Skip to content
Back to skills

Strategy Stack

ASecurity

Use this skill when the user asks to "review our strategy", "do we have a coherent strategy", "is our strategy working", "strategic review", "strategy audit", "is our roadmap strategic", "does our strategy make sense", "connecting vision to roadmap", or wants a holistic assessment of whether their product strategy is coherent and differentiated. This is a synthesis skill — it uses the output of other strategy skills together.

  • 75 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added May 28, 2026
ai-agentsgo

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned May 28, 2026

npx -y skills add Productfculty-aipm/PM-Copilot-by-Product-Faculty --skill strategy-stack --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Strategy Stack?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Strategy Stack
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/productfculty-aipm-strategy-stack/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/productfculty-aipm-strategy-stack)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: strategy-stack
description: Use this skill when the user asks to "review our strategy", "do we have a coherent strategy", "is our strategy working", "strategic review", "strategy audit", "is our roadmap strategic", "does our strategy make sense", "connecting vision to roadmap", or wants a holistic assessment of whether their product strategy is coherent and differentiated. This is a synthesis skill — it uses the output of other strategy skills together.
version: 2.0.0
---

# Strategy Stack Review

You are conducting a holistic strategy review — evaluating whether the user's product strategy is internally coherent and externally differentiated. A good strategy is a set of mutually reinforcing choices that create a hard-to-replicate position.

Frameworks: Shreyas Doshi (3 levels of product work), Michael Porter (competing to be unique), Hamilton Helmer (7 Powers), Lenny Rachitsky (differentiating your product).

## Step 1 — Load Context

Read in full:
- `memory/user-profile.md` — all fields
- `context/product/roadmap.md` — current OKRs and Now/Next/Later
- `context/company/mission.md` — company stage and direction
- `context/company/competitors.md` — if it exists

## Step 2 — The Strategy Stack

Evaluate coherence at each level:

**Level 1 — Vision (Where are we going?)**
- Is there a clear, specific, differentiated vision?
- Does it describe a world that's meaningfully different from today?
- Would users and investors understand immediately why it matters?
Score: [1–5]

**Level 2 — Strategic positioning (How will we get there?)**
- Is the target segment specific and beachhead-able?
- Is the competitive differentiation clear and defensible?
- Are there deliberate moats being built (7 Powers)?
- Is the business model appropriate for the stage and segment?
Score: [1–5]

**Level 3 — OKRs (What does winning look like this quarter?)**
- Do OKRs translate vision and positioning into measurable outcomes?
- Are they outcome-framed, not output-framed?
- Do they connect to a North Star Metric?
Score: [1–5]

**Level 4 — Roadmap (What are we building?)**
- Does the roadmap serve the OKRs?
- Is there a 80/20 split between cover fire and big bets?
- Is anything on the roadmap that doesn't ladder to an OKR or moat?
Score: [1–5]

**Level 5 — Execution (Are we shipping well?)**
- Are PRDs clear and complete before work starts?
- Is the team able to make good decisions without the PM in the room?
- Are success metrics defined and reviewed post-ship?
Score: [1–5]

## Step 3 — Coherence Check

A coherent strategy has all five levels pointing in the same direction. Test coherence:

- If you read only the OKRs, can you guess the vision? (Yes = coherent)
- If you read only the roadmap, can you guess the OKRs? (Yes = coherent)
- Do the things NOT on the roadmap clearly not serve the vision? (Yes = coherent)
- Would a smart outsider be able to predict your next move from your current strategy? (Yes = coherent)

## Step 4 — Differentiation Test

Apply Porter's differentiation test:
- Are you competing to be the best (same activities, just better) or competing to be unique (different activities, hard to copy)?
- What would you have to stop doing if a fast-growing competitor could do everything you do, 10% better?
- What would a competitor have to change about their whole business model to beat you? (That's your moat.)

## Step 5 — Strategy Diagnosis

Based on scores and coherence check, diagnose:

**Score 18–25:** Strategy is coherent and differentiated — execution is the bottleneck
**Score 12–17:** Strategy has gaps — which level(s) are weak?
**Score below 12:** Strategy needs fundamental work before execution will compound

For each weak level, reference the relevant skill to fix it:
- Vision weak → vision-setting
- Positioning weak → competitive-positioning or beachhead-mapping
- OKRs weak → okr-structuring
- Roadmap weak → /roadmap command
- Execution weak → prd-authoring or sprint-prioritization

## Step 6 — Output

Produce:
- Strategy stack scorecard (5 levels, 1–5 each, with evidence)
- Coherence assessment (what's aligned, what's not)
- Differentiation diagnosis (competing to be best vs. competing to be unique)
- Top recommendation: which level to work on first and why
- One strategic question that, if answered honestly, would change the roadmap

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.