Evaluates test-time adaptation (TTA) capabilities of vision-language models under distribution shift and class imbalance. It probes how well a model can adapt to out-of-distribution and cross-domain image classification tasks without training, using adaptive entropy-based uncertainty estimation to select confident augmented views. Use when the user wants to benchmark on ImageNet & Cross-Domain Benchmarks, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports accuracy.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill adte-tta-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Adte Tta Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-adte-tta-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: adte-tta-eval
description: Evaluates test-time adaptation (TTA) capabilities of vision-language models under distribution shift and class imbalance. It probes how well a model can adapt to out-of-distribution and cross-domain image classification tasks without training, using adaptive entropy-based uncertainty estimation to select confident augmented views. Use when the user wants to benchmark on ImageNet & Cross-Domain Benchmarks, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports accuracy.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2602.11743
bibtex_key: wu2026adte
confidence: high
---
# adte-tta-eval
> Adaptive Debiasing Tsallis Entropy for Test-Time Adaptation — Wu et al. (2026) (arXiv:2602.11743, 2026)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates test-time adaptation (TTA) capabilities of vision-language models under distribution shift and class imbalance. It probes how well a model can adapt to out-of-distribution and cross-domain image classification tasks without training, using adaptive entropy-based uncertainty estimation to select confident augmented views.
## Datasets
- **ImageNet & Cross-Domain Benchmarks** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
## Metrics
- `accuracy` **(primary)** — range: percent
- Percentage of correctly classified test images out of the total number of test images. Reported per dataset and averaged across OOD variants or cross-domain datasets.
## Input / output format
**Input**: RGB image patches paired with text prompts (either hand-crafted templates or GPT-generated CuPL descriptions), processed by a frozen CLIP vision encoder (ViT-B/16 or ViT-L/14) during inference.
**Output**: Class prediction probabilities (logits) and entropy/uncertainty scores for each augmented view, used to select the most confident predictions for test-time adaptation.
## Scoring recipe
```python
predictions = []
for image, label in test_set:
views = augment(image, N=64)
probs = model(views, text_prompts)
selected_probs = filter_confident(probs, ratio=0.1)
pred = argmax(selected_probs)
predictions.append(pred)
accuracy = sum(p == l for p, l in zip(predictions, labels)) / len(labels)
```
## Common pitfalls
- Hyperparameters are strictly fixed (N=64 views, 0.1 filtering ratio, memory bank size=10, q interval [0.01, 0.9]) and must not be tuned per dataset.
- Results must be averaged over 3 random seeds, and both template-based and CuPL text prompts should be evaluated separately.
- The memory bank size of 1 does not mean the bank can be removed; it still aggregates pseudo-labels across all 200+ categories for bias estimation.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> Table 1: Accuracy comparison (%) on ImageNet and its variants for CLIP ViT-B/16 and ViT-L/14.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{wu2026adte,
title={Adaptive Debiasing Tsallis Entropy for Test-Time Adaptation},
author={Wu et al. (2026)},
year={2026},
note={arXiv:2602.11743}
}
```
- arXiv: 2602.11743
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!