Design and execute A/B tests for ML models in production using traffic splitting, statistical significance testing, and canary/shadow deployment strategies. Measure performance differences and make data-driven decisions about model rollout. Use when validating a new model version before full rollout, comparing candidate models trained with different algorithms, measuring business metric impact of model changes, or when regulatory requirements mandate gradual rollout.
Scanned 5/29/2026
Install via CLI
openskills install pjt222/agent-almanac---
name: run-ab-test-models
description: >
Design and execute A/B tests for ML models in production using traffic splitting,
statistical significance testing, and canary/shadow deployment strategies. Measure
performance differences and make data-driven decisions about model rollout. Use when
validating a new model version before full rollout, comparing candidate models trained
with different algorithms, measuring business metric impact of model changes, or when
regulatory requirements mandate gradual rollout.
license: MIT
allowed-tools: Read Write Edit Bash Grep Glob
metadata:
author: Philipp Thoss
version: "1.0"
domain: mlops
complexity: intermediate
language: multi
tags: ab-testing, canary, shadow-deployment, traffic-splitting, statistical-significance, experimentation
locale: es
source_locale: en
source_commit: a87e5e03
translator: claude
translation_date: "2026-03-17"
---
# Run A/B Test for Models
> See [Extended Examples](references/EXAMPLES.md) for complete configuration files and templates.
Execute controlled experiments comparing model versions using traffic splitting and statistical analysis.
## Cuándo Usar
- Deploying new model version and want to validate improvement before full rollout
- Comparing multiple candidate models trained with different algorithms or features
- Testing impact of hyperparameter changes on business metrics
- Need to measure model performance in production without risking full traffic
- Regulatory requirements for gradual rollout (e.g., medical ML systems)
- Evaluating cost-performance tradeoffs between model sizes
## Entradas
- **Requerido**: Champion model (current production version)
- **Requerido**: Challenger model(s) (new version to test)
- **Requerido**: Traffic allocation percentage (e.g., 5% to challenger)
- **Requerido**: Success metrics (business and ML metrics)
- **Requerido**: Minimum sample size or test duration
- **Opcional**: Guardrail metrics (latency, error rate thresholds)
- **Opcional**: User segments for stratified testing
## Procedimiento
### Paso 1: Design Experiment
Define test parameters, success criteria, and statistical requirements.
```python
# ab_test/experiment_config.py
from dataclasses import dataclass
from typing import List, Dict
import numpy as np
from scipy.stats import norm
@dataclass
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete implementation)
```
**Esperado:** Experiment configuration with statistically sound sample size calculation, typically 5-10k samples per variant for 5-10% MDE.
**En caso de fallo:** If required sample size too large, increase traffic allocation, extend test duration, or accept larger MDE; verify baseline metric estimate is accurate; consider sequential testing for continuous monitoring.
### Paso 2: Implement Traffic Splitting
Set up routing logic to randomly assign requests to models.
```python
# ab_test/traffic_router.py
import hashlib
import random
from typing import Dict, Optional
from dataclasses import dataclass
import logging
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete implementation)
```
**Esperado:** Consistent user-to-variant assignment, accurate traffic split matching configured percentages, all assignments logged for analysis.
**En caso de fallo:** Verify hash function produces uniform distribution (test with 10k user IDs), check that user_id is stable across requests (not session_id), ensure logs capture all prediction events, validate traffic split in first 1000 requests.
### Paso 3: Implement Shadow Deployment (Optional)
Run challenger model in parallel without affecting users (shadow mode).
```python
# ab_test/shadow_deployment.py
import asyncio
from typing import Dict, Any
import logging
from concurrent.futures import ThreadPoolExecutor
import time
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete implementation)
```
**Esperado:** Champion predictions served with normal latency, challenger predictions logged asynchronously without blocking, prediction differences captured for analysis.
**En caso de fallo:** Set challenger timeout < champion SLA to avoid blocking, handle challenger errors gracefully without affecting champion, monitor memory usage (two models loaded), consider sampling (log only 10% of shadow predictions).
### Paso 4: Collect and Analyze Metrics
Gather experiment data and perform statistical tests.
```python
# ab_test/analysis.py
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
from typing import Dict, Tuple
import logging
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete implementation)
```
**Esperado:** Statistical test results with p-values, confidence intervals, and clear decision (rollout/keep/inconclusive), typically after 7-14 days or reaching sample size.
**En caso de fallo:** Verify ground truth labels are available (may need delayed analysis), check for sample ratio mismatch (SRM) indicating assignment bugs, ensure sufficient sample size reached, look for novelty/primacy effects in early data, consider sequential testing if fixed-horizon test is too slow.
### Paso 5: Monitor Guardrail Metrics
Continuously check that challenger doesn't violate safety thresholds.
```python
# ab_test/guardrails.py
import pandas as pd
import logging
from typing import Dict, List
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete implementation)
```
**Esperado:** Guardrail violations detected within 5-15 minutes, automated experiment stop if critical thresholds breached (latency, errors), alerts sent to team.
**En caso de fallo:** Verify guardrail thresholds are realistic (not too tight), ensure monitoring loop is running continuously, check that stop_experiment() function actually updates routing, test alert delivery channels.
### Paso 6: Make Rollout Decision
Based on experiment results, decide whether to rollout challenger.
```python
# ab_test/rollout_decision.py
import logging
from typing import Dict
from dataclasses import dataclass
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete implementation)
```
**Esperado:** Clear decision (full/gradual rollout, keep champion, or extend test) with justification and action items.
**En caso de fallo:** If decision unclear, perform subgroup analysis (by user segment, time of day, device type), check for interaction effects, review business context (e.g., is 2% lift worth engineering cost?), consult with stakeholders.
## Validación
- [ ] Traffic split matches configured percentages (within 1%)
- [ ] Same user always assigned to same variant (consistency check)
- [ ] Sample size calculation produces reasonable numbers (5-50k per variant)
- [ ] Statistical tests produce p-values consistent with manual calculation
- [ ] Guardrail violations trigger alerts within 5 minutes
- [ ] Shadow deployment shows <5% prediction divergence between models
- [ ] Experiment reports include confidence intervals
- [ ] Rollout decision documented with justification
## Errores Comunes
- **Sample ratio mismatch (SRM)**: If observed traffic split differs from configured (e.g., 95/5 becomes 92/8), indicates assignment bug; check hash function uniformity
- **Peeking**: Checking results before reaching sample size inflates Type I error; use sequential testing or wait for pre-determined end date
- **Novelty effect**: Users respond differently to new model initially; run for 2+ weeks to see steady-state behavior
- **Carryover effects**: Previous variant exposure affects current behavior; use new users or sufficient washout period
- **Multiple testing**: Testing many metrics increases false positive risk; correct with Bonferroni or focus on single primary metric
- **Insufficient power**: Small traffic allocation may require months to detect realistic effects; balance statistical power with risk tolerance
- **Ignoring segments**: Aggregate lift may hide negative impact on important user segments; perform subgroup analysis
- **Attribution errors**: Ensure outcome metrics correctly attributed to model predictions (not other system changes)
## Habilidades Relacionadas
- `deploy-ml-model-serving` - Model deployment infrastructure and versioning
- `monitor-model-drift` - Ongoing performance monitoring post-rollout
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!