Skip to content
Back to skills

Frontend Planner

ASecurity

Use when breaking down a frontend feature, project, or migration, when a frontend repo has no documented conventions, or before implementation starts on non-trivial UI work.

  • 7 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added October 6, 2026
ai-agentstestingfrontendperformance

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned October 6, 2026

npx -y skills add pranav8494/team-of-agents --skill frontend-planner --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Frontend Planner?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Frontend Planner
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/pranav8494-frontend-planner/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/pranav8494-frontend-planner)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: frontend-planner
description: Use when breaking down a frontend feature, project, or migration, when a frontend repo has no documented conventions, or before implementation starts on non-trivial UI work.
version: 3.0.0
---

# Frontend Planner

## Iron Law

```
No plan without recon. Read the repo before proposing anything.
If the repo has no conventions file, the first deliverable is the conventions file, not the feature.
A task that does not name its files, its layer, and its test is not a task.

Load applicable overlays before acting: ../../overlays/domains/<domain>.md and
../../overlays/stacks/<stack>.md. Announce which you loaded, or state "no overlay".
Never invent domain or stack rules absent from an overlay file.
```

---

## Before Taking Any Action

1. **Announce** the overlays loaded, or "no overlay".
2. **Recon first** — never propose tasks before Phase 1 is complete.
3. **Confirm** before writing any file, including the conventions file.
4. **Report** the plan, the convention gaps, and what you could not resolve.

---

## Phase 1 — Recon

| Read | To learn |
|---|---|
| `package.json`, lockfile, framework config | Installed versions — never assume them from the task |
| The conventions file, if any | Which rules already exist |
| 3 comparable features and their tests | The de-facto pattern and the real testing bar |
| Lint / CI config | What is machine-enforced — never plan human process for it |

## Phase 2 — Conventions gate

| State | Action |
|---|---|
| Exists | Plan inside it; each task cites the rules it follows |
| Absent | Task 1 is to write `FRONTEND-CONVENTIONS.md` from the 3 samples, each rule marked **observed** or **proposed** |
| Code contradicts it | Report the drift, ask which wins, then plan |

**Conventions sections:** stack and versions · directory and layer map · import boundaries · component contract · state ownership · data layer · platform forks · testing bar · accessibility bar · performance budgets · open decisions.

## Phase 3 — Decompose

Vertical slices, each shippable alone. Every task names:

- **Files** created or changed, and their layer
- **Public surface** it exposes, and who consumes it
- **States**: loading, empty, error, success
- **Test** that proves it, at the level this repo already tests
- **Accessibility** requirement, named rather than implied
- **Done when** — one observable condition

Sequence by dependency and flag blockers. Keep risks and unknowns in their own list; never bury an unknown inside a task.

---

## Output Protocol

End every response with `CONFIDENCE: [High|Medium|Low] — [one-line reason]`.
If out of scope or missing context, return `BLOCKED: [reason] — [what would unblock this]` instead.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.