Skip to content
Back to skills

Brace Main Eval

ASecurity

Evaluates the ability of audio-language models to align audio with captions and distinguish caption quality across different generation sources (human-human, human-machine, machine-machine). It probes fine-grained semantic and syntactic alignment capabilities under realistic captioning conditions. Use when the user wants to benchmark on BRACE-Main, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports F1-score.

  • 3 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added September 11, 2026
researchpythongogit

Works with

  • cli

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 11, 2026

npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill brace-main-eval --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Brace Main Eval?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Brace Main Eval
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/qhjqhj00-brace-main-eval/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-brace-main-eval)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: brace-main-eval
description: Evaluates the ability of audio-language models to align audio with captions and distinguish caption quality across different generation sources (human-human, human-machine, machine-machine). It probes fine-grained semantic and syntactic alignment capabilities under realistic captioning conditions. Use when the user wants to benchmark on BRACE-Main, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports F1-score.
metadata:
  skill_kind: dataset_eval
  source_arxiv: 2512.10403
  bibtex_key: guo2025brace
  confidence: high
---

# brace-main-eval

> BRACE: A Benchmark for Robust Audio Caption Quality Evaluation — Guo et al. (2025) (arXiv:2512.10403, 2025)

## What this evaluates

Evaluates the ability of audio-language models to align audio with captions and distinguish caption quality across different generation sources (human-human, human-machine, machine-machine). It probes fine-grained semantic and syntactic alignment capabilities under realistic captioning conditions.

## Datasets

- **BRACE-Main** — total ?; splits: test (-1); repo https://github.com/HychTus/BRACE_Evaluation

## Metrics

- `F1-score` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]
  - Harmonic mean of precision and recall for caption quality alignment or preference prediction between caption pairs.

## Input / output format

**Input**: Audio clip paired with two captions (Human-Human, Human-Machine, or Machine-Machine pairs) for quality comparison or alignment scoring.

**Output**: Model outputs a similarity score, preference choice, or quality rating for the caption pair.

## Scoring recipe

```python
def compute_f1(predictions, gold):
    tp = sum(1 for p, g in zip(predictions, gold) if p == 1 and g == 1)
    fp = sum(1 for p, g in zip(predictions, gold) if p == 1 and g == 0)
    fn = sum(1 for p, g in zip(predictions, gold) if p == 0 and g == 1)
    precision = tp / (tp + fp) if (tp + fp) > 0 else 0
    recall = tp / (tp + fn) if (tp + fn) > 0 else 0
    return 2 * precision * recall / (precision + recall) if (precision + recall) > 0 else 0
```

## Common pitfalls

- CLAP models struggle with fine-grained Human-Human and Machine-Machine caption comparisons, often failing to identify subtle quality differences.
- Position bias in LALMs causes them to favor caption_0 or caption_1 regardless of actual content, especially under complex prompts.

## Evidence (verbatim from paper)

> On BRACE-Main, the best-performing model LAION-CLAP achieves an F1-score of 70.01, while others range from ~55 to 70 depending on architecture and subset.

## Citation

```bibtex
@misc{guo2025brace,
  title={BRACE: A Benchmark for Robust Audio Caption Quality Evaluation},
  author={Guo et al. (2025)},
  year={2025},
  note={arXiv:2512.10403}
}
```

- arXiv: 2512.10403

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.