Manage engagement buffer ingesting, prioritizing, rate-limiting, deduping, tracking state for incoming engagement items across platforms. Gen periodic digests + enforces cooldown periods. Composes w/ du-dum: du-dum sets observation/action cadence, this skill manages queue between beats.
Scanned 9/3/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add pjt222/agent-almanac --skill manage-engagement-buffer --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Manage Engagement Buffer?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/pjt222-manage-engagement-buffer-9ef2cce5)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: manage-engagement-buffer
locale: caveman-ultra
source_locale: en
source_commit: 82c77053
fence_basis_commit: 82c77053
translator: "Julius Brussee homage — caveman"
translation_date: "2026-04-24"
description: >
Manage engagement buffer ingesting, prioritizing, rate-limiting, deduping,
tracking state for incoming engagement items across platforms. Gen periodic
digests + enforces cooldown periods. Composes w/ du-dum: du-dum sets
observation/action cadence, this skill manages queue between beats.
license: MIT
allowed-tools: Read Write Edit Bash Grep Glob
metadata:
author: Philipp Thoss
version: "1.0"
domain: general
complexity: intermediate
language: multi
tags: engagement, buffer, queue, rate-limiting, deduplication, digest, cooldown, autonomous-agents
---
# Manage Engagement Buffer
Ingest, dedup, prioritize, rate-limit incoming engagement items across platforms → hand off compact digest to action clock. Buffer between raw platform signals + deliberate action: absorbs bursts, merges dups, enforces cooldowns, ensures agent acts on highest-value first. W/o buffer → agent either processes in arrival order (missing urgent buried in noise) or attempts everything at once (hitting rate limits + spammy).
Composes w/ `du-dum`: du-dum decides *when* to observe + act; this skill decides *what* deserves action. Buffer = queue accumulating between du-dum's beats.
## Use When
- Autonomous agent receives > engagement than can process per cycle
- Dup / near-dup items waste action budget
- Engagement needs priority ordering before action clock fires
- Cooldowns needed → prevent over-engagement / rate limiting
- Multi platform sources (GitHub, Slack, email) feed single agent's action loop
## In
- **Req**: `buffer_path` — path to JSONL buffer file
- **Opt**: `platform_config` — per-platform rate limits + cooldown settings
- **Opt**: `digest_size` — # top items in digest (default 5)
- **Opt**: `ttl_hours` — TTL for unacted items (default 48)
- **Opt**: `cooldown_minutes` — per-thread cooldown after action (default 60)
## Do
### Step 1: Define Buffer Schema
Design engagement item structure. Each in buffer = single JSON line:
```json
{
"id": "gh-notif-20260408-001",
"source": "github:pjt222/agent-almanac",
"timestamp": "2026-04-08T09:15:00Z",
"content_summary": "PR #218 review requested by contributor",
"priority": 4,
"state": "new",
"dedup_key": "github:pjt222/agent-almanac:pr-218:contributor-name",
"thread_id": "pr-218",
"ttl_hours": 48
}
```
Field definitions:
| Field | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| `id` | string | Unique identifier (source prefix + date + sequence) |
| `source` | string | Platform and channel (`github:repo`, `slack:channel`, `email:inbox`) |
| `timestamp` | ISO 8601 | When the item was ingested |
| `content_summary` | string | One-line description of the engagement item |
| `priority` | int 1-5 | Composite priority (see Step 4) |
| `state` | enum | `new`, `acknowledged`, `acted`, `cooldown`, `merged`, `expired` |
| `dedup_key` | string | Composite key: source + thread + author |
| `thread_id` | string | Conversation thread identifier for cooldown tracking |
| `ttl_hours` | int | Hours until item expires if unacted (default: 48) |
Store JSONL (one JSON per line). Supports append-only writes, line-by-line processing, easy pruning by rewriting w/o expired lines.
→ JSONL buffer init at `buffer_path` w/ schema documented. Stable enough to support downstream.
**If err:** Buffer file can't be created (perms, path) → fallback in-mem list for current cycle + log err. Don't silently drop items.
### Step 2: Implement Ingestion
Accept items from platform adapters → append to buffer w/ initial priority.
Priority by item type:
| Type | Priority | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Direct mention (@agent) | 5 | Someone explicitly asked for attention |
| Review request | 4 | Blocking someone else's work |
| Reply in tracked thread | 3 | Active conversation the agent participates in |
| Notification (assigned, subscribed) | 2 | Informational, may require action |
| Broadcast (release, announcement) | 1 | Awareness only, rarely actionable |
Per incoming:
1. Construct item JSON from schema
2. Assign initial priority
3. Set `state=new`
4. Set `timestamp` = UTC now
5. Gen `dedup_key` from source + thread + author
6. Append JSON line to buffer file
```text
# Pseudocode: ingest from GitHub adapter
for notification in github_adapter.fetch():
item = build_item(notification)
item.priority = priority_by_type(notification.reason)
item.state = "new"
append_jsonl(buffer_path, item)
log("ingested {item.id} priority={item.priority}")
```
→ New items in buffer w/ correct priorities + `state=new`. Each adapter produces well-formed items independently — failures don't block others.
