Evaluates a session-based recommendation model's ability to predict the next item in a user's browsing session. It probes the model's capacity to capture multi-level user intent and item semantics through attention mechanisms while handling session-specific inductive biases. Use when the user wants to benchmark on Diginetica, Gowalla, Last.fm, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports HR@K, MRR@K.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill atten-mixer-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Atten Mixer Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-atten-mixer-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: atten-mixer-eval
description: Evaluates a session-based recommendation model's ability to predict the next item in a user's browsing session. It probes the model's capacity to capture multi-level user intent and item semantics through attention mechanisms while handling session-specific inductive biases. Use when the user wants to benchmark on Diginetica, Gowalla, Last.fm, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports HR@K, MRR@K.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2206.12781
bibtex_key: zhang2022attenmixer
confidence: high
---
# atten-mixer-eval
> Efficiently Leveraging Multi-level User Intent for Session-based Recommendation via Atten-Mixer Network — Peiyan Zhang et al. (2022) (arXiv:2206.12781, 2022)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates a session-based recommendation model's ability to predict the next item in a user's browsing session. It probes the model's capacity to capture multi-level user intent and item semantics through attention mechanisms while handling session-specific inductive biases.
## Datasets
- **Diginetica** — total ?; splits: train (-1), val (-1), test (-1)
- **Gowalla** — total ?; splits: train (-1), val (-1), test (-1)
- **Last.fm** — total ?; splits: train (-1), val (-1), test (-1)
## Metrics
- `HR@K, MRR@K` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]
- Hit Rate@K (HR@K) is 1 if the ground truth item appears in the top-K predicted items, else 0. Mean Reciprocal Rank@K (MRR@K) is 1/rank if the ground truth is in the top-K, else 0. K takes values 5, 10, 20.
## Input / output format
**Input**: A sequence of item IDs representing a user's session history.
**Output**: A ranked list of candidate items (top-K) for the next interaction.
## Scoring recipe
```python
def hr_at_k(preds, gold, k):
return 1 if gold in preds[:k] else 0
def mrr_at_k(preds, gold, k):
for i, item in enumerate(preds[:k]):
if item == gold:
return 1.0 / (i + 1)
return 0.0
# Average over test set
hr = sum(hr_at_k(p, g, k) for p, g in zip(preds, golds)) / len(golds)
mrr = sum(mrr_at_k(p, g, k) for p, g in zip(preds, golds)) / len(golds)
```
## Common pitfalls
- Data preprocessing includes filtering short sessions and infrequent items, plus dataset-specific data augmentation before splitting.
- Temporal splitting varies by dataset: last week for Diginetica, last 20% of sessions for Gowalla and Last.fm, with fixed time intervals (1 day or 8 hours) for the latter two.
- Position bias in recommendation means smaller K values (e.g., K=5) are more sensitive to ranking quality and user attention.
- Results are averaged over 5 runs with different random seeds, not single runs.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> We use the same evaluation metrics HR@K (Hit Rate) and MRR@K (Mean Reciprocal Rank) following previous studies (Li et al., 2017; Qiu et al., 2019; Ren et al., 2019; Wu et al., 2019; Chen and Wong, 2020; Xu et al., 2019; Pan et al., 2020; Gupta et al., 2019).
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{zhang2022attenmixer,
title={Efficiently Leveraging Multi-level User Intent for Session-based Recommendation via Atten-Mixer Network},
author={Peiyan Zhang et al. (2022)},
year={2022},
note={arXiv:2206.12781}
}
```
- arXiv: 2206.12781
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!