Evaluates long-context clinical NLP encoders on biomedical entity recognition, clinical text classification, and demographic information extraction. Probes the model's ability to process full-length clinical notes (up to 8,192 tokens) and retain domain-specific knowledge without truncation. Use when the user wants to benchmark on ChemProt, Phenotype, Social History, DEID, COS, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports F1 score.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill bioclinical-modernbert-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Bioclinical Modernbert Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-bioclinical-modernbert-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: bioclinical-modernbert-eval
description: Evaluates long-context clinical NLP encoders on biomedical entity recognition, clinical text classification, and demographic information extraction. Probes the model's ability to process full-length clinical notes (up to 8,192 tokens) and retain domain-specific knowledge without truncation. Use when the user wants to benchmark on ChemProt, Phenotype, Social History, DEID, COS, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports F1 score.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2506.10896
bibtex_key: sounack2025bioclinicalmodernbert
confidence: high
---
# bioclinical-modernbert-eval
> BioClinical ModernBERT: A State-of-the-Art Long-Context Encoder for Biomedical and Clinical NLP — Sounack et al. (2025) (arXiv:2506.10896, 2025)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates long-context clinical NLP encoders on biomedical entity recognition, clinical text classification, and demographic information extraction. Probes the model's ability to process full-length clinical notes (up to 8,192 tokens) and retain domain-specific knowledge without truncation.
## Datasets
- **ChemProt** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **Phenotype** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **Social History** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **DEID** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **COS** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
## Metrics
- `F1 score` **(primary)** — range: percent
- Harmonic mean of precision and recall. For classification tasks, macro-averaged across all classes. For NER tasks, entity-level exact match F1 is used.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Clinical text sequences (PubMed abstracts, clinical notes, social history records) tokenized with a 50,368-token vocabulary, processed at fixed lengths (512, 4096, or 8192 tokens) or as variable-length sequences.
**Output**: Class labels for classification tasks (e.g., chemical-protein relations, phenotype categories) or token-level entity tags for NER tasks (e.g., social history entities, demographic identifiers, clinical observations).
## Scoring recipe
```python
def compute_f1(predictions, gold_labels):
# Classification: macro-averaged F1
# NER: entity-level exact match F1
tp = sum(1 for p, g in zip(predictions, gold_labels) if p == g and p != 'O')
fp = sum(1 for p, g in zip(predictions, gold_labels) if p != g and p != 'O')
fn = sum(1 for p, g in zip(predictions, gold_labels) if p != g and g != 'O')
precision = tp / (tp + fp) if (tp + fp) > 0 else 0.0
recall = tp / (tp + fn) if (tp + fn) > 0 else 0.0
f1 = 2 * precision * recall / (precision + recall) if (precision + recall) > 0 else 0.0
return f1 * 100 # Return as percentage
```
## Common pitfalls
- Confusing fixed-length vs variable-length inference speed benchmarks; some models degrade significantly on variable-length sequences due to lack of unpadding.
- Using short-context truncation (e.g., 512 tokens) for clinical notes, which loses critical information compared to the model's designed 8,192-token context window.
- Evaluating Phase 1 vs Phase 2 checkpoints without clarifying that Phase 2 includes clinical specialization data, which can artificially inflate clinical task scores.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> For classification tasks, BioClinical ModernBERT large achieves state-of-the-art results with an F1 score of 90.8% on ChemProt and 60.8% on Phenotype. The base model also outperforms all other base models, achieving 89.9% on ChemProt and 58.1% on Phenotype. In named entity recognition, the base model achieves state-of-the-art performance on Social History and outperforms other base models on DEID.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{sounack2025bioclinicalmodernbert,
title={BioClinical ModernBERT: A State-of-the-Art Long-Context Encoder for Biomedical and Clinical NLP},
author={Sounack et al. (2025)},
year={2025},
note={arXiv:2506.10896}
}
```
- arXiv: 2506.10896
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!