Evolve an existing skill by refining its content in-place or creating an advanced variant. Covers assessing the current skill, gathering evolution requirements, choosing scope (refinement vs. variant), applying changes, updating version metadata, and synchronizing the registry and cross-references. Use when a skill's procedure steps are outdated, user feedback reveals gaps, a skill needs a complexity upgrade, an advanced variant is needed alongside the original, or related skills are added an...
Scanned 9/3/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add pjt222/agent-almanac --skill evolve-skill --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Evolve Skill?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/pjt222-evolve-skill-147b6d04)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: evolve-skill
description: >
Evolve an existing skill by refining its content in-place or creating an
advanced variant. Covers assessing the current skill, gathering evolution
requirements, choosing scope (refinement vs. variant), applying changes,
updating version metadata, and synchronizing the registry and cross-references.
Use when a skill's procedure steps are outdated, user feedback reveals gaps,
a skill needs a complexity upgrade, an advanced variant is needed alongside
the original, or related skills are added and cross-references are stale.
license: MIT
allowed-tools: Read Write Edit Bash Grep Glob
metadata:
author: Philipp Thoss
version: "1.5"
domain: general
complexity: intermediate
language: multi
tags: meta, skill, agentskills, maintenance, evolution, versioning
---
# Evolve an Existing Skill
Improve, extend, or create an advanced variant of a skill that was originally authored with `create-skill`. This procedure covers the maintenance side of the skill lifecycle: assessing gaps, applying targeted improvements, bumping versions, and keeping the registry and cross-references in sync.
## When to Use
- A skill's procedure steps are outdated or incomplete after tooling changes
- User feedback reveals missing pitfalls, unclear steps, or weak validation
- A skill needs to grow from basic to intermediate (or intermediate to advanced)
- An advanced variant is needed alongside the original (e.g., `create-r-package` and `create-r-package-advanced`)
- Related skills were added or removed and cross-references are stale
## Inputs
- **Required**: Path to the existing SKILL.md to evolve
- **Required**: Evolution trigger (feedback, tooling change, complexity upgrade, new related skills, discovered pitfalls)
- **Optional**: Target complexity level if changing (basic, intermediate, advanced)
- **Optional**: Whether to create an advanced variant instead of refining in-place (default: refine in-place)
## Procedure
### Step 1: Assess the Current Skill
Read the existing SKILL.md and evaluate each section against the quality checklist:
| Section | What to Check | Common Issues |
|---|---|---|
| Frontmatter | All required fields present, `description` < 1024 chars | Missing `tags`, stale `version` |
| When to Use | 3-5 concrete trigger conditions | Vague or overlapping triggers |
| Inputs | Required vs optional clearly separated | Missing defaults for optional inputs |
| Procedure | Each step has code + Expected + On failure | Missing On failure blocks, pseudocode instead of real commands |
| Validation | Each item is binary pass/fail | Subjective criteria ("code is clean") |
| Common Pitfalls | 3-6 with cause and avoidance | Too generic ("be careful") |
| Related Skills | 2-5 valid skill references | Stale references to renamed/removed skills |
```bash
# Read the skill
cat skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md
# Check frontmatter parses
head -20 skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md
# Verify related skills still exist
grep -oP '`[\w-]+`' skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md | sort -u
```
**Expected:** A list of specific gaps, weaknesses, or improvement opportunities.
**On failure:** If the SKILL.md doesn't exist or has no frontmatter, this skill doesn't apply — use `create-skill` instead to author it from scratch.
### Step 2: Gather Evolution Requirements
Identify and categorize what triggered the evolution:
| Trigger | Example | Typical Scope |
|---|---|---|
| User feedback | "Step 3 is unclear" | Refinement |
| Tooling change | New API version, deprecated command | Refinement |
| Discovered pitfall | Common failure not documented | Refinement |
| Complexity upgrade | Skill is too shallow for real use | Refinement or variant |
| New related skills | Adjacent skill was added | Refinement (cross-refs) |
| Advanced use case | Power users need deeper coverage | Variant |
Document the specific changes needed before editing. List each change with its target section.
**Expected:** A concrete list of changes (e.g., "Add On failure to Step 4", "Add new Step 6 for edge case X", "Update Related Skills to include `new-skill`").
**On failure:** If the changes are unclear, consult the user for clarification before proceeding. Vague evolution goals produce vague improvements.
### Step 3: Choose Evolution Scope
Use this decision matrix to determine whether to refine in-place or create a variant:
| Criteria | Refinement (in-place) | Advanced Variant (new skill) |
|---|---|---|
| Skill ID | Unchanged | New ID: `<skill>-advanced` |
| File path | Same SKILL.md | New directory |
| Version bump | Minor (major only if breaking) | Starts at 1.0 |
| Complexity | May increase | Higher than original |
| Registry | No new entry | New entry added |
| Symlinks | No change | New symlinks needed |
| Original skill | Modified directly | Left intact, gains cross-reference |
**Refinement**: Choose when improving quality, fixing gaps, or adding modest new content. The skill keeps its identity.
**Variant**: Choose when the evolved version would double the length, change the target audience, or require substantially different inputs. The original stays as-is for simpler use cases.
