Skip to content
Back to skills

Brats2017 Eval

ASecurity

Probes 3D brain tumor segmentation capability across multiple MRI sequences, evaluating boundary accuracy and volumetric overlap for hierarchical tumor subregions. Use when the user wants to benchmark on BraTS 2017, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports Dice score.

  • 3 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added September 11, 2026
researchpythongo

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 11, 2026

npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill brats2017-eval --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Brats2017 Eval?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Brats2017 Eval
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/qhjqhj00-brats2017-eval/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-brats2017-eval)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: brats2017-eval
description: Probes 3D brain tumor segmentation capability across multiple MRI sequences, evaluating boundary accuracy and volumetric overlap for hierarchical tumor subregions. Use when the user wants to benchmark on BraTS 2017, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports Dice score.
metadata:
  skill_kind: dataset_eval
  source_arxiv: 1709.00382
  bibtex_key: [REDACTED]
  confidence: high
---

# brats2017-eval

> Automatic Brain Tumor Segmentation using Cascaded Anisotropic Convolutional Neural Networks — Wang et al. (2017) (arXiv:1709.00382, 2017)

## What this evaluates

Probes 3D brain tumor segmentation capability across multiple MRI sequences, evaluating boundary accuracy and volumetric overlap for hierarchical tumor subregions.

## Datasets

- **BraTS 2017** — total 477; splits: train (285), val (46), test (146)

## Metrics

- `Dice score` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]
  - 2 * |A ∩ B| / (|A| + |B|), measuring volumetric overlap between predicted and ground truth segmentation masks.
- `Hausdorff distance` — range: mm
  - Maximum of the distances from any point in one set to the closest point in the other set, measuring boundary discrepancy in millimeters.

## Input / output format

**Input**: Four co-registered MRI sequences (T1, T1c, T2, FLAIR) per patient, skull-stripped and resampled to isotropic 1mm³ resolution.

**Output**: Three binary segmentation masks per patient corresponding to whole tumor (WT), tumor core (TC), and enhancing tumor core (ET).

## Scoring recipe

```python
def dice_score(pred, gt):
    intersection = np.sum(pred * gt)
    return 2.0 * intersection / (np.sum(pred) + np.sum(gt))

def hausdorff_distance(pred, gt):
    from scipy.ndimage import distance_transform_edt
    dist_pred = distance_transform_edt(1 - pred)
    dist_gt = distance_transform_edt(1 - gt)
    hd = max(np.max(dist_pred[gt == 1]), np.max(dist_gt[pred == 1]))
    return hd
```

## Common pitfalls

- Metrics are computed by the official BraTS server, not locally.
- Hausdorff distance is highly sensitive to outliers, leading to high standard deviations.
- Subregions are hierarchical: ET ⊂ TC ⊂ WT.

## Evidence (verbatim from paper)

> We uploaded the segmentation results obtained by the experimental algorithms to the BraTS 2017 server, and the server provided quantitative evaluations including Dice score and Hausdorff distance compared with the ground truth.

## Citation

```bibtex
@misc{wang2017automatic,
  title={Automatic Brain Tumor Segmentation using Cascaded Anisotropic Convolutional Neural Networks},
  author={Wang et al. (2017)},
  year={2017},
  note={arXiv:1709.00382}
}
```

- arXiv: 1709.00382

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.