Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsBlogPro
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges
  • Chrome Extension
  • Skill Manager

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Program Status Report

ASecurity

Write a structured weekly or bi-weekly program status report for stakeholders. Use when the user says "write a status report", "program update", "stakeholder update", "weekly status", "RAG status", "program health report", "what do I send to leadership", "write the update for [program]", or needs to communicate delivery progress - even if they don't explicitly say "status report". Produces a concise, scannable report with RAG status, blockers, and decisions needed.

20 stars
0 votes
0 copies
1 views
Added 10/4/2026
ai-agentsgo

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 10/4/2026

$npx -y skills add qa-aman/claude-skills --skill program-status-report --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Program Status Report?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Program Status Report
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/qa-aman-program-status-report/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qa-aman-program-status-report)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: program-status-report
description: >
  Write a structured weekly or bi-weekly program status report for stakeholders.
  Use when the user says "write a status report", "program update", "stakeholder
  update", "weekly status", "RAG status", "program health report", "what do I send
  to leadership", "write the update for [program]", or needs to communicate delivery
  progress - even if they don't explicitly say "status report". Produces a concise,
  scannable report with RAG status, blockers, and decisions needed.
---

## Overview

A program status report has one job: give stakeholders the information they need to make decisions or remove blockers, in under 3 minutes. The failure mode is burying the lead - putting good news first and hiding the red items in paragraph 4. The format here front-loads risk and decisions needed, then provides supporting detail. Stakeholders who need detail can read further; those who only need the headline get it immediately.

## Workflow

### Step 1: Gather inputs
Ask the user for:
- Program name and reporting period (e.g., "Week of March 3")
- Overall RAG status (Red / Amber / Green) - if they are not sure, work through it in Step 2
- Key accomplishments since last report (what shipped, what was decided)
- Current blockers (what is slowing or stopping the program)
- Decisions needed from stakeholders (specific asks, not general concerns)
- Upcoming milestones (next 2-3 checkpoints and dates)
- Any risks that surfaced or changed this period

If the user provides a narrative or notes, extract these fields from their input before generating the report.

### Step 2: Determine the RAG status
If the user is unsure of the overall status, use this rubric:

**Green**: Program is on track. No unresolved blockers. Milestones will be met as planned.

**Amber**: Program is at risk. One or more of:
- A milestone is at risk but there is a recovery plan
- A dependency is unresolved but expected to resolve within 1 sprint
- Scope reduction is being discussed but not yet decided

**Red**: Program is off track. One or more of:
- A milestone will be missed with no recovery plan
- A dependency is unresolved with no clear path forward
- Scope or date change is required and has not been approved
- A critical team or resource issue has no mitigation

Amber should be used before a problem becomes Red - it is an early warning, not a failure state. Do not use Green if anything requires stakeholder action.

### Step 3: Write the report

Use this template exactly:

```
PROGRAM STATUS - [your program]
Period: [week / sprint / date range]
Updated: [date]
Owner: [your name]

STATUS: [GREEN / AMBER / RED]
[One sentence explaining the status. If Amber or Red, name the specific issue.]

---

DECISIONS NEEDED
[If none, write "None this period."]
1. [Decision needed from whom, by when, and what happens if it is not made]
2. [Next decision if any]

BLOCKERS
[If none, write "No active blockers."]
1. [Blocker description] - Owner: [name] - Target resolution: [date]
2. [Next blocker if any]

---

ACCOMPLISHMENTS (this period)
- [What shipped, what was accepted, what was decided]
- [Keep to 3-5 bullets max. Not every ticket - program-level progress only]

UPCOMING MILESTONES
| Milestone | Target Date | Status |
|-----------|------------|--------|
| [name] | [date] | On track / At risk / Delayed |
| [name] | [date] | [status] |

---

RISKS (new or changed)
[If none, write "No new risks this period."]
- [Risk]: [likelihood] / [impact] - Mitigation: [action and owner]

NOTES / CONTEXT
[Optional: 2-3 sentences of context that stakeholders need. Skip if nothing material.]
```

### Step 4: Apply the three-minute rule
After writing the report, verify:
- A stakeholder can read the STATUS line and DECISIONS NEEDED section in 30 seconds and know if action is required from them
- The report is 1 page max when pasted into Slack, email, or a wiki
- Accomplishments section is 3-5 bullets - not a sprint changelog
- If anything in the Blockers or Decisions section is more than 2 lines, it is too long - link to a separate doc

### Step 5: Calibrate frequency and audience
Recommend the right distribution based on program phase:
- **Weekly**: standard for active programs with external dependencies or stakeholder decisions pending
- **Bi-weekly**: appropriate for programs in steady-state delivery with no active escalations
- **Daily**: only when a program is Red and actively in recovery mode

Audience guidance:
- **Executives / leadership**: STATUS + DECISIONS NEEDED only. They do not need the milestone table.
- **Peer teams / dependencies**: BLOCKERS + UPCOMING MILESTONES. They need to know what you need from them.
- **Full team**: Full report including accomplishments and notes.

## Anti-Patterns

**1. Green-washing - everything is always green**
Bad: Status is Green every week until the release is 2 weeks late.
Good: Use Amber early. Amber means "we have a plan but it needs attention" - that is valuable signal, not failure.

**2. Accomplishments section as a ticket dump**
Bad: 15 bullets listing every closed Jira ticket.
Good: 3-5 program-level progress statements. "Core checkout flow accepted by QA" not "JIRA-1234, JIRA-1235, JIRA-1236 closed."

**3. Vague blockers**
Bad: "We're blocked on infrastructure."
Good: "Waiting on cloud team to provision staging environment. Owner: [name]. Target: [date]. If not resolved by [date], release date is at risk."

**4. Decisions buried at the bottom**
Bad: Status report where the decision needed from leadership is in paragraph 6.
Good: DECISIONS NEEDED is the second section - immediately after the RAG status line.

**5. No cadence - status reports only when things go wrong**
Bad: Stakeholders only hear from you when there is a crisis.
Good: Regular cadence trains stakeholders to expect updates and creates a paper trail. It also normalizes Amber status before it becomes Red.

## Quality Checklist

- [ ] RAG status is on the first line with a one-sentence explanation
- [ ] DECISIONS NEEDED section is above accomplishments and milestones
- [ ] Every blocker has a named owner and target resolution date
- [ ] Accomplishments are 3-5 bullets of program-level progress, not ticket lists
- [ ] Report is skimmable in under 3 minutes
- [ ] If status is Amber or Red, a recovery plan or escalation path is stated

Attribution

qa-amanqa-aman
View sourceSee grades on GitHubMore from qa-aman →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Related Skills

Caveman

Terse caveman voice: answer first, fluff gone, every technical fact kept. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief", "less tokens". Stays on until "stop caveman" or "normal mode".

1100021 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

698461 votes

Writing Skills

Create and manage Claude Code skills in HASH repository following Anthropic best practices. Use when creating new skills, modifying skill-rules.json, understanding trigger patterns, working with hooks, debugging skill activation, or implementing progressive disclosure. Covers skill structure, YAML frontmatter, trigger types (keywords, intent patterns), UserPromptSubmit hook, and the 500-line rule. Includes validation and debugging with SKILL_DEBUG. Examples include rust-error-stack, cargo-dep...

3931 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3421 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Amp, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Grok Build, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

741 votes
View all in ai-agents →