Probes LLMs' ability to generate correct SQL queries from natural language questions over complex, enterprise-scale databases. It specifically evaluates handling of high schema complexity, multi-table joins, aggregations, and column-to-table mapping in real-world business contexts. Use when the user wants to benchmark on BEAVER, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports execution accuracy.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill beaver-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Beaver Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-beaver-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: beaver-eval
description: Probes LLMs' ability to generate correct SQL queries from natural language questions over complex, enterprise-scale databases. It specifically evaluates handling of high schema complexity, multi-table joins, aggregations, and column-to-table mapping in real-world business contexts. Use when the user wants to benchmark on BEAVER, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports execution accuracy.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2409.02038
bibtex_key: chen2024beaver
confidence: high
---
# beaver-eval
> BEAVER: An Enterprise Benchmark for Text-to-SQL — Chen et al. (2024) (arXiv:2409.02038, 2024)
## What this evaluates
Probes LLMs' ability to generate correct SQL queries from natural language questions over complex, enterprise-scale databases. It specifically evaluates handling of high schema complexity, multi-table joins, aggregations, and column-to-table mapping in real-world business contexts.
## Datasets
- **BEAVER** — total 203; splits: test (203)
## Metrics
- `execution accuracy` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]
- Percentage of generated SQL statements that produce the exact same result set as the gold SQL when executed against the provided database instances.
## Input / output format
**Input**: A natural language question paired with a database schema (table names, column names, data types) and table instances (row data).
**Output**: A single SQL statement.
## Scoring recipe
```python
def score(predictions, golds, databases):
correct = 0
for pred_sql, gold_sql, db in zip(predictions, golds, databases):
try:
pred_result = db.execute(pred_sql)
gold_result = db.execute(gold_sql)
if set(pred_result) == set(gold_result):
correct += 1
except Exception:
pass
return correct / len(predictions)
```
## Common pitfalls
- High schema complexity makes column and instance mapping challenging for models.
- Instance mapping is explicitly not annotated in the dataset due to considerable complexity.
- Models trained on public benchmarks often fail to generalize due to missing enterprise-scale multi-table joins and business-domain complexity.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> Following the standard problem setup of text-to-SQL, the input to an LLM includes a natural language question and a database of tables, and the output is a SQL statement whose execution answers the user’s question.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{chen2024beaver,
title={BEAVER: An Enterprise Benchmark for Text-to-SQL},
author={Chen et al. (2024)},
year={2024},
note={arXiv:2409.02038}
}
```
- arXiv: 2409.02038
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!