Plan a software release cycle with milestones, feature freezes, release candidates, and go/no-go criteria. Covers calendar-based and feature-based release strategies. Use when starting planning for a major or minor version release, transitioning from ad-hoc to structured release cadence, coordinating a release across multiple teams or components, defining quality gates for a regulated project, or planning the first public release (v1.0.0) of a project.
Scanned 9/3/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add pjt222/agent-almanac --skill plan-release-cycle --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Plan Release Cycle?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/pjt222-plan-release-cycle-ddbe6fe3)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: plan-release-cycle
locale: wenyan-ultra
source_locale: en
source_commit: 82c77053
translator: "Julius Brussee homage — caveman"
translation_date: "2026-04-26"
description: >
Plan a software release cycle with milestones, feature freezes,
release candidates, and go/no-go criteria. Covers calendar-based
and feature-based release strategies. Use when starting planning for a
major or minor version release, transitioning from ad-hoc to structured
release cadence, coordinating a release across multiple teams or components,
defining quality gates for a regulated project, or planning the first
public release (v1.0.0) of a project.
license: MIT
allowed-tools: Read Write Grep Glob
metadata:
author: Philipp Thoss
version: "1.0"
domain: versioning
complexity: intermediate
language: multi
tags: versioning, release-planning, milestones, release-cycle
---
# 計發週
立發週含碑、凍、候、行否則。產 `RELEASE-PLAN.md` 引團自開至發。
## 用
- 主或次版發起劃→用
- 自隨發轉構發節→用
- 多團或組件發協→用
- 定規制案之質閘與發則→用
- 計首公發 (v1.0.0)→用
## 入
- **必**:標版號(如 v2.0.0)
- **必**:欲發日或窗
- **必**:計功列或範(積、圖、述)
- **可**:團大與餘
- **可**:發策偏(曆基或功基)
- **可**:影發之規或循需
- **可**:前發速或週時資
## 行
### 一:定發策
擇二主策:
**曆基**(時箱):
- 定期發(如每 4 週、季)
- 未備之功延次發
- 為用者與下游可料
- 宜:庫、框、有外消之具
**功基**(範驅):
- 定功備乃發
- 日按範調
- 險:範蔓、無期延
- 宜:內具、首發、大重寫
多計合混:定標日含定範、留 1-2 週緩。緩限未達→延餘功。
記策擇與由。
得:發策有由合案況。
敗:團不能合策→默為曆基含功序列。時箱迫序決。
### 二:定碑
分週為段含標日:
```markdown
## Release Plan: v2.0.0
### Timeline
| Phase | Start | End | Duration | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Development | 2026-02-17 | 2026-03-14 | 4 weeks | Active feature development |
| Feature Freeze | 2026-03-15 | 2026-03-15 | 1 day | No new features merged after this date |
| Stabilization | 2026-03-15 | 2026-03-21 | 1 week | Bug fixes, documentation, testing only |
| RC1 | 2026-03-22 | 2026-03-22 | 1 day | First release candidate tagged |
| RC Testing | 2026-03-22 | 2026-03-28 | 1 week | Community/team testing of RC |
| RC2 (if needed) | 2026-03-29 | 2026-03-29 | 1 day | Second RC if critical issues found |
| Go/No-Go | 2026-03-31 | 2026-03-31 | 1 day | Final decision meeting |
| Release | 2026-04-01 | 2026-04-01 | 1 day | Tag, publish, announce |
```
常段時:
- **Development**:總 50-70%
- **Stabilization**:總 15-25%
- **RC testing**:總 10-20%
得:碑表含日、時、各段述。
敗:時過迫(穩 < 1 週)→延發或減範。永勿略穩。
### 三:定凍則
定此發之「凍」義:
```markdown
### Feature Freeze Criteria
After feature freeze (2026-03-15):
- **Allowed**: Bug fixes, test additions, documentation updates, dependency security patches
- **Not allowed**: New features, API changes, refactoring, dependency upgrades (non-security)
- **Exception process**: Feature freeze exceptions require written justification and approval from [release owner]
### Feature Priority List
| Priority | Feature | Status | Owner | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P0 (must) | New export format | In progress | [Name] | Blocks release |
| P0 (must) | Security audit fixes | Not started | [Name] | Compliance requirement |
| P1 (should) | Performance optimization | In progress | [Name] | Defer if not ready |
| P2 (nice) | Dark mode support | Not started | [Name] | Defer to v2.1.0 if needed |
```
P0 阻發。P1 備則含。P2 延而不延期。
得:凍則記含例程與序功列。
