Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsBlogPro
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges
  • Chrome Extension
  • Skill Manager

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Outcome

ASecurity

How every ProvenMap command closes — the Outcome you write from the script's brief. Use at the last step of any command or routed workflow, when the step says "Done · Left · Next" or names --brief. Covers the fixed shape, the eight writing rules with examples, how to read a brief (state, gates, candidates, hand-offs), the one-line form, and what never appears.

3 stars
0 votes
0 copies
1 views
Added 9/25/2026
researchgonodegit

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 10/3/2026

$npx -y skills add provenmap/pmap-claude --skill outcome --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Outcome?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Outcome
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/provenmap-outcome/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/provenmap-outcome)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: outcome
user-invokable: false
description: How every ProvenMap command closes — the Outcome you write from the script's brief. Use at the last step of any command or routed workflow, when the step says "Done · Left · Next" or names --brief. Covers the fixed shape, the eight writing rules with examples, how to read a brief (state, gates, candidates, hand-offs), the one-line form, and what never appears.
metadata:
  author: ProvenMap
  version: 1.0.0
---

# The Outcome

A command ends with an Outcome **you write**, from a brief **the script returns**. The script
knows the state — names, numbers, gates, the moves the state calls for. You know what this run
did, what the user asked, and what they are trying to get done. The Outcome is where those meet.

The shape is fixed so a reader finds it in the same place on every plugin and every host. The
words are yours, and they are never the same twice.

## The shape

```
**Outcome**
Done: <what changed, with this run's numbers and names>
Left: <what this run did not do, or found wanting>
Next: <one move and why> <up to two alternatives, each with its why>
↪ <a hand-off, when the next move belongs to someone else>
```

Three to eight lines. `Left` is omitted only when there is genuinely nothing. Hand-offs sit on
their own `↪` line, never numbered, never inside Next. For `/update`, `/logout` and `/report-bug`
the whole Outcome is one line.

## Reading the brief

`node <plugin>/scripts/pmap-status.js --brief --command <name>` (code) or
`pmap-architect.js --brief --command <name>` returns JSON. Some results already carry it as
`brief` — `/sync`'s push, `/analyze`'s plan close, `/ground`'s push, `/work-items`' resolution, the
completed `/login` — use that and skip the call.

- **`gates`** — blocking conditions with their `fix`. A gate is the whole of Next, alone: "Next:
  `git switch main` — the binding is pinned to main and every push refuses until you are on it."
- **`candidates`** — the moves, ranked. `because` is the fact to cite. `source: "after"` follows
  the command that just ran; `source: "ladder"` is what the state calls for anyway. `rank:
  "last"` is optional work — mention it after the lead, never as the lead.
- **`state`** — names and numbers: board slugs, files behind HEAD, pending elements, gap names,
  batch ids, draft file names, unprepped new apps. A move that is not a candidate is allowed only
  when a fact here justifies it, and the Outcome says which.
- **`handoffs`** — work in another session (developers in a repo, the architect in ProvenMap, an
  admin). Always the `↪` line.

