.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Chest X-ray radiographs annotated with patient sex, age, and 15 disease findings. Images are processed through attribute neutralizers at varying edit intensities ($\alpha$ from 0.0 to 1.0).
**Output**: Neutralized chest X-ray images, AI-Judge predictions (probability of sex/age), and disease diagnosis predictions (15 binary findings).
## Scoring recipe
```python
def compute_metrics(original_img, neutralized_img, ai_judge, diagnosis_model, y_true_attr, y_true_disease):
y_pred_attr = ai_judge.predict(neutralized_img)
y_pred_disease = diagnosis_model.predict(neutralized_img)
# Leakage
leakage_auc = roc_auc_score(y_true_attr, y_pred_attr)
# Diagnosis
macro_auc = np.mean([roc_auc_score(y_true_disease[:, i], y_pred_disease[:, i]) for i in range(15)])
# Fairness
subgroup_aucs = [roc_auc_score(y_true_disease, y_pred_disease) for group in demographic_groups]
worst_auc = min(subgroup_aucs)
return leakage_auc, macro_auc, worst_auc
```
## Common pitfalls
- Confusing edit-intensity parameter $\alpha$ with model capability; higher $\alpha$ does not linearly improve neutrality and can collapse diagnostic performance.
- Overlooking class imbalance when interpreting per-finding ROC-AUC distributions, which can mask significant performance drops on rare findings.
- Comparing CNN and ViT neutralizers without noting the CNN baseline showed almost no leakage reduction across all $\alpha$ levels, making direct $\alpha$-sweep comparisons misleading.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> Leakage was assessed at three $\alpha$-levels (0.0, 0.5, 1.0) across three generator variants. Table 2 shows that at the turning-point edit ($\alpha=0.5$), the ViT neutralizer lowers the AI-Judge’s AUC by $\geq 0.15$ relative to both Hu et al.’s U-Net and our own CNN retrain, while the CNN variant hardly changes.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{solomon2026hybrid,
title={Hybrid Vision Transformer_GAN Attribute Neutralizer for Mitigating Bias in Chest X_Ray Diagnosis},
author={Jobeal Solomon, Ali Mohammed Mansoor Alsahag, Seyed Sahand Mohammadi Ziabari (2026)},
year={2026},
note={arXiv:2601.15490}
}
```
- arXiv: 2601.15490
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!