Design practical electromagnetic devices including electromagnets, DC and brushless motors, generators, and transformers by bridging theory to application. Use when sizing a solenoid or toroidal electromagnet for a target field or force, selecting motor topology and computing torque and efficiency, designing a transformer for a given voltage ratio and power rating, or analyzing losses from copper resistance, core hysteresis, and eddy currents.
Scanned 9/3/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add pjt222/agent-almanac --skill design-electromagnetic-device --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Design Electromagnetic Device?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/pjt222-design-electromagnetic-device-6650892d)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: design-electromagnetic-device
locale: caveman-ultra
source_locale: en
source_commit: 82c77053
fence_basis_commit: 82c77053
translator: "Julius Brussee homage — caveman"
translation_date: "2026-04-19"
description: >
Design practical electromagnetic devices including electromagnets, DC and
brushless motors, generators, and transformers by bridging theory to
application. Use when sizing a solenoid or toroidal electromagnet for a
target field or force, selecting motor topology and computing torque and
efficiency, designing a transformer for a given voltage ratio and power
rating, or analyzing losses from copper resistance, core hysteresis, and
eddy currents.
license: MIT
allowed-tools: Read Grep Glob WebFetch WebSearch
metadata:
author: Philipp Thoss
version: "1.0"
domain: electromagnetism
complexity: intermediate
language: natural
tags: electromagnetism, device-design, motors, generators, transformers, electromagnets
---
# Design Electromagnetic Device
Spec perf → topology → compute from EM first principles → analyze losses + efficiency → validate vs thermal + saturation.
## Use When
- Size electromagnet (solenoid/toroidal) for B-field, pull, hold force
- Select motor topology (DC brushed, BLDC, stepper, induction), compute torque + speed + eff
- Design generator → V, I, freq
- Design transformer → V ratio, power, freq
- Analyze + min losses: copper (I^2 R), core (hyst + eddy), stray flux
## In
- **Required**: Device type (electromagnet, motor, generator, transformer)
- **Required**: Perf reqs (B, force, torque, V ratio, power, eff target)
- **Required**: Operating (V, I, freq, duty, ambient T)
- **Optional**: Core mat (silicon steel, ferrite, powdered iron, air) + B-H
- **Optional**: Size/weight
- **Optional**: Cost/mfg
## Do
### Step 1: Reqs + operating
Full targets before topology:
1. **Primary metric**:
- Electromagnet: B (T) at point, or pull force (N) on armature
- Motor: rated T (N.m) at RPM, or power (W) at RPM
- Generator: V, I, Hz at mech speed
- Transformer: V1, V2, VA, freq
2. **Secondary**: Eff (%), max T rise above ambient (K), duty (cont, intermittent, pulsed), envelope (max D, L, weight).
3. **Supply**: V, I, freq (DC/AC w/ Hz), waveform (sine, PWM, trapezoidal).
4. **Environment**: T range, cooling (nat convection, forced air, liquid), altitude, vibration/shock.
```markdown
## Design Requirements
- **Device type**: [electromagnet / motor / generator / transformer]
- **Primary specification**: [value with units]
- **Efficiency target**: [%]
- **Supply**: [voltage, current, frequency]
- **Thermal limit**: [max temperature rise in K]
- **Size constraint**: [dimensions or weight]
- **Duty cycle**: [continuous / intermittent (on-time/off-time) / pulsed]
```
→ Complete quantified reqs, no ambiguity. Every req has val + units.
If err: Conflict (high T in tiny vol + high eff) → identify tradeoff explicit. EM scaling: force ~ volume, losses ~ surface area, thermal constrains power density.
### Step 2: Topology
Config matches reqs:
1. **Electromagnet**:
- **Solenoid** (cylindrical): Simple wind, uniform B = mu_0 n I. Uniform-field apps. Air gap for pull.
- **Toroid**: No stray field. Min stray. Less uniform for partial.
- **C-core / E-core**: High force compact. Air gap concentrates. Relays + hold magnets.
- **Helmholtz pair**: 2 coils sep by 1 radius. Uniform center. Calibration + measurement.