**Expected:** A clear decision — refinement or variant — with rationale.
**On failure:** If unsure, default to refinement. You can always extract a variant later; it's harder to merge one back.
### Step 4: Apply Content Changes
#### For Refinements
Edit the existing SKILL.md directly:
- Open for editing
- Add/revise procedure steps
- Strengthen Expected/On failure pairs
- Add tables or examples
- Update When to Use triggers
- Revise Inputs if scope changed
Follow these editing rules:
- Preserve all existing sections — add content, don't remove sections
- Keep step numbering sequential after insertions
- Every new or modified step must have both Expected and On failure
- New pitfalls go at the end of the Common Pitfalls section — but if appending would push the count above 6, do not append: evict the pitfall with the lowest rediscovery cost instead, the one a competent agent would most likely avoid unaided. An eviction must name the Procedure step or section that already teaches the evicted content — if none does, first fold the pitfall's counterintuitive fact into the step that should carry it, then evict. Pitfalls are ranked by what they save, not by age. Skills already over the cap are grandfathered: evict when a later evolution adds a pitfall, not as a bulk retro-edit
- New related skills go at the end of the Related Skills section
#### For Variants
```bash
# Create the variant directory
mkdir -p skills/<skill-name>-advanced/
# Copy the original as a starting point
cp skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md skills/<skill-name>-advanced/SKILL.md
# Edit the variant:
# - Change `name` to `<skill-name>-advanced`
# - Update `description` to reflect the advanced scope
# - Raise `complexity` (e.g., intermediate → advanced)
# - Reset `version` to "1.0"
# - Add/expand procedure steps for the advanced use case
# - Reference the original in Related Skills as a prerequisite
```
**Expected:** The SKILL.md (refined or new variant) passes the assessment checklist from Step 1.
**On failure:** If a step edit breaks the document structure, use `git diff` to review changes and revert partial edits with `git checkout -- <file>`.
### Step 4.5: Sync Translated Variants
> **Required when translations exist.** This step applies to both human authors and AI agents following this procedure. Do not skip — stale `source_commit` values cause `npm run validate:translations` to report false staleness warnings across all locales.
Check whether translations exist for the evolved skill and update them to reflect the new source state:
```bash
# Check for existing translations
ls i18n/*/skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md 2>/dev/null
```
#### If translations exist
1. Get the current source commit hash:
```bash
SOURCE_COMMIT=$(git rev-parse HEAD)
```
2. Update `source_commit` in each translated file's frontmatter:
```bash
for locale_file in i18n/*/skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md; do
sed -i "s/^source_commit: .*/source_commit: $SOURCE_COMMIT/" "$locale_file"
done
```
3. Flag files for re-translation by including affected locales in the commit message:
```text
evolve(<skill-name>): <description of changes>
Translations flagged for re-sync: de, zh-CN, ja, es
Changed sections: <list sections that changed>
```
4. Regenerate translation status files:
```bash
npm run translation:status
```
#### If no translations exist
No action needed. Proceed to Step 5.
#### For variants
Defer translation of new variants until the variant stabilizes (1-2 versions). Translating a v1.0 variant that may change substantially by v1.2 wastes effort. Add translations after the variant has been refined at least once.
**Expected:** All translated files have `source_commit` updated to the current commit. The commit message notes which locales need re-translation and which sections changed. `npm run translation:status` exits 0.
**On failure:** If `sed` fails to match the frontmatter field, the translated file may have non-standard formatting. Open it manually and verify it has `source_commit` in its YAML frontmatter. If the field is missing, the file was not scaffolded correctly — re-scaffold with `npm run translate:scaffold`.
### Step 5: Update Version and Metadata
Skill versions are two-part, `MAJOR.MINOR` — there is no patch component, so every
change lands in one of exactly two buckets:
| Change Type | Version Bump | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Typo fix, wording clarification | Minor: 1.0 → 1.1 | Fixed unclear sentence in Step 3 |
| Additive: new step, new pitfall, new table | Minor: 1.0 → 1.1 | Added Step 7 for edge case handling |
| Breaking: restructured procedure, changed inputs | Major: 1.0 → 2.0 | Reorganized from 5 to 8 steps |
**The criterion is whether existing callers break, not how much text changed.** Bump
MINOR when a caller who followed the previous version still gets a correct result —
clarifications and additions are minor no matter how many lines they touch. Bump MAJOR
(and reset MINOR to 0) only when the change invalidates how the skill was being used:
steps renumbered or removed, required Inputs added or renamed, or an Expected outcome
redefined so that following the old version now produces the wrong result.
Existing corpus versions are grandfathered — do not retro-bump a skill to correct a
historical mislabel.
Also update:
- `complexity` if the scope expanded (e.g., basic → intermediate)
- `tags` if the coverage area changed
- `description` if the skill's scope is materially different
**Expected:** Frontmatter `version` reflects the magnitude of changes. New variants start at `"1.0"`.
**On failure:** If you forget to bump the version, the next evolution will have no way to distinguish the current state from the previous one. Always bump before committing.
