Field identification of minerals and ores using hardness, streak, luster, cleavage, crystal habit, and simple chemical tests. Covers the systematic elimination methodology, Mohs scale application, and common ore indicators for precious metals, gemstones, and industrial minerals. Use when encountering an unknown rock or mineral specimen, when prospecting and assessing whether a site shows valuable mineral indicators, when distinguishing ore-bearing rock from barren rock in the field, or when b...
Scanned 9/3/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add pjt222/agent-almanac --skill mineral-identification --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Mineral Identification?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/pjt222-mineral-identification-d2c684c2)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: mineral-identification
description: >
Field identification of minerals and ores using hardness, streak, luster,
cleavage, crystal habit, and simple chemical tests. Covers the systematic
elimination methodology, Mohs scale application, and common ore indicators
for precious metals, gemstones, and industrial minerals. Use when encountering
an unknown rock or mineral specimen, when prospecting and assessing whether a
site shows valuable mineral indicators, when distinguishing ore-bearing rock
from barren rock in the field, or when building geological literacy through
systematic observation.
license: MIT
allowed-tools: Read
metadata:
author: Philipp Thoss
version: "1.0"
domain: prospecting
complexity: intermediate
language: natural
tags: prospecting, minerals, geology, identification, hardness, streak, field-geology
---
# Mineral Identification
Identify minerals in the field using physical properties, systematic elimination, and simple field tests.
## When to Use
- You find an unknown rock or mineral specimen and want to identify it
- You are prospecting and need to assess whether a site shows indicators of valuable minerals
- You want to distinguish ore-bearing rock from barren rock in the field
- You are building geological literacy through systematic observation
## Inputs
- **Required**: A mineral specimen or outcrop to examine
- **Optional**: Streak plate (unglazed porcelain tile or bathroom tile back)
- **Optional**: Steel nail or knife blade (hardness ~5.5)
- **Optional**: Glass plate (hardness ~5.5)
- **Optional**: Copper coin (hardness ~3.5)
- **Optional**: Hand lens (10x)
- **Optional**: Dilute hydrochloric acid (10% HCl) for carbonate test
## Procedure
### Step 1: Observe Without Touching
Before handling, observe the specimen in context.
```text
Field Context:
+--------------------+------------------------------------------+
| Observation | Record |
+--------------------+------------------------------------------+
| Host rock | What type of rock is it in/on? |
| | (granite, basite, sandstone, schist...) |
+--------------------+------------------------------------------+
| Geological setting | Vein, disseminated, massive, placer, |
| | weathering surface, cave deposit |
+--------------------+------------------------------------------+
| Associated | What other minerals are nearby? |
| minerals | (quartz veins often host gold; iron |
| | staining suggests oxidation zone) |
+--------------------+------------------------------------------+
| Crystal form | Visible crystals? Habit? Size? |
| (if visible) | (cubic, prismatic, tabular, massive) |
+--------------------+------------------------------------------+
```
**Expected:** Field context recorded before handling the specimen.
**On failure:** If geological context is unclear (loose specimen, urban find), proceed with physical properties only — context would have helped narrow candidates but is not strictly required.
### Step 2: Test Physical Properties
Apply the diagnostic tests systematically.
```text
Diagnostic Property Tests:
LUSTER (how it reflects light):
- Metallic: reflects like metal (pyrite, galena, gold)
- Vitreous: glassy (quartz, feldspar)
- Pearly: like a pearl (muscovite, talc surfaces)
- Silky: like silk fibers (asbestos, satin spar gypsum)
- Earthy/dull: no reflection (kaolin, limonite)
- Adamantine: brilliant, diamond-like (diamond, zircon)
HARDNESS (Mohs scale — scratch test):
+------+-----------+----------------------------------+
| Mohs | Reference | Can Be Scratched By |
+------+-----------+----------------------------------+
| 1 | Talc | Fingernail |
| 2 | Gypsum | Fingernail (barely) |
| 3 | Calcite | Copper coin |
| 4 | Fluorite | Steel nail (easily) |
| 5 | Apatite | Steel nail (just) |
| 6 | Feldspar | Steel nail cannot scratch |
| 7 | Quartz | Scratches glass |
| 8 | Topaz | Scratches quartz |
| 9 | Corundum | Scratches topaz |
| 10 | Diamond | Scratches everything |
+------+-----------+----------------------------------+
Test: try to scratch the specimen with each reference tool,
starting from soft to hard. The hardness is between the tool
that fails and the tool that succeeds.
STREAK (powder colour on porcelain):
- Drag the specimen firmly across an unglazed porcelain tile
- Record the colour of the powder line
- Streak colour is often different from specimen colour
- Critical: hematite is grey-black but streaks RED
- Critical: pyrite is gold but streaks BLACK
- Minerals harder than the streak plate (~7) will not leave a streak
CLEAVAGE AND FRACTURE:
- Cleavage: breaks along flat planes (mica: 1 direction, feldspar: 2)
- Fracture: breaks irregularly (conchoidal = curved like glass, uneven, fibrous)
- Note number of cleavage directions and angles between them
SPECIFIC GRAVITY (heft test):
- Hold the specimen and assess: does it feel heavier or lighter
than expected for its size?
