Skip to content
Back to skills

Risk Register

ASecurity

Maintain a centralized living risk register across projects. Use this skill when: - You need to create or update a risk register for a project or feature - You want to consolidate risks from individual specs into one register - You need to review and update risk status, mitigations, and owners - You want a cross-project risk view

  • 20 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added October 4, 2026
ai-agentsgo

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned October 4, 2026

npx -y skills add qa-aman/claude-skills --skill risk-register --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Risk Register?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Risk Register
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/qa-aman-risk-register/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qa-aman-risk-register)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: risk-register
description: |
  Maintain a centralized living risk register across projects. Use this skill when:
  - You need to create or update a risk register for a project or feature
  - You want to consolidate risks from individual specs into one register
  - You need to review and update risk status, mitigations, and owners
  - You want a cross-project risk view
---

# Risk Register

Centralized risk register that consolidates risks from individual spec sections into one living document.

## Workflow

1. **Determine scope** — Single spec, single project, or cross-project
2. **Read Risks and Assumptions** from relevant specs
3. **If existing register exists**, read and merge (don't duplicate — match by description)
4. **Assess each risk** using the likelihood x impact matrix
5. **Output register**

## Risk Assessment Matrix

**Likelihood:** Low (unlikely) | Medium (possible) | High (probable)
**Impact:** Low (minor inconvenience) | Medium (feature degradation) | High (critical failure/data loss)

| | Low Impact | Medium Impact | High Impact |
|---|-----------|--------------|-------------|
| **High Likelihood** | Medium | High | Critical |
| **Medium Likelihood** | Low | Medium | High |
| **Low Likelihood** | Low | Low | Medium |

## Output Format

```markdown
# Risk Register — {Scope}

**Last Updated:** {DD-MM-YYYY}
**Total Risks:** {n} | Open: {n} | Mitigated: {n} | Closed: {n}

## Risk Summary

| ID | Risk | Source | Likelihood | Impact | Priority | Owner | Mitigation | Status | Last Reviewed |
|----|------|--------|-----------|--------|----------|-------|-----------|--------|--------------|
| R-001 | {desc} | {spec/feature} | H/M/L | H/M/L | Critical/High/Med/Low | {name/role} | {plan} | Open/Mitigated/Closed | {date} |

## Critical Risks
{Filtered view of Critical priority — requires immediate attention}

## Risk Trends
- New risks this period: {n}
- Risks closed this period: {n}
- Overdue reviews: {risks not reviewed in 30+ days}
```

## Rules

- Every risk MUST have an owner (name or role, not "TBD")
- Every risk MUST have a mitigation plan (not empty)
- Review date updates when risk is revisited
- Risk IDs are sequential (R-001, R-002) and never reused
- When merging with existing register, preserve existing IDs
- Separate risks from assumptions — only risks go in the register

## Anti-Patterns

- Don't create a risk without a mitigation plan — "TBD" is not acceptable
- Don't reuse risk IDs — closed risks keep their IDs
- Don't mix risks and assumptions — they're different things

## Quality Checklist

- [ ] Every risk has an owner
- [ ] Every risk has a mitigation plan
- [ ] Likelihood x Impact matrix applied
- [ ] Critical risks highlighted
- [ ] Risk IDs are sequential and unique

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…