敗:P0 險誤凍→即升。選:延開段、分功為小品、延至點發 (v2.0.1)。
### 四:計候程
定候如何產與試:
````markdown
### Release Candidate Process
1. **RC1 Tag**: Tag from the stabilization branch after all P0 features merged and CI green
```bash
git tag -a v2.0.0-rc.1 -m "Release candidate 1 for v2.0.0"
```
2. **RC Distribution**: Publish RC to staging/testing channel
- R: `install.packages("pkg", repos = "https://staging.r-universe.dev/user")`
- Node.js: `npm install pkg@next`
- Internal: Deploy to staging environment
3. **RC Testing Period**: 5-7 business days
- Run full test suite including integration tests
- Verify all P0 features work as documented
- Test upgrade path from previous version
- Check for regressions in existing functionality
4. **RC Evaluation**:
- **No critical/high bugs**: Proceed to release
- **Critical bugs found**: Fix, tag RC2, restart testing period
- **More than 2 RCs needed**: Revisit scope and timeline
5. **RC2+ Tags**: Only if critical issues found in previous RC
```bash
git tag -a v2.0.0-rc.2 -m "Release candidate 2 for v2.0.0"
```
````
得:候程記含標規、布法、試清單、升則。
敗:候程略(壓發)→記險。未試發回滾率高。
### 五:定行否清單
立發批前必達之則:
```markdown
### Go/No-Go Checklist
#### Must Pass (release blocked if any fail)
- [ ] All CI checks passing on release branch
- [ ] Zero critical bugs open against this version
- [ ] Zero high-severity security vulnerabilities
- [ ] All P0 features verified and documented
- [ ] Changelog complete and reviewed
- [ ] Upgrade path tested from previous version (v1.x -> v2.0.0)
- [ ] License and attribution files up to date
#### Should Pass (release proceeds with documented risk)
- [ ] Zero high bugs open (non-critical)
- [ ] All P1 features included
- [ ] Performance benchmarks within acceptable range
- [ ] Documentation reviewed and spell-checked
- [ ] External dependencies at latest stable versions
#### Decision
- **Go**: All "Must Pass" items checked, majority of "Should Pass" items checked
- **No-Go**: Any "Must Pass" item unchecked
- **Conditional Go**: All "Must Pass" checked, significant "Should Pass" items unchecked — document accepted risks
```
得:行否清單明過敗則與決。
敗:會果為否→識阻項、派主、設新標日(常 1-2 週後)、更發計。
### 六:記回滾
定發致產要事時如何回:
```markdown
### Rollback Plan
#### Rollback Triggers
- Critical bug affecting >10% of users
- Data corruption or loss
- Security vulnerability introduced by the release
- Breaking change not documented in changelog
#### Rollback Procedure
1. **Revert package registry**: Unpublish or yank the release
- R/CRAN: Contact CRAN maintainers (cannot self-unpublish)
- npm: `npm unpublish pkg@2.0.0` (within 72 hours)
- GitHub: Mark release as pre-release, publish point fix
2. **Communicate**: Notify users via GitHub issue, mailing list, or social channels
- Template: "v2.0.0 has been rolled back due to [issue]. Please use v1.x.y until a fix is released."
3. **Fix forward**: Prefer a v2.0.1 patch release over a full rollback when possible
4. **Post-mortem**: Conduct a post-mortem within 48 hours of rollback to identify process gaps
#### Point Release Policy
- v2.0.1 for critical bug fixes within 1 week of release
- v2.0.2 for additional fixes within 2 weeks
- Patch releases do not require full RC cycle but must pass CI and critical test suite
```
書全發計於 `RELEASE-PLAN.md` 或 `RELEASE-PLAN-v2.0.0.md`。
得:回滾計記含觸、程、訊版、點發策。完 RELEASE-PLAN.md 已書。
敗:回滾不可(如庫遷已施)→記前修程。每發當有復路。
## 驗
- [ ] 發策(曆/功/混)有由
- [ ] 碑表含諸段日:開、凍、穩、候、發
- [ ] 凍則含許/禁變型
- [ ] 功序列分(P0 必/P1 宜/P2 佳)
- [ ] 候程記:標、布、試、升
- [ ] 行否含明「必過」與「宜過」段
- [ ] 回滾含觸、程、訊版
- [ ] RELEASE-PLAN.md(或等)文已立
- [ ] 時實(穩 ≥ 總 15%)
## 忌
- **無穩段**:直自開至發。即 3 日穩亦捉開時掩之事
- **凍後範蔓**:凍後許「只多一」。凍後加皆重試、引退險
- **忽 P0 險**:P0 險不早升。範早調則時擾少
- **「小」發略候**:即次發益於至少一候。一日候試廉於發後熱修
- **無回滾**:假發必成。每計當答「若敗則何」於發前
- **曆壓越質**:因諾日而發、即敗行否亦發。延發小擾;破發為信失
## 參
- `apply-semantic-versioning` -- 定發版號
- `manage-changelog` -- 養變誌入發注
- `plan-sprint` -- 開段內衝刺計
- `draft-project-charter` -- 案章定發圖與成則
- `generate-status-report` -- 追進對碑
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!