Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsBlogPro
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges
  • Chrome Extension
  • Skill Manager

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Exploring Llm Clusters

ASecurity

Investigate AI observability clusters — understand usage patterns in AI/LLM traffic, compare cluster behavior, compute cost/latency metrics, and drill into individual traces within clusters.

88 stars
0 votes
0 copies
1 views
Added 5/28/2026
ai-agentsgosql

Security Analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 2 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned 5/28/2026

$npx -y skills add PostHog/ai-plugin --skill exploring-llm-clusters --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Exploring Llm Clusters?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Exploring Llm Clusters
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/posthog-exploring-llm-clusters/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/posthog-exploring-llm-clusters)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: exploring-llm-clusters
description: 'Investigate AI observability clusters — understand usage patterns in AI/LLM traffic, compare cluster behavior, compute cost/latency metrics, and drill into individual traces within clusters.'
---

# Exploring LLM clusters

Use this skill when investigating AI observability clusters —
understanding what patterns exist in your AI/LLM traffic,
comparing cluster behavior, and drilling into individual clusters.

## Tools

| Tool                               | Purpose                                         |
| ---------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------- |
| `posthog:llma-clustering-job-list` | List clustering job configurations for the team |
| `posthog:llma-clustering-job-get`  | Get a specific clustering job by ID             |
| `posthog:execute-sql`              | Query cluster run events and compute metrics    |
| `posthog:query-llm-traces-list`    | Find traces belonging to a cluster              |
| `posthog:query-llm-trace`          | Inspect a specific trace in detail              |

## How clustering works

PostHog clusters LLM traces (or individual generations) by embedding similarity.
A Temporal workflow runs periodically or on-demand, producing cluster events stored as
`$ai_trace_clusters` (trace-level) or `$ai_generation_clusters` (generation-level).

Each cluster event contains:

- `$ai_clustering_run_id` — unique run identifier (format: `<team_id>_<level>_<YYYYMMDD>_<HHMMSS>[_<job_id>]`)
- `$ai_clustering_level` — `"trace"` or `"generation"`
- `$ai_window_start` / `$ai_window_end` — time window analyzed
- `$ai_total_items_analyzed` — number of traces/generations processed
- `$ai_clusters` — JSON array of cluster objects
- `$ai_clustering_params` — algorithm parameters used

### Cluster object shape (inside `$ai_clusters`)

```json
{
  "cluster_id": 0,
  "size": 42,
  "title": "User authentication flows",
  "description": "Traces involving login, signup, and token refresh operations",
  "traces": {
    "<trace_or_generation_id>": {
      "distance_to_centroid": 0.123,
      "rank": 0,
      "x": -2.34,
      "y": 1.56,
      "timestamp": "2026-03-28T10:00:00Z",
      "trace_id": "abc-123",
      "generation_id": "gen-456"
    }
  },
  "centroid_x": -2.1,
  "centroid_y": 1.4
}
```

- `cluster_id: -1` is the **noise/outlier** cluster (items that didn't fit any cluster)
- Items in `traces` are keyed by trace ID (trace-level) or generation event UUID (generation-level)
- `rank` orders items by proximity to centroid (0 = closest)
- `x`, `y` are 2D coordinates for visualization (UMAP/PCA/t-SNE reduced)

## Clustering jobs

Each team can have up to 5 clustering jobs. A job defines:

- **name** — human-readable label
- **analysis_level** — `"trace"` or `"generation"`
- **event_filters** — property filters scoping which traces are included
- **enabled** — whether the job runs on schedule

Default jobs named `"Default - trace"` and `"Default - generation"` are auto-created
and disabled when a custom job is created for the same level.

## Workflow: explore clusters

### Step 1 — List recent clustering runs

```sql
posthog:execute-sql
SELECT
    JSONExtractString(properties, '$ai_clustering_run_id') as run_id,
    JSONExtractString(properties, '$ai_clustering_level') as level,
    JSONExtractString(properties, '$ai_window_start') as window_start,
    JSONExtractString(properties, '$ai_window_end') as window_end,
    JSONExtractInt(properties, '$ai_total_items_analyzed') as total_items,
    timestamp
FROM events
WHERE event IN ('$ai_trace_clusters', '$ai_generation_clusters')
    AND timestamp >= now() - INTERVAL 7 DAY
ORDER BY timestamp DESC
LIMIT 10
```

### Step 2 — Get clusters from a specific run

```sql
posthog:execute-sql
SELECT
    JSONExtractString(properties, '$ai_clustering_run_id') as run_id,
    JSONExtractString(properties, '$ai_clustering_level') as level,
    JSONExtractString(properties, '$ai_clustering_job_id') as job_id,
    JSONExtractString(properties, '$ai_clustering_job_name') as job_name,
    JSONExtractString(properties, '$ai_window_start') as window_start,
    JSONExtractString(properties, '$ai_window_end') as window_end,
    JSONExtractInt(properties, '$ai_total_items_analyzed') as total_items,
    JSONExtractRaw(properties, '$ai_clusters') as clusters,
    JSONExtractRaw(properties, '$ai_clustering_params') as params
FROM events
WHERE event IN ('$ai_trace_clusters', '$ai_generation_clusters')
    AND JSONExtractString(properties, '$ai_clustering_run_id') = '<run_id>'
LIMIT 1
```

The `clusters` field is a JSON array. Parse it to see cluster titles, sizes, and descriptions.