2. **Motor**:
- **DC brushed**: Simple drive, good low-speed T. Brushes limit lifetime + speed. T = k_T * I.
- **BLDC**: Electronic commutation, higher speed + lifetime. Trapezoidal/sinusoidal. Modern dominant.
- **Stepper**: Precise open-loop (1.8 or 0.9 deg). Lower cont T than BLDC. Positioning w/o feedback.
- **AC induction**: Robust, no PM, simple. Speed = supply freq + slip. Industrial power.
3. **Generator**: Motors reversed. BLDC motor → BLDC gen (back-EMF = output). Induction above sync. PM gen for small (wind, hydro).
4. **Transformer**:
- **Core type**: Windings on single leg. Std power.
- **Shell type**: Core around windings. Better shielding. High-power.
- **Toroidal**: No gap, low stray, compact. Higher winding cost. Audio + sensitive electronics.
- **Planar / PCB**: PCB trace windings. Low profile. SMPS at high freq.
```markdown
## Topology Selection
- **Topology chosen**: [specific configuration]
- **Justification**: [why it matches the requirements]
- **Key advantages**: [for this application]
- **Key limitations**: [and mitigation strategy]
- **Alternatives considered**: [and why rejected]
```
→ Justified selection tied to Step 1 reqs w/ acknowledged limitations.
If err: No std topology meets all → hybrid (Halbach array) or relax secondary. Doc tradeoff.
### Step 3: Design params
Physical dims + elec params from EM principles:
1. **Electromagnet**:
- Turns: N = B * l_core / (mu_0 * mu_r * I), or mag circuit: N * I = Phi * R_total
- Wire gauge: J (3-6 A/mm^2 cont, 15 A/mm^2 intermittent). A_wire = I / J.
- Core X-sec: A_core = Phi / B_max (below sat: 1.5-1.8 T silicon steel, 0.3-0.5 T ferrite)
- Gap force: F = B^2 * A_gap / (2 * mu_0) (Maxwell stress)
- R winding: R = rho_Cu * N * l_mean_turn / A_wire
2. **Motor**:
- Torque const: k_T = (2 * B * l * r * N) / phases (simplified BLDC)
- Back-EMF: k_E = k_T (SI)
- I_rated = T_rated / k_T
- omega_no_load = V_supply / k_E
- R from wire gauge + mean turn
3. **Transformer**:
- Turns ratio: N_1 / N_2 = V_1 / V_2
- Core X-sec: A_core = V_1 / (4.44 * f * N_1 * B_max) (sinusoidal)
- N_1 = V_1 / (4.44 * f * B_max * A_core)
- Window area: A_window = (N_1 * A_wire1 + N_2 * A_wire2) / k_fill (k_fill 0.3-0.5)
- Core vol: V_core = A_core * l_mean_path
4. **Mag circuit** (cores + gaps):
- R_core = l_core / (mu_0 * mu_r * A_core)
- R_gap = l_gap / (mu_0 * A_gap) (much > R_core for small gaps)
- R_total = R_core + R_gap (series), 1/R_total = sum(1/R_i) (parallel)
- Phi = N * I / R_total
```markdown
## Design Parameters
- **Turns**: N = [value] (primary), N_2 = [value] (if applicable)
- **Wire gauge**: AWG [number] (diameter [mm], area [mm^2])
- **Core dimensions**: A_core = [mm^2], l_core = [mm], l_gap = [mm]
- **Core material**: [type], B_max = [T], mu_r = [value]
- **Winding resistance**: R = [Ohms]
- **Operating current**: I = [A], current density J = [A/mm^2]
- **Key performance**: [B-field / torque / voltage ratio = calculated value]
```
→ Numerical vals for all dims + elec params from EM equations w/ units at each step.
If err: Turns don't fit → bigger core (more window), finer wire (higher J, more heat), or reduce target. Core above B_max → bigger X-sec or more turns.
### Step 4: Losses + eff
Quantify all mechanisms + eff:
1. **Copper (I^2 R)**:
- P_Cu = I^2 * R_winding (DC)
- High freq: skin effect. R_AC / R_DC increases when diam > 2 * delta.
- Proximity effect in multi-layer → more AC R.
- Mitigate: Litