Design+exec A/B tests ML models in prod → traffic split, stat significance, canary/shadow. Measure perf diffs → data-driven rollout decision. Use → validate new ver pre-rollout, compare candidates, measure biz metric impact, regulatory gradual rollout.
Scanned 9/3/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add pjt222/agent-almanac --skill run-ab-test-models --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Run Ab Test Models?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/pjt222-run-ab-test-models-fa5f4ccd)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: run-ab-test-models
locale: caveman-ultra
source_locale: en
source_commit: 82c77053
fence_basis_commit: 82c77053
translator: "Julius Brussee homage — caveman"
translation_date: "2026-05-03"
description: >
Design+exec A/B tests ML models in prod → traffic split, stat significance, canary/shadow. Measure perf diffs → data-driven rollout decision. Use → validate new ver pre-rollout, compare candidates, measure biz metric impact, regulatory gradual rollout.
license: MIT
allowed-tools: Read Write Edit Bash Grep Glob
metadata:
author: Philipp Thoss
version: "1.0"
domain: mlops
complexity: intermediate
language: multi
tags: ab-testing, canary, shadow-deployment, traffic-splitting, statistical-significance, experimentation
---
# Run A/B Test for Models
> See [Extended Examples](references/EXAMPLES.md) for complete config + templates.
Controlled experiments comparing model vers via traffic split + stat analysis.
## Use When
- Deploy new model ver → validate pre-full-rollout
- Compare candidates (diff algos|features)
- Test hyperparam impact on biz metrics
- Measure prod perf w/o full traffic risk
- Regulatory gradual rollout (medical ML)
- Cost-perf tradeoff between sizes
## In
- **Required**: Champion (current prod ver)
- **Required**: Challenger(s) (new ver)
- **Required**: Traffic alloc % (e.g. 5% → challenger)
- **Required**: Success metrics (biz + ML)
- **Required**: Min sample size|test duration
- **Optional**: Guardrail metrics (latency, err threshold)
- **Optional**: User segments → stratified test
## Do
### Step 1: Design Experiment
Test params, success criteria, stat reqs.
```python
# ab_test/experiment_config.py
from dataclasses import dataclass
from typing import List, Dict
import numpy as np
from scipy.stats import norm
@dataclass
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete implementation)
```
→ Stat-sound sample size calc, typically 5-10k/variant for 5-10% MDE.
If err: sample too large → ↑traffic alloc, ext duration, accept larger MDE; verify baseline accurate; sequential testing for continuous monitor.
### Step 2: Traffic Split
Routing → random model assign.
```python
# ab_test/traffic_router.py
import hashlib
import random
from typing import Dict, Optional
from dataclasses import dataclass
import logging
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete implementation)
```
→ Consistent user→variant, accurate split, all assigns logged.
If err: verify hash uniform (test 10k user IDs); user_id stable cross-req (not session_id); logs capture all preds; validate split first 1000 reqs.
### Step 3: Shadow Deploy (Optional)
Challenger parallel w/o user impact.
```python
# ab_test/shadow_deployment.py
import asyncio
from typing import Dict, Any
import logging
from concurrent.futures import ThreadPoolExecutor
import time
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete implementation)
```
→ Champion served normal latency, challenger logged async no-block, pred diffs captured.
If err: challenger timeout < champion SLA → no block; handle errs gracefully → no champion impact; monitor mem (2 models loaded); sample (log 10% shadow preds).
### Step 4: Collect+Analyze Metrics
Gather data → stat tests.
```python
# ab_test/analysis.py
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
from typing import Dict, Tuple
import logging
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete implementation)
```
→ Stat results w/ p-vals, CIs, clear decision (rollout|keep|inconclusive), typically 7-14d|sample size hit.
If err: verify ground truth labels (may need delayed analysis); SRM check (assign bugs); sufficient sample; novelty/primacy in early data; sequential if fixed-horizon slow.
### Step 5: Monitor Guardrails
Continuous check → challenger no safety violation.
```python
# ab_test/guardrails.py
import pandas as pd
import logging
from typing import Dict, List
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete implementation)
```
→ Violations detected 5-15min, auto-stop if critical breach (latency, errs), team alerts.
If err: thresholds realistic (not too tight); monitor loop running; stop_experiment() updates routing; test alert delivery.
### Step 6: Rollout Decision
Based on results → decide rollout.
```python
# ab_test/rollout_decision.py
import logging
from typing import Dict
from dataclasses import dataclass
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete implementation)
```
→ Clear decision (full|gradual|keep|extend) + justification + actions.
If err: unclear → subgroup analysis (segment, time, device); interaction effects; biz ctx (2% lift worth eng cost?); consult stakeholders.
## Check
- [ ] Traffic split matches configured (within 1%)
- [ ] Same user → same variant (consistency)
- [ ] Sample size reasonable (5-50k/variant)
- [ ] Stat tests p-vals match manual calc
- [ ] Guardrail violations → alerts <5min
- [ ] Shadow shows <5% pred divergence
- [ ] Reports include CIs
- [ ] Decision documented w/ justification
## Traps
- **SRM**: Observed split ≠ configured (95/5→92/8) → assign bug; check hash uniformity
- **Peeking**: Check before sample size inflates Type I; sequential test or wait for end date
- **Novelty**: Users respond diff initially; run 2+ wks for steady state
- **Carryover**: Prev exposure affects current; new users|washout
- **Multi-test**: Many metrics ↑false pos; Bonferroni or single primary
- **Insufficient power**: Small alloc → months for realistic effects; balance power vs risk
- **Ignore segments**: Aggregate lift hides neg impact on segments; subgroup analysis
- **Attribution errs**: Outcome metrics correctly attributed to preds (not other changes)
## →
- `deploy-ml-model-serving` — deploy infra + versioning
- `monitor-model-drift` — ongoing perf monitor post-rollout
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!