Skip to content
Back to skills

Aide Benchmark Eval

ASecurity

Evaluates the performance of LLMs fine-tuned on synthetic data generated by AIDE across a suite of standard knowledge and reasoning benchmarks. It probes zero-shot and few-shot generalization capabilities compared to models fine-tuned on human-curated gold data. Use when the user wants to benchmark on MMLU, FinBen, ARC-Challenge, GSM8K, TruthfulQA, MedQA, BIG-Bench, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports zero-shot accuracy.

  • 3 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 2 views
  • Added September 11, 2026
researchpythongoperformance

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 11, 2026

npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill aide-benchmark-eval --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Aide Benchmark Eval?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Aide Benchmark Eval
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/qhjqhj00-aide-benchmark-eval/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-aide-benchmark-eval)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: aide-benchmark-eval
description: Evaluates the performance of LLMs fine-tuned on synthetic data generated by AIDE across a suite of standard knowledge and reasoning benchmarks. It probes zero-shot and few-shot generalization capabilities compared to models fine-tuned on human-curated gold data. Use when the user wants to benchmark on MMLU, FinBen, ARC-Challenge, GSM8K, TruthfulQA, MedQA, BIG-Bench, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports zero-shot accuracy.
metadata:
  skill_kind: dataset_eval
  source_arxiv: 2412.06136
  bibtex_key: li2024aide
  confidence: high
---

# aide-benchmark-eval

> AIDE: Attribute-Guided MultI-Hop Data Expansion for Data Scarcity in Task-Specific Fine-tuning — Jiayu Li et al. (arXiv:2412.06136, 2024)

## What this evaluates

Evaluates the performance of LLMs fine-tuned on synthetic data generated by AIDE across a suite of standard knowledge and reasoning benchmarks. It probes zero-shot and few-shot generalization capabilities compared to models fine-tuned on human-curated gold data.

## Datasets

- **MMLU** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **FinBen** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **ARC-Challenge** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **GSM8K** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **TruthfulQA** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **MedQA** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **BIG-Bench** — total ?; splits: test (-1)

## Metrics

- `zero-shot accuracy` **(primary)** — range: percent
  - Percentage of correctly predicted answers across all benchmark tasks. For GSM8K, the paper reports 8-shot maj@8 performance instead.

## Input / output format

**Input**: Benchmark-specific prompts. Most tasks use zero-shot prompts. GSM8K uses 8-shot prompts with in-context examples.

**Output**: Model-generated answer strings or multiple-choice selections.

## Scoring recipe

```python
def compute_accuracy(predictions, gold):
    correct = sum(1 for p, g in zip(predictions, gold) if p == g)
    return correct / len(gold) * 100

def compute_maj_at_8(predictions_8shot):
    # predictions_8shot is a list of lists, each inner list has 8 generations
    maj_votes = [Counter(p).most_common(1)[0][0] for p in predictions_8shot]
    return maj_votes
```

## Common pitfalls

- GSM8K uses a different evaluation protocol (8-shot maj@8) than the zero-shot accuracy used for other benchmarks.
- The paper reports average performance across benchmarks, which can mask task-specific variance.
- Self-BLEU is used for diversity analysis but is not the primary performance metric.

## Evidence (verbatim from paper)

> We evaluated all models using zero-shot accuracy as the primary metric on the benchmarks. For GSM8K, we report 8-shot maj@8 performance using prompts from Wang et al. (2023).

## Citation

```bibtex
@misc{li2024aide,
  title={AIDE: Attribute-Guided MultI-Hop Data Expansion for Data Scarcity in Task-Specific Fine-tuning},
  author={Jiayu Li et al.},
  year={2024},
  note={arXiv:2412.06136}
}
```

- arXiv: 2412.06136

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.