Parse and validate PILES (Puzzle Input Line Entry System) notation for specifying piece fusion groups in jigsawR. Covers syntax validation, parsing into group lists, plain-language explanation, adjacency verification against puzzle results, and round-trip serialization. Use when validating user-supplied PILES strings before passing to generate_puzzle(), debugging fusion group issues, explaining the notation to users, or testing round-trip parse/serialize fidelity.
Scanned 9/3/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add pjt222/agent-almanac --skill validate-piles-notation --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Validate Piles Notation?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/pjt222-validate-piles-notation-agent-almanac)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: validate-piles-notation
locale: caveman-lite
source_locale: en
source_commit: 82c77053
fence_basis_commit: 82c77053
translator: "Julius Brussee homage — caveman"
translation_date: "2026-05-03"
description: >
Parse and validate PILES (Puzzle Input Line Entry System) notation for
specifying piece fusion groups in jigsawR. Covers syntax validation,
parsing into group lists, plain-language explanation, adjacency
verification against puzzle results, and round-trip serialization. Use
when validating user-supplied PILES strings before passing to
generate_puzzle(), debugging fusion group issues, explaining the notation
to users, or testing round-trip parse/serialize fidelity.
license: MIT
allowed-tools: Read Write Edit Bash Grep Glob
metadata:
author: Philipp Thoss
version: "1.0"
domain: jigsawr
complexity: intermediate
language: R
tags: jigsawr, piles, notation, fusion, parsing, dsl
---
# Validate PILES Notation
Parse and validate PILES notation strings for puzzle piece fusion groups.
## When to Use
- Validating user-supplied PILES strings before passing to `generate_puzzle()`
- Debugging fusion group issues (wrong pieces merged, unexpected results)
- Explaining PILES notation to users in plain language
- Testing round-trip fidelity: parse -> groups -> serialize -> parse
## Inputs
- **Required**: PILES notation string (e.g., `"1-2-3,4-5"`)
- **Optional**: Puzzle result object (for adjacency validation and keyword resolution)
- **Optional**: Puzzle type (for keyword support like `"center"`, `"ring1"`, `"R1"`)
## Procedure
### Step 1: Syntax Validation
```r
library(jigsawR)
result <- validate_piles_syntax("1-2-3,4-5")
# Returns TRUE if valid, error message if invalid
```
Check for common syntax errors:
- Unmatched parentheses: `"1-2(-3)-4"` with mismatched `()`
- Invalid characters: only digits, `-`, `,`, `:`, `(`, `)` and keywords allowed
- Empty groups: `"1-2,,3-4"` (double comma)
**Got:** `TRUE` for valid syntax, descriptive error for invalid.
**If fail:** Print the exact PILES string and the validation error message.
### Step 2: Parse into Groups
```r
groups <- parse_piles("1-2-3,4-5")
# Returns: list(c(1, 2, 3), c(4, 5))
```
For strings with ranges:
```r
groups <- parse_piles("1:6,7-8")
# Returns: list(c(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6), c(7, 8))
```
**Got:** List of integer vectors, one per fusion group, with correct piece IDs and group boundaries.
**If fail:** Check that the PILES string passed syntax validation in Step 1 first. If parsing returns unexpected groups, verify that `-` separates pieces within a group and `,` separates groups, and that range notation (`:`) expands to inclusive endpoints.
### Step 3: Explain in Plain Language
Describe each group for the user:
- `"1-2-3,4-5"` -> "Group 1: fuse pieces 1, 2, and 3. Group 2: fuse pieces 4 and 5."
- `"1:6"` -> "Group 1: fuse pieces 1 through 6 (6 pieces)."
- `"center,ring1"` -> "Group 1: center piece. Group 2: all pieces in ring 1."
**Got:** Each fusion group is described in plain language with piece counts and identifiers, making the notation understandable to non-technical users.
**If fail:** If keywords cannot be explained (e.g., `"ring1"` has no clear meaning), the notation may require a puzzle result object for context. Advise the user to provide the puzzle type or use numeric piece IDs instead.
### Step 4: Validate Against Puzzle Result (Optional)
If a puzzle result object is available, verify:
```r
# Generate the puzzle first
puzzle <- generate_puzzle(type = "hexagonal", grid = c(3), size = c(200))
# Parse with puzzle context (resolves keywords)
groups <- parse_fusion("center,ring1", puzzle)
```
Check:
- All piece IDs exist in the puzzle
- Keywords resolve to valid piece sets
- Fused pieces are actually adjacent (warning if not)
**Got:** All piece IDs valid. Adjacent pieces fuse cleanly.
**If fail:** List invalid piece IDs or non-adjacent pairs.
### Step 5: Round-Trip Serialization
Verify parse/serialize fidelity:
```r
original <- "1-2-3,4-5"
groups <- parse_piles(original)
roundtrip <- to_piles(groups)
# roundtrip should equal original (or canonical equivalent)
groups2 <- parse_piles(roundtrip)
identical(groups, groups2) # Must be TRUE
```
**Got:** Round-trip produces identical group lists, confirming that `parse_piles()` and `to_piles()` are inverses.
**If fail:** If round-trip differs, check whether the serializer normalizes the notation (e.g., sorting piece IDs or converting ranges to explicit lists). Canonical differences are acceptable as long as `identical(groups, groups2)` returns `TRUE`.
## PILES Quick Reference
```text
# Basic syntax
"1-2" # Fuse pieces 1 and 2
"1-2-3,4-5" # Two groups: (1,2,3) and (4,5)
"1:6" # Range: pieces 1 through 6
# Keywords (require puzzle_result)
"center" # Center piece (hex/concentric)
"ring1" # All pieces in ring 1
"R1" # Row 1 (rectangular)
"boundary" # All boundary pieces
# Functions
parse_piles("1-2-3,4-5") # Parse PILES string
parse_fusion("1-2-3", puzzle) # Auto-detect format
to_piles(list(c(1,2), c(3,4))) # Convert to PILES
validate_piles_syntax("1-2(-3)-4") # Validate syntax
```
## Validation
- [ ] `validate_piles_syntax()` returns TRUE for valid strings
- [ ] `parse_piles()` returns correct group lists
- [ ] Round-trip serialization preserves groups
- [ ] Keywords resolve correctly with puzzle context
- [ ] Invalid syntax produces clear error messages
## Pitfalls
- **Keyword without puzzle context**: Keywords like `"center"` require a puzzle result object. Pass it to `parse_fusion()`, not `parse_piles()`.
- **1-indexed pieces**: Piece IDs start at 1, not 0.
- **Adjacent vs non-adjacent fusion**: Fusing non-adjacent pieces works but may produce unexpected visual results. Validate adjacency when possible.
- **Range notation**: `"1:6"` includes both endpoints (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6).
## Related Skills
- `generate-puzzle` — generate puzzles with fusion groups
- `add-puzzle-type` — new types need PILES/fusion support
- `run-puzzle-tests` — test PILES parsing with the full suite
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!