Evaluates automatic speech recognition (ASR) and call sign detection (CSD) capabilities on real-world air traffic control audio. It probes the model's ability to transcribe accented, noisy pilot and controller speech and accurately identify aircraft call signs in domain-specific phraseology. Use when the user wants to benchmark on Airbus ATC Speech Recognition 2018 Challenge Corpus, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports WER.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill atc-asr-csd-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Atc Asr Csd Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-atc-asr-csd-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: atc-asr-csd-eval
description: Evaluates automatic speech recognition (ASR) and call sign detection (CSD) capabilities on real-world air traffic control audio. It probes the model's ability to transcribe accented, noisy pilot and controller speech and accurately identify aircraft call signs in domain-specific phraseology. Use when the user wants to benchmark on Airbus ATC Speech Recognition 2018 Challenge Corpus, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports WER.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 1810.12614
bibtex_key: pellegrini2018airbus
confidence: high
---
# atc-asr-csd-eval
> The Airbus Air Traffic Control speech recognition 2018 challenge: towards ATC automatic transcription and call sign detection — Pellegrini et al. (2018) (arXiv:1810.12614, 2018)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates automatic speech recognition (ASR) and call sign detection (CSD) capabilities on real-world air traffic control audio. It probes the model's ability to transcribe accented, noisy pilot and controller speech and accurately identify aircraft call signs in domain-specific phraseology.
## Datasets
- **Airbus ATC Speech Recognition 2018 Challenge Corpus** — total ?; splits: eval (-1)
## Metrics
- `WER` **(primary)** — range: percent
- Word Error Rate: (S + D + I) / N, where S=substitutions, D=deletions, I=insertions, N=number of reference words.
- `CSD F1-score` — range: percent
- F1-score for Call Sign Detection: harmonic mean of precision and recall computed over detected call sign spans.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Audio recordings of air traffic control communications (pilot and controller speech) with varying noise levels and accents.
**Output**: For ASR: word-level transcription. For CSD: detected call sign spans or labels.
## Scoring recipe
```python
# ASR WER
wer = (substitutions + deletions + insertions) / len(reference_words)
# CSD F1
precision = true_positives / (true_positives + false_positives)
recall = true_positives / (true_positives + false_negatives)
f1 = 2 * (precision * recall) / (precision + recall)
```
## Common pitfalls
- Call signs are often shortened or used in partial forms, making detection harder than strict rule-based matching.
- Pilots' speech has significantly higher WER than controllers' due to greater accent diversity and faster speech rates.
- Some teams submitted only ASR results without CSD predictions, resulting in zero CSD scores that skew overall rankings.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> Figures [1]a and [1]b show the Word Error Rates (WER) for the ASR task and the F1-scores for CSD, obtained by the 22 teams ordered by their final ranking. VOCAPIA-LIMSI achieved the best results in both tasks with a 7.62% WER and a 82.41% CSD F1-score.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{pellegrini2018airbus,
title={The Airbus Air Traffic Control speech recognition 2018 challenge: towards ATC automatic transcription and call sign detection},
author={Pellegrini et al. (2018)},
year={2018},
note={arXiv:1810.12614}
}
```
- arXiv: 1810.12614
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!