**If err:** Platform adapter fails (auth expired, rate limited, network down) → log + skip source for cycle. Don't clear existing — stale > empty.
### Step 3: Dedupe
Scan buffer for items sharing `dedup_key` within configurable window (default 24h). Keep highest-priority, mark others merged.
1. Group by `dedup_key`
2. Per group → sort priority desc, timestamp desc
3. Keep first (highest priority, most recent); mark rest `state=merged`
4. Detect thread bursts: same `thread_id` w/ diff authors within 1h = burst → consolidate into single item w/ participant count appended to `content_summary`
```text
# Dedup logic
groups = group_by(buffer, "dedup_key", window_hours=24)
for key, items in groups:
if len(items) > 1:
keeper = max(items, key=lambda i: (i.priority, i.timestamp))
for item in items:
if item.id != keeper.id:
item.state = "merged"
# Thread burst detection
thread_groups = group_by(buffer, "thread_id", window_hours=1)
for thread_id, items in thread_groups:
active_items = [i for i in items if i.state == "new"]
if len(active_items) >= 3:
keeper = max(active_items, key=lambda i: i.priority)
keeper.content_summary += f" ({len(active_items)} participants)"
for item in active_items:
if item.id != keeper.id:
item.state = "merged"
```
→ Buffer has no dup `dedup_key` w/in window. Thread bursts collapsed into single items w/ participant counts. Merged remain in file (audit) but excluded from downstream.
**If err:** Dedup produces unexpected merges (legit distinct items sharing key) → narrow dedup window / refine key construction. Adding content hash distinguishes items sharing source+thread+author but diff content.
### Step 4: Prioritize
Re-sort by composite score (recency decay + escalation).
Composite score formula:
```text
score = base_priority * recency_weight * escalation_factor
recency_weight = 0.9 ^ hours_since_ingestion
escalation_factor = 1.0 + (resubmission_count * 0.2)
# Cap effective priority at 5
effective_priority = min(5, score)
```
Behavior:
- P-3 item 0h ago: `3 * 1.0 * 1.0 = 3.0`
- P-3 item 8h ago: `3 * 0.43 * 1.0 = 1.29` (decayed below P-2)
- P-2 resubmitted 2×: `2 * 1.0 * 1.4 = 2.8` (escalated near P-3)
Sort `state=new` items by `effective_priority` desc. Sorted order → digest (Step 6).
→ Buffer sorted by score. Fresh high-priority at top. Old decayed. Resubmitted escalated. No item > 5.
**If err:** Scoring produces unintuitive rankings (1h-old P-2 > fresh P-3) → adjust decay. 0.95/h gentler; 0.85/h aggressive. Tune to match tempo.
### Step 5: Rate Limits + Cooldowns
Prevent over-engaging → per-platform write limits + per-thread cooldowns.
**Per-platform** (via `platform_config`):
| Platform | Default limit | Window |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub comments | 1 per 20 seconds | rolling |
| GitHub reviews | 3 per hour | rolling |
| Slack messages | 1 per 10 seconds | rolling |
| Email replies | 5 per hour | rolling |
**Per-thread cooldown:** After acting → thread in cooldown for `cooldown_minutes` (default 60). During cooldown, new items for thread ingested but not surfaced in digest.
**Err backoff:** On 429/rate-limit from platform → double cooldown for that platform. Reset to default after successful action.
```text
# Rate limit check before action
def can_act(platform, thread_id):
if rate_limit_exceeded(platform):
return False, "rate limited"
if thread_in_cooldown(thread_id):
return False, "thread cooldown active"
return True, "clear"
# After action
def record_action(platform, thread_id):
increment_rate_counter(platform)
set_cooldown(thread_id, cooldown_minutes)
# After rate-limit error
def handle_rate_error(platform):
current_cooldown = get_platform_cooldown(platform)
set_platform_cooldown(platform, current_cooldown * 2)
```
→ Agent never exceeds rate limits. Threads have cooldowns. Rate-limit errs → auto backoff. Buffer accumulates during cooldown w/o losing items.
**If err:** Rate limits hit despite enforcement (clock skew, concurrent agents) → increase safety margin → limits to 80% of actual. Cooldowns too aggressive (missing time-sensitive threads) → reduce `cooldown_minutes` for high-priority only.
### Step 6: Gen Digest
Produce compact summary for du-dum's action beat. Digest = handoff point: du-dum reads this, not raw buffer.