### Step 6: Update Registry and Cross-References
#### For Refinements
No registry changes are needed (path unchanged). Update cross-references only if Related Skills changed in other skills:
```bash
# Check if any skill references the evolved skill
grep -r "<skill-name>" skills/*/SKILL.md
```
#### For Variants
Add the new skill to `skills/_registry.yml`:
```yaml
- id: <skill-name>-advanced
path: <skill-name>-advanced/SKILL.md
complexity: advanced
language: multi
description: One-line description of the advanced variant
```
Then:
1. Increment `total_skills` at the top of the registry
2. Add Related Skills cross-reference in the original skill pointing to the variant
3. Add Related Skills cross-reference in the variant pointing to the original
4. Create symlinks for slash command discovery:
```bash
# Project-level
ln -s ../../skills/<skill-name>-advanced .claude/skills/<skill-name>-advanced
# Global
ln -s /mnt/d/dev/p/agent-almanac/skills/<skill-name>-advanced ~/.claude/skills/<skill-name>-advanced
```
**Expected:** Registry `total_skills` matches `find skills -name SKILL.md | wc -l`. Cross-references are bidirectional.
**On failure:** If the registry count is wrong, run `find skills -name SKILL.md | wc -l` to get the true count and correct the registry. For broken symlinks, use `readlink -f` to debug resolution.
### Step 7: Validate the Evolved Skill
Run the full validation checklist:
- [ ] SKILL.md exists at the expected path
- [ ] YAML frontmatter parses without errors
- [ ] `version` was bumped (refinement) or set to "1.0" (variant)
- [ ] All sections present: When to Use, Inputs, Procedure, Validation, Common Pitfalls, Related Skills
- [ ] Every procedure step has Expected and On failure blocks
- [ ] Related Skills reference valid, existing skill names
- [ ] Registry entry exists with correct path (variants only)
- [ ] `total_skills` count matches actual skill count on disk
- [ ] Symlinks resolve correctly (variants only)
- [ ] `git diff` shows no accidental deletions from the original content
- [ ] For refinements with translations: `source_commit` updated or translations flagged for re-sync
```bash
# Verify frontmatter
head -20 skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md
# Count skills on disk vs registry
find skills -name SKILL.md | wc -l
grep total_skills skills/_registry.yml
# Check symlinks (for variants)
ls -la .claude/skills/<skill-name>-advanced
readlink -f .claude/skills/<skill-name>-advanced/SKILL.md
# Review all changes
git diff
```
**Expected:** All checklist items pass. The evolved skill is ready to commit.
**On failure:** Address each failing item individually. The most common post-evolution issue is a stale `total_skills` count — always verify it last.
## Validation
- [ ] SKILL.md exists and has valid YAML frontmatter
- [ ] `version` field reflects the changes made
- [ ] All procedure steps have Expected and On failure blocks
- [ ] Related Skills references are valid (no broken cross-references)
- [ ] Registry `total_skills` matches actual count on disk
- [ ] For variants: new entry in `_registry.yml` with correct path
- [ ] For variants: symlinks created at `.claude/skills/` and `~/.claude/skills/`
- [ ] `git diff` confirms no accidental content removal
- [ ] For refinements with translations: `source_commit` updated or translations flagged for re-sync
## Common Pitfalls
- **Forgetting to bump version**: Without version bumps, there's no way to track what changed or when. Always update `version` in frontmatter before committing.
- **Accidental content deletion**: When restructuring steps, it's easy to drop an On failure block or a table row. Always review `git diff` before committing.
- **Stale cross-references**: When creating a variant, both the original and the variant need to reference each other. One-directional references leave the graph incomplete.
- **Registry count drift**: After creating a variant, the `total_skills` count must be incremented. Forgetting this causes validation failures in other skills that check the registry.
- **Stale translations after evolution**: The repo mirrors content across 10 locale trees (`i18n/<locale>/skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md`), so a single skill evolution can stale up to 10 locale copies. Always check for existing translations with `ls i18n/*/skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md` and either update `source_commit` in each translated file's frontmatter *after re-translating*, or flag them for re-translation in the commit message. Bumping `source_commit` without re-translating marks stale content as fresh and suppresses the freshness check — never do that. Skipping the check entirely causes `npm run validate:translations` to report stale warnings.
- **Scope creep during refinement**: A refinement that doubles the skill's length should probably be a variant instead. If you're adding more than 3 new procedure steps, reconsider the scope decision from Step 3.
- **Avoid `git mv` on NTFS-mounted paths (WSL)**: On `/mnt/` paths, `git mv` for directories can create broken permissions (`d?????????`). Use `mkdir -p` + copy files + `git rm` the old path instead. See the [environment guide](../../guides/setting-up-your-environment.md) troubleshooting section.
## Related Skills
- `create-skill` — foundation for authoring new skills; evolve-skill assumes this was followed originally
- `commit-changes` — commit the evolved skill with a descriptive message
- `configure-git-repository` — version-controlled skill changes
- `security-audit-codebase` — review evolved skills for accidentally included secrets
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!