- Heavy: possible metallic ore (galena, gold, magnetite)
- Light: possible pumice, sulfur, or organic material
```
**Expected:** A profile of the specimen: luster, hardness range, streak colour, cleavage/fracture type, and relative density.
**On failure:** If a property is ambiguous (e.g., luster between metallic and vitreous — "sub-metallic"), record both options. Ambiguity reduces confidence but does not prevent identification.
### Step 3: Apply Special Tests
Additional tests for specific mineral groups.
```text
Special Field Tests:
MAGNETISM:
- Hold a magnet near the specimen
- Strong attraction: magnetite (or possibly pyrrhotite)
- Weak attraction: some iron-bearing minerals
ACID TEST (10% HCl):
- Drop acid on the specimen surface
- Vigorous fizzing: calcite (CaCO3)
- Fizzing on powder only: dolomite (scratch surface first, then apply acid)
- No fizzing: not a carbonate
TASTE (only for suspected halite):
- Salty taste: halite (NaCl)
- Do NOT taste unknown minerals generally — some are toxic
SMELL:
- Sulfur: rotten egg smell (sulfides when scratched)
- Clay: earthy "petrichor" smell when breathed on (clay minerals)
TENACITY:
- Brittle: shatters when struck (most silicates)
- Malleable: deforms without breaking (gold, copper, silver)
- Flexible: bends and stays (chlorite, some micas)
- Elastic: bends and springs back (muscovite mica)
```
**Expected:** Additional diagnostic data that narrows the identification further.
**On failure:** If special tests are unavailable (no magnet, no acid), proceed with the basic properties — they are sufficient for most common minerals.
### Step 4: Identify by Elimination
Cross-reference the property profile against known minerals.
```text
Common Mineral Identification Key (simplified):
METALLIC LUSTER:
- Black streak + hard (6+) + cubic crystals = PYRITE
- Black streak + soft (2.5) + heavy + cubic = GALENA
- Red-brown streak + hard (5-6) + heavy = HEMATITE
- Yellow streak + soft (1.5-2.5) + yellow = GOLD (if malleable)
or CHALCOPYRITE (if brittle, harder, green-black streak)
- Black streak + magnetic = MAGNETITE
NON-METALLIC, LIGHT-COLORED:
- Vitreous + hard (7) + conchoidal fracture = QUARTZ
- Vitreous + hard (6) + 2 cleavage planes = FELDSPAR
- Vitreous + soft (3) + fizzes in acid = CALCITE
- Pearly + very soft (1) + greasy feel = TALC
- Vitreous + soft (2) + 1 perfect cleavage = GYPSUM
NON-METALLIC, DARK-COLORED:
- Vitreous + hard (5-6) + 2 cleavage at ~90 degrees = PYROXENE
- Vitreous + hard (5-6) + 2 cleavage at ~60/120 degrees = AMPHIBOLE
- Vitreous + soft (2.5-3) + 1 perfect cleavage + flexible = BIOTITE (mica)
```
**Expected:** A mineral identification or a shortlist of 2-3 candidates with the distinguishing test needed to differentiate them.
**On failure:** If the specimen does not match any common mineral, it may be a rock (aggregate of minerals) rather than a single mineral, or it may require laboratory analysis (thin section, XRD).
## Validation
- [ ] Field context was recorded before handling
- [ ] Luster was assessed under natural light
- [ ] Hardness was tested against at least two reference materials
- [ ] Streak colour was recorded (if specimen is softer than streak plate)
- [ ] Cleavage or fracture pattern was noted
- [ ] Identification was reached by systematic elimination, not guessing
- [ ] Look-alike minerals were explicitly considered and differentiated
## Common Pitfalls
- **Confusing pyrite with gold**: "Fool's gold" (pyrite) is harder (6 vs 2.5), brittle (gold is malleable), and streaks black (gold streaks gold). The tests are definitive — use them
- **Ignoring streak**: Specimen colour is unreliable (hematite can be grey, red, or black). Streak colour is consistent and diagnostic
- **Scratching with contaminated tools**: A steel nail with rust produces a false streak. Clean test tools before use
- **Assuming crystal habit**: Many minerals rarely show well-formed crystals in the field. Massive or granular forms are more common — do not require visible crystals for identification
- **Confusing weathered surface with true colour**: Break the specimen to expose a fresh surface before testing. Weathering rinds can completely disguise the mineral beneath
## Related Skills
- `gold-washing` — alluvial gold recovery uses mineral identification skills to read stream deposits and assess gold-bearing gravels
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!