Complete procedure for submitting an R package to CRAN, including pre-submission checks (local, win-builder, R-hub), cran-comments.md preparation, URL and spell checking, and the submission itself. Covers first submissions and updates. Use when a package is ready for initial CRAN release, when submitting an updated version of an existing CRAN package, or when re-submitting after receiving CRAN reviewer feedback.
Scanned 9/3/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add pjt222/agent-almanac --skill submit-to-cran --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Submit To Cran?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/pjt222-submit-to-cran-49df1828)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: submit-to-cran
locale: caveman
source_locale: en
source_commit: 82c77053
fence_basis_commit: 82c77053
translator: "Julius Brussee homage — caveman"
translation_date: "2026-05-03"
description: >
Complete procedure for submitting an R package to CRAN, including
pre-submission checks (local, win-builder, R-hub), cran-comments.md
preparation, URL and spell checking, and the submission itself.
Covers first submissions and updates. Use when a package is ready for
initial CRAN release, when submitting an updated version of an existing
CRAN package, or when re-submitting after receiving CRAN reviewer feedback.
license: MIT
allowed-tools: Read Write Edit Bash Grep Glob
metadata:
author: Philipp Thoss
version: "1.0"
domain: r-packages
complexity: advanced
language: R
tags: r, cran, submission, release, publishing
---
# Submit to CRAN
Execute full CRAN submission workflow from pre-flight checks through submission.
## When Use
- Package ready for initial CRAN release
- Submitting updated version of existing CRAN package
- Re-submitting after CRAN reviewer feedback
## Inputs
- **Required**: R package passing local `R CMD check` with 0 errors and 0 warnings
- **Required**: Updated version number in DESCRIPTION
- **Required**: Updated NEWS.md with changes for this version
- **Optional**: Previous CRAN reviewer comments (for re-submissions)
## Steps
### Step 1: Version and NEWS Check
Verify DESCRIPTION has correct version:
```r
desc::desc_get_version()
```
Verify NEWS.md has entry for this version. Entry should summarize user-facing changes.
**Got:** Version follows semantic versioning. NEWS.md has matching entry for this version.
**If fail:** Update version with `usethis::use_version()` (choose "major", "minor", or "patch"). Add NEWS.md entry summarizing user-facing changes.
### Step 2: Local R CMD Check
```r
devtools::check()
```
**Got:** 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 notes (1 note acceptable for new submissions: "New submission").
**If fail:** Fix all errors and warnings before proceeding. Read check log at `<pkg>.Rcheck/00check.log` for details. Notes should be explained in cran-comments.md.
### Step 3: Spell Check
```r
devtools::spell_check()
```
Add legitimate words to `inst/WORDLIST` (one word per line, sorted alphabetical).
**Got:** No unexpected misspellings. All flagged words either corrected or added to `inst/WORDLIST`.
**If fail:** Fix genuine misspellings. Legitimate technical terms? Add to `inst/WORDLIST` (one word per line, alphabetical sorted).
### Step 4: URL Check
```r
urlchecker::url_check()
```
**Got:** All URLs return HTTP 200. No broken or redirected links.
**If fail:** Replace broken URLs. Use `\doi{}` for DOI links instead of raw URLs. Remove links to resources no longer exist.
### Step 5: Win-Builder Checks
```r
devtools::check_win_devel()
devtools::check_win_release()
```
Wait for email results (usual 15-30 minutes).
**Got:** 0 errors, 0 warnings on both Win-builder release and devel. Results arrive by email within 15-30 minutes.
**If fail:** Address platform-specific issues. Common causes: different compiler warnings, missing system dependencies, path separator differences. Fix local, re-submit to Win-builder.
### Step 6: R-hub Check
```r
rhub::rhub_check()
```
Checks on multiple platforms (Ubuntu, Windows, macOS).
**Got:** All platforms pass with 0 errors and 0 warnings.
**If fail:** Specific platform fails? Check R-hub build log for platform-specific errors. Use `testthat::skip_on_os()` or conditional code for platform-dependent behavior.
### Step 7: Prepare cran-comments.md
Create or update `cran-comments.md` in package root:
```markdown
## R CMD check results
0 errors | 0 warnings | 1 note
* This is a new release.
## Test environments
* local: Windows 11, R 4.5.0
* win-builder: R-release, R-devel
* R-hub: ubuntu-latest (R-release), windows-latest (R-release), macos-latest (R-release)
## Downstream dependencies
There are currently no downstream dependencies for this package.
```
Updates? Include:
- What changed (brief)
- Response to any previous reviewer feedback
- Reverse dependency check results if applicable
**Got:** `cran-comments.md` accurately summarizes check results across all test environments and explains any notes.
**If fail:** Check results differ across platforms? Document all variations. CRAN reviewers will check these claims against own tests.
### Step 8: Final Pre-flight
```r
# One last check
devtools::check()
# Verify the built tarball
devtools::build()
```
**Got:** Final `devtools::check()` passes clean. `.tar.gz` tarball built in parent directory.
**If fail:** Last-minute issue appears? Fix, re-run all checks from Step 2. Never submit with known failures.
### Step 9: Submit
```r
devtools::release()
```
Runs interactive checks and submits. Answer all questions honest.
Alternatively, submit manual at https://cran.r-project.org/submit.html by uploading tarball.
**Got:** Confirmation email from CRAN arrives within minutes. Click confirmation link to finalize submission.
**If fail:** Check email for rejection reasons. Common issues: examples too slow, missing `\value` tags, non-portable code. Fix issues, re-submit, note in cran-comments.md what changed.
### Step 10: Post-Submission
After acceptance:
```r
# Tag the release
usethis::use_github_release()
# Bump to development version
usethis::use_dev_version()
```
**Got:** GitHub release created with accepted version tag. DESCRIPTION bumped to development version (`x.y.z.9000`).
**If fail:** GitHub release fails? Create manual with `gh release create`. CRAN acceptance delayed? Wait for confirmation email before tagging.
## Checks
- [ ] `R CMD check` returns 0 errors, 0 warnings on local machine
- [ ] Win-builder passes (release + devel)
- [ ] R-hub passes on all tested platforms
- [ ] `cran-comments.md` accurate describes check results
- [ ] All URLs valid
- [ ] No spelling errors
- [ ] Version number correct and incremented
- [ ] NEWS.md current
- [ ] DESCRIPTION metadata complete and accurate
## Pitfalls
- **Examples too slow**: Wrap expensive examples in `\donttest{}`. CRAN enforces time limits.
- **Non-standard file/dir names**: Avoid files that trigger CRAN notes (check `.Rbuildignore`)
- **Missing `\value` in docs**: All exported functions need `@return` tag
- **Vignette build failures**: Ensure vignettes build in clean environment without your `.Renviron`
- **DESCRIPTION Title format**: Must be Title Case, no period at end, no "A Package for..."
- **Forget reverse dependency checks**: Updates? Run `revdepcheck::revdep_check()`
## Examples
```r
# Full pre-submission workflow
devtools::spell_check()
urlchecker::url_check()
devtools::check()
devtools::check_win_devel()
rhub::rhub_check()
# Wait for results...
devtools::release()
```
## See Also
- `release-package-version` - version bumping, git tagging
- `write-roxygen-docs` - ensure documentation meets CRAN standards
- `setup-github-actions-ci` - CI checks that mirror CRAN expectations
- `build-pkgdown-site` - documentation site for accepted packages
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!