**Important:** The clusters JSON can be very large (thousands of trace IDs with coordinates).
When the result is too large for inline display, it auto-persists to a file.
Use `print_clusters.py` from [scripts/](./scripts/) to get a readable summary.

### Step 3 — Compute metrics for clusters

For trace-level clusters, compute cost/latency/token metrics:

```sql
posthog:execute-sql
SELECT
    JSONExtractString(properties, '$ai_trace_id') as trace_id,
    sum(toFloat(properties.$ai_total_cost_usd)) as total_cost,
    max(toFloat(properties.$ai_latency)) as latency,
    sum(toInt(properties.$ai_input_tokens)) as input_tokens,
    sum(toInt(properties.$ai_output_tokens)) as output_tokens,
    countIf(properties.$ai_is_error = 'true') as error_count
FROM events
WHERE event IN ('$ai_generation', '$ai_embedding', '$ai_span')
    AND timestamp >= parseDateTimeBestEffort('<window_start>')
    AND timestamp <= parseDateTimeBestEffort('<window_end>')
    AND JSONExtractString(properties, '$ai_trace_id') IN ('<trace_id_1>', '<trace_id_2>', ...)
GROUP BY trace_id
```

For generation-level clusters, match by event UUID:

```sql
posthog:execute-sql
SELECT
    toString(uuid) as generation_id,
    toFloat(properties.$ai_total_cost_usd) as cost,
    toFloat(properties.$ai_latency) as latency,
    toInt(properties.$ai_input_tokens) as input_tokens,
    toInt(properties.$ai_output_tokens) as output_tokens,
    if(properties.$ai_is_error = 'true', 1, 0) as is_error
FROM events
WHERE event = '$ai_generation'
    AND timestamp >= parseDateTimeBestEffort('<window_start>')
    AND timestamp <= parseDateTimeBestEffort('<window_end>')
    AND toString(uuid) IN ('<gen_uuid_1>', '<gen_uuid_2>', ...)
```

### Step 4 — Drill into specific traces

Once you've identified interesting clusters, use the trace tools to inspect individual traces:

```json
posthog:query-llm-trace
{
  "traceId": "<trace_id_from_cluster>",
  "dateRange": {"date_from": "<window_start>", "date_to": "<window_end>"}
}
```

## Investigation patterns

### "What kinds of LLM usage do we have?"

1. List recent clustering runs (Step 1)
2. Load the latest run's clusters (Step 2)
3. Review cluster titles and descriptions — each represents a distinct usage pattern
4. Compare cluster sizes to understand traffic distribution

### "Which cluster is most expensive / slowest?"

1. Load clusters from a run (Step 2)
2. Extract trace IDs from each cluster
3. Compute metrics per cluster (Step 3)
4. Aggregate: `avg(cost)`, `avg(latency)`, `sum(cost)` per cluster
5. Compare across clusters

### "What's in this cluster?"

1. Load the cluster's traces (from the `traces` field)
2. Sort by `rank` (closest to centroid = most representative)
3. Inspect the top 3-5 traces via `query-llm-trace` to understand the pattern
4. Check the cluster `title` and `description` for the AI-generated summary

### "Are there error-heavy clusters?"

1. Compute metrics (Step 3) with `error_count`
2. Calculate error rate per cluster: `items_with_errors / total_items`
3. Focus on clusters with high error rates
4. Drill into errored traces to find root causes

### "How do clusters compare across runs?"

1. List multiple runs (Step 1)
2. Load clusters from each run
3. Compare cluster titles — similar titles across runs indicate stable patterns
4. Track cluster size changes to detect shifts in traffic patterns

## Constructing UI links

- **Clusters overview**: `https://app.posthog.com/ai-observability/clusters`
- **Specific run**: `https://app.posthog.com/ai-observability/clusters/<url_encoded_run_id>`
- **Cluster detail**: `https://app.posthog.com/ai-observability/clusters/<url_encoded_run_id>/<cluster_id>`

Always surface these links so the user can verify visually in the PostHog UI.

## Tips

- Always set a time range in SQL queries — cluster events without time bounds are slow
- Start with run listing to orient, then drill into specific clusters
- Cluster titles and descriptions are AI-generated summaries — verify by inspecting traces
- The noise cluster (`cluster_id: -1`) contains outliers that didn't fit any pattern
- Use `llma-clustering-job-list` to understand what clustering configs are active
- Trace IDs in clusters can be used directly with `query-llm-trace` for deep inspection
- For large clusters, inspect the top-ranked traces (closest to centroid) for representative examples

Attribution

PostHogPostHog
View sourceSee grades on GitHubMore from PostHog →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Related Skills

Caveman

Terse caveman voice: answer first, fluff gone, every technical fact kept. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief", "less tokens". Stays on until "stop caveman" or "normal mode".

1100021 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

698461 votes

Writing Skills

Create and manage Claude Code skills in HASH repository following Anthropic best practices. Use when creating new skills, modifying skill-rules.json, understanding trigger patterns, working with hooks, debugging skill activation, or implementing progressive disclosure. Covers skill structure, YAML frontmatter, trigger types (keywords, intent patterns), UserPromptSubmit hook, and the 500-line rule. Includes validation and debugging with SKILL_DEBUG. Examples include rust-error-stack, cargo-dep...

3931 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3421 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Amp, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Grok Build, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

741 votes
View all in ai-agents →