## The eight rules

1. **Done cites this run.** Numbers and names from the results above — nodes pushed, boards
   skipped, gaps recorded, work items resolved, files written.
   - Bad: `Done: sync completed successfully.`
   - Good: `Done: pushed payments-overview — 12 nodes, 8 edges, verified against the read-back.`
2. **Left is honest.** Skipped steps, waived files, undrawn nodes, a failed verification, a
   question the run could not answer. Source the analysis cannot read (`state.unreadSource`) is
   always Left, even at 100%. Never promise that `coverage.extensions` makes it readable:
   it adds the files by name only, with no edges.
   - Bad: (omitted, while the run skipped a board)
   - Good: `Left: checkout was skipped — 14 files behind HEAD; a push would send stale plan units.`
3. **Next leads with one move and its because.** The because is a fact from the brief or from
   this run — never a description of the command (`/help` has those). Blocking gates come first
   and alone. At most two alternatives.
   - Bad: `Next: /insights — run intelligence over the board.`
   - Good: `Next: /work-items — the architect promoted 2 findings from batch b-12 into work items for this board.`
4. **Candidates or justified.** A move is one of the brief's candidates, or a named `state` fact
   justifies it. No invented flags, no invented commands, no command the state makes impossible.
   Another plugin's command is never a move — that is a hand-off.
   - Bad: `Next: /work-items --force` (no such flag) · `Next: /pmap-architect:insights` (another session)
   - Good: `↪ The architect can review payments-overview in ProvenMap now.`
   - The one move no brief carries: when a script failed in a way the run could neither explain
     nor work around, `/report-bug` may follow the fix-or-retry move — it drafts a report with
     the project's names removed.
5. **Tie back to the user.** If they asked a question or named a goal this session, the Outcome
   answers it or says where it stands.
   - Good: `You asked whether the review can go ahead tomorrow — yes: both boards are pushed.`
6. **Never the same paragraph twice.** When the candidates are the quiet-state entries, say the
   workspace is quiet and name one thing worth doing.
   - Bad: `Next: /board — orient. /ask-board — ask. /hub — attention queue.` (every time)
   - Good: `Next: nothing needs you. /ask-board is a good way to spend the quiet — try the
     question the review raised.`
7. **No Outcome on a plain answer.** A turn that answered a question without running a workflow
   ends like a colleague's reply. The Outcome belongs to commands and routed workflows.
8. **Verbatim stays verbatim for tables.** A `display` field (status report, help card, work items
   list) still prints unchanged. The Outcome is the paragraph after it, never a rewrite of it.

## Four Outcomes

After `/sync` that pushed one board and skipped another:

```
**Outcome**
Done: pushed payments-overview — 12 nodes, 8 edges, verified against the server read-back.
Left: checkout was skipped; it is 14 files behind HEAD and a push would send stale plan units.
  2 nodes on payments-overview carry the closest-fit type — the catalogue has no agent_command.
Next: /analyze checkout, then /sync again — that brings the second board current. With both
  pushed, /insights runs the first analysis over the whole tree. The archetype gap can wait for
  /analyze-archetypes whenever you want the vocabulary settled.
↪ The architect can review payments-overview in ProvenMap now.
```

After `/ground` that re-grounded the board:

```
**Outcome**
Done: mirrored payments-overview and pushed 41 evidence links; the 3 that had drifted since the
  last run are re-linked to the current documents.
Left: 2 nodes (`refund-policy`, `dispute-flow`) have no citation yet — nothing in docs/ mentions
  them.
Next: /insights — the board is grounded for the first time, so the first analysis runs on real
  evidence. /work-items if you would rather work the architect's queue before that.
↪ The architect can review payments-overview in ProvenMap now.
```

After `/update` when nothing changed and the user was mid-sync (one line):

```
**Outcome** pmap-code is already at 0.17.0 — nothing changed. You were mid-way through syncing
payments; /sync picks that up.
```

After `/new-app` for a net-new app:

```
**Outcome**
Done: checkout is placed on the landscape as a new_app with 4 target components; its founding
  intent is drafted, not released.
Left: no skills chosen, no sequenced intents — placed, not build-ready.
Next: /prepare-app checkout grills the spec into sequenced intents and picks its skills; that is
  what makes it buildable. /author-work-item checkout if you would rather add requirements first.
```

## What never appears

An invented flag or command. Another plugin's command as a move. A command a gate blocks. The
quiet-state trio verbatim. A restated `display` table. "Completed successfully" with no number.
A Next with no because.

Attribution

provenmapprovenmap
View sourceSee grades on GitHubMore from provenmap →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Related Skills

Competitor Analysis

This skill provides comprehensive analysis of competitor SEO and GEO strategies, revealing what's working in your market and identifying opportunities to outperform the competition.

1823 votes

Deep Research

Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 8 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, three-way literature scan, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report co...

502942 votes

Paperclip Distill

Use when an operation issue is a Paperclip cursor-window, distill, or backfill — `operationType: "distill"` or `"backfill"` and the body references a Paperclip source bundle for a project or root issue. Turn raw Paperclip activity into a wiki-insightful project page, decisions log, and history note. This skill exists specifically to replace the stiff, datestamp-heavy templated output that the deterministic distiller produces.

953191 votes

Academic Pipeline

Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory, coverage-bounded integrity checks, two-stage peer review, and auditable quality-assurance artifacts. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end p...

502941 votes

Last30days 2

Research any topic across Reddit, X/Twitter, and the web from the last 30 days. Synthesizes findings into actionable insights or copy-paste prompts.

6511 votes
View all in research →