Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsBlogPro
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges
  • Chrome Extension
  • Skill Manager

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Product Thinking

ASecurity

Run structured product thinking exercises before writing a spec. Use this skill when: - You need to think through a feature idea before writing a PRD - You want to run the 11-star experience exercise for a feature - You need a positioning statement using Geoffrey Moore's framework - You want to define product principles and success vision for a new feature - You have a raw feature idea and need to turn it into a structured brief

20 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 10/4/2026
ai-agentsgorails

Security Analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 2 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned 10/4/2026

$npx -y skills add qa-aman/claude-skills --skill product-thinking --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Product Thinking?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Product Thinking
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/qa-aman-product-thinking/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qa-aman-product-thinking)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: product-thinking
description: |
  Run structured product thinking exercises before writing a spec. Use this skill when:
  - You need to think through a feature idea before writing a PRD
  - You want to run the 11-star experience exercise for a feature
  - You need a positioning statement using Geoffrey Moore's framework
  - You want to define product principles and success vision for a new feature
  - You have a raw feature idea and need to turn it into a structured brief
---

# Product Thinking

Interactive skill that builds product thinking through 5 structured exercises. Outputs a Product Thinking Brief that feeds into spec writing.

This is the "thinking before writing" layer — run this BEFORE drafting any spec.

## Workflow

1. **Gather context** — Ask user for: feature idea, target users, motivation
2. **Read source files** — Personas, product context, feedback, competitors (only relevant files)
3. **Run 5 exercises** — Present findings, get user validation at each step
4. **Write brief** — Output to file or print

## The 5 Exercises

### Exercise 1: Problem Statement

Answer four questions with evidence:

| Dimension | What to Answer |
|-----------|---------------|
| **Who** | Specific persona (not generic "users") |
| **Evidence** | Cite feedback, pilot data, research — not assertions |
| **Impact if unsolved** | Quantify or describe the cost of inaction |
| **Why unsolved** | Technical, behavioral, or systemic barriers |

### Exercise 2: 11-Star Experience Ladder

For THIS specific feature, describe star levels 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11. Identify realistic target for current phase.

See `references/11-star-framework.md` for the full framework.

Output: Table + "**Target Star Level:** {N} — {rationale}"

### Exercise 3: Positioning Statement

Geoffrey Moore's framework:

> "For [target users], who [need/pain], [product/feature] is a [category] that [key benefit]. Unlike [competitors], it [differentiator]."

- Pull target users from persona files
- Include "current manual process" as a competitor if no direct competitor exists

### Exercise 4: Product Principles

Define 3-5 guardrails for this feature:

| Principle | Description | Following It | Violating It |
|-----------|-------------|-------------|-------------|
| e.g., "Offline-first" | Works without internet | Auto-sync when connected | Require internet for core flow |

### Exercise 5: Success Vision

Answer in 2-3 paragraph narrative:
- **Done well in 6 months** — Describe the ideal outcome
- **Behavior change expected** — How will users act differently?
- **Kill criteria** — What evidence would make us kill this feature?

## Output Format

```markdown
# Product Thinking Brief — {Feature Name}

**Date:** {DD-MM-YYYY}
**Author:** [your name]

## 1. Problem Statement
[table from Exercise 1]

## 2. 11-Star Experience
[table from Exercise 2]
**Target Star Level:** {N} — {rationale}

## 3. Positioning Statement
> For [target users], who [need/pain]...

## 4. Product Principles
[table from Exercise 4]

## 5. Success Vision
[narrative from Exercise 5]

## Next Step
Use this brief as input for your PRD/spec writing skill.
```

## Anti-Patterns

- Don't skip the problem statement — it's the foundation
- Don't set target star level above 7 for early phases — be realistic
- Don't write generic principles — they should be specific enough to be falsifiable
- Don't skip kill criteria — knowing when to stop is as important as knowing what to build

## Quality Checklist

- [ ] Problem statement has evidence, not just assertions
- [ ] 11-star ladder is specific to THIS feature, not generic
- [ ] Positioning statement names a real competitor or current process
- [ ] Principles are falsifiable (you can tell when they're violated)
- [ ] Kill criteria are defined

Attribution

qa-amanqa-aman
View sourceSee grades on GitHubMore from qa-aman →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Related Skills

Caveman

Terse caveman voice: answer first, fluff gone, every technical fact kept. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief", "less tokens". Stays on until "stop caveman" or "normal mode".

1100021 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

698461 votes

Writing Skills

Create and manage Claude Code skills in HASH repository following Anthropic best practices. Use when creating new skills, modifying skill-rules.json, understanding trigger patterns, working with hooks, debugging skill activation, or implementing progressive disclosure. Covers skill structure, YAML frontmatter, trigger types (keywords, intent patterns), UserPromptSubmit hook, and the 500-line rule. Includes validation and debugging with SKILL_DEBUG. Examples include rust-error-stack, cargo-dep...

3931 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3421 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Amp, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Grok Build, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

741 votes
View all in ai-agents →