Glink Ai Use Policy

---
name: glink-ai-use-policy
description: Writes your Personal AI Use Policy on one page, with what you use Claude for and what you never do, how you disclose AI help if an employer asks and your check before anything goes public. Use for "run glink-ai-use-policy", "how do I explain my AI use", "did you use AI on your profile", "write my AI policy", "is it ok to use AI on LinkedIn", "what should I say if an employer asks about AI", "my rules for using Claude", part of the Claude for LinkedIn Networking for Recent Graduates Pack by Polar Bear.
---

# Personal AI Use Policy

## When To Use
Employers worry AI hides who graduates are, and you want a straight answer ready for "did you use AI on this?". Run this before anything goes public, to answer: what do I hand to Claude, what do I never hand over, and how do I say so honestly?

## When Not To Use
If you want one draft checked for voice and claims, run Voice Check; this page sets the standing rules that check enforces. It does not interpret your university's or employer's rules for you: read those yourself.

## Inputs
- How you have used Claude or other AI so far, in a few honest lines
- Your university's or module's AI guidance, and any employer or placement policy, if you have them
- Your Experience Inventory and Personal Voice Guide, if made
If you have none of this, I start from what you want AI to help with on LinkedIn and mark the policy as a first draft.

## Approach
The 4D framework (Delegation, Description, Discernment, Diligence) and the idea of writing a personal AI collaboration policy while staying the human in the loop, from the AI Fluency for students course by Anthropic Academy; named and linked in the sources, never copied. Alongside it, LinkedIn's Professional Community Policies, which ask for accurate information about your qualifications and experience and for synthetic media to be labelled. The judgment: a policy is worth having only if it is true of you today. The failure it prevents is the interview moment where you are asked about your AI use and improvise something vaguer than what you did.

## Workflow
1. Ask up to three questions: what you have used AI for so far, what your university or module guidance says (in your words), and whether you are on a placement or in a job with its own policy.
2. Write four short sections in your words, one per D. Delegation: what you hand to Claude (interviewing you, structuring, grammar, feedback). Description: how you brief it (your evidence rows, your voice guide). Discernment: how you judge output (every claim matches a row). Diligence: what you own (truth, permission, posting).
3. Write the "Never" list: invent experience, numbers or quotes; sit tests, interviews or assessments; write assessed work unless your university's rules allow it and you say so; automate anything on LinkedIn.
4. Draft a two-sentence disclosure answer for "did you use AI on your profile?" that is true for you, plus a one-line version for an application form.
5. Write a pre-publish check of three to five yes or no questions you run before anything goes public.
6. Mark every point that depends on your university's or employer's rules as yours to check; anything legal or contractual: check with a qualified adviser.

## Output Format
```markdown
# Personal AI Use Policy
Name: [you] · Date: [date] · Rules checked: [university guidance / employer policy / not yet]
## What I hand to Claude (Delegation)
- [task]
## How I brief it (Description)
- [my evidence rows, my voice guide]
## How I judge what it gives me (Discernment)
- [every claim matches a row; my voice, not its style]
## What I own (Diligence)
- [truth, permission, I post everything myself]
## What I never do
- [never item]
## If an employer asks
[Two true sentences.] · Form version: [one line]
## Before anything goes public
1. [Yes or no question]
## Decision
You check this page against your university's and employer's rules and sign it off as true for you, by [date].
```

## Done When
- Every line describes something you actually do, not an aspiration
- The "Never" list includes tests, assessed work and LinkedIn automation
- The disclosure answer is two sentences and true
- Points that depend on outside rules are marked for you to check

## Quality Bar
- Your own practice only; never comments on how classmates use AI.
- Plain words; no copied framework text, no policy jargon.
- University, employer and legal points are flagged "check with a qualified adviser", never stated as advice.
- Updated when your practice changes, not left as a badge.
- It never sits a test or interview for you, and assessed work only within your university's rules and with your say-so.

## Next
Run glink-linkedin-headline (LinkedIn Headline) to start the profile under these rules.

## About the makers

This pack is made by Polar Bear, a consultancy built by ex-McKinsey founders with a dream to make AI work for People, not instead of them. We help our clients build people systems and AI-first ways of working, and we run our own company on Claude. If your team has outgrown the self-serve version, message Pauline (linkedin.com/in/paulinebertry).