Evaluates the performance of LLMs fine-tuned on synthetic data generated by AIDE across a suite of standard knowledge and reasoning benchmarks. It probes zero-shot and few-shot generalization capabilities compared to models fine-tuned on human-curated gold data. Use when the user wants to benchmark on MMLU, FinBen, ARC-Challenge, GSM8K, TruthfulQA, MedQA, BIG-Bench, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports zero-shot accuracy.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill aide-benchmark-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Aide Benchmark Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-aide-benchmark-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: aide-benchmark-eval
description: Evaluates the performance of LLMs fine-tuned on synthetic data generated by AIDE across a suite of standard knowledge and reasoning benchmarks. It probes zero-shot and few-shot generalization capabilities compared to models fine-tuned on human-curated gold data. Use when the user wants to benchmark on MMLU, FinBen, ARC-Challenge, GSM8K, TruthfulQA, MedQA, BIG-Bench, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports zero-shot accuracy.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2412.06136
bibtex_key: li2024aide
confidence: high
---
# aide-benchmark-eval
> AIDE: Attribute-Guided MultI-Hop Data Expansion for Data Scarcity in Task-Specific Fine-tuning — Jiayu Li et al. (arXiv:2412.06136, 2024)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates the performance of LLMs fine-tuned on synthetic data generated by AIDE across a suite of standard knowledge and reasoning benchmarks. It probes zero-shot and few-shot generalization capabilities compared to models fine-tuned on human-curated gold data.
## Datasets
- **MMLU** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **FinBen** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **ARC-Challenge** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **GSM8K** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **TruthfulQA** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **MedQA** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **BIG-Bench** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
## Metrics
- `zero-shot accuracy` **(primary)** — range: percent
- Percentage of correctly predicted answers across all benchmark tasks. For GSM8K, the paper reports 8-shot maj@8 performance instead.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Benchmark-specific prompts. Most tasks use zero-shot prompts. GSM8K uses 8-shot prompts with in-context examples.
**Output**: Model-generated answer strings or multiple-choice selections.
## Scoring recipe
```python
def compute_accuracy(predictions, gold):
correct = sum(1 for p, g in zip(predictions, gold) if p == g)
return correct / len(gold) * 100
def compute_maj_at_8(predictions_8shot):
# predictions_8shot is a list of lists, each inner list has 8 generations
maj_votes = [Counter(p).most_common(1)[0][0] for p in predictions_8shot]
return maj_votes
```
## Common pitfalls
- GSM8K uses a different evaluation protocol (8-shot maj@8) than the zero-shot accuracy used for other benchmarks.
- The paper reports average performance across benchmarks, which can mask task-specific variance.
- Self-BLEU is used for diversity analysis but is not the primary performance metric.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> We evaluated all models using zero-shot accuracy as the primary metric on the benchmarks. For GSM8K, we report 8-shot maj@8 performance using prompts from Wang et al. (2023).
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{li2024aide,
title={AIDE: Attribute-Guided MultI-Hop Data Expansion for Data Scarcity in Task-Specific Fine-tuning},
author={Jiayu Li et al.},
year={2024},
note={arXiv:2412.06136}
}
```
- arXiv: 2412.06136
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!