Digest contents:
1. **Total pending**: count of `state=new`
2. **Top-N**: highest-priority (default N=5 from `digest_size`)
3. **Expiring soon**: items w/in 20% of TTL
4. **Threads in cooldown**: active cooldowns + time remaining
5. **Buffer health**: total items, merged count, expired count
```markdown
# Engagement Digest — 2026-04-08T12:00:00Z
## Pending: 12 items
### Top 5 by Priority
| # | Priority | Source | Summary | Age |
|---|----------|--------|---------|-----|
| 1 | 5.0 | github:pr-218 | Review requested by contributor | 2h |
| 2 | 4.2 | github:issue-99 | Maintainer question (escalated) | 6h |
| 3 | 3.0 | slack:dev | Build failure alert | 1h |
| 4 | 2.8 | github:pr-215 | CI check feedback (3 participants) | 3h |
| 5 | 2.1 | email:inbox | Collaboration inquiry | 8h |
### Expiring Soon
- github:issue-85 — 4h remaining (TTL 48h, ingested 44h ago)
### Cooldowns Active
- pr-210: 22 min remaining
- issue-92: 45 min remaining
### Buffer Health
- Total items: 47 | New: 12 | Merged: 18 | Acted: 11 | Expired: 6
```
Write digest to known path (e.g., `buffer_path.digest.md`) that du-dum's action clock reads.
→ Digest < 50 lines du-dum can parse in one read. Enough info to decide what to act on, not full buffer. Nothing pending → digest says so clearly.
**If err:** Digest > 50 lines → reduce `digest_size` / summarize expiring+cooldown sections aggressively. Digest = summary — approaches buffer size → lost purpose.
### Step 7: Track State Transitions
After du-dum processes items from digest → update states + maintain audit.
State machine:
```text
new → acknowledged → acted → cooldown → expired
↑ │
└───── (re-ingested) ───┘
merged → (terminal, no further transitions)
expired → (terminal, archived)
```
Per transition:
1. Update `state` in buffer file
2. Append transition log: `{"item_id": "...", "from": "new", "to": "acknowledged", "timestamp": "...", "reason": "du-dum digest pickup"}`
3. After acting → set thread cooldown (feeds back to Step 5)
**Retention + pruning:**
- Archive `state=acted` / `state=expired` older than 7 days (configurable)
- Archive by moving to separate file (`buffer_path.archive.jsonl`), not delete
- Prune `state=merged` older than 24h (served dedup purpose)
- Run pruning at end of cycle, after state updates
```text
# End-of-cycle maintenance
for item in buffer:
if item.state == "new" and age_hours(item) > item.ttl_hours:
transition(item, "expired", reason="TTL exceeded")
if item.state in ("acted", "expired") and age_days(item) > retention_days:
archive(item)
if item.state == "merged" and age_hours(item) > 24:
archive(item)
rewrite_buffer(buffer_path, active_items_only)
```
→ Every transition logged w/ timestamp + reason. Buffer file has only active items (new, acknowledged, cooldown). Archived preserved separately for audit. Buffer doesn't grow unbounded.
**If err:** Buffer corrupted during rewrite (partial write, crash) → restore from pre-rewrite backup. Always write temp + atomic rename — never rewrite in place. Archive too large → compress / rotate monthly.
## Check
- [ ] Schema incl all req fields (id, source, timestamp, content_summary, priority, state, dedup_key, thread_id, ttl_hours)
- [ ] Ingestion assigns correct initial priorities by type
- [ ] Dedup merges items sharing dedup_key w/in window
- [ ] Thread bursts detected + consolidated w/ participant counts
- [ ] Composite scoring applies recency decay + escalation, capped at 5
- [ ] Per-platform rate limits enforced before write action
- [ ] Per-thread cooldowns prevent re-engagement w/in window
- [ ] Digest compact (<50 lines), top-N, clear empty state
- [ ] State transitions logged w/ timestamps for audit
- [ ] Expired + acted items archived, not deleted
- [ ] Buffer doesn't grow unbounded over cycles
## Traps
- **No TTL**: Buffer grows unbounded; stale crowds out fresh. Every item needs TTL + pruning runs every cycle.
- **Ignore thread cooldowns**: Rapid-fire replies in same thread feel spammy. Cooldowns = social norm, not just rate-limit technicality.
- **Priority w/o decay**: Old high-priority block newer indefinitely. Decay ensures buffer reflects current relevance, not historical importance.
- **Dedup window too narrow**: 1h misses dups arriving hours apart (notification + reminder). Start 24h, narrow only if legit items merged incorrectly.
- **Couple buffer to single platform**: Design adapter pattern from start. Each platform adapter produces std buffer items; buffer itself platform-agnostic.
- **Skip digest step**: Du-dum needs summary, not raw buffer. Passing full buffer defeats two-clock architecture — action clock reads compact digest + decides quickly.
## →
- `du-dum` — cadence pattern this buffer composes w/; du-dum decides when, this skill decides what
- `manage-token-budget` — cost accounting; buffer respects token budget when sizing digests + limiting action throughput
- `circuit-breaker-pattern` — failure handling for platform adapters feeding buffer; circuit opens → ingestion degrades gracefully
- `coordinate-reasoning` — stigmergic signals between buffer + action systems; buffer file itself = stigmergic artifact
- `forage-resources` — discovery of new engagement sources → feed buffer's ingestion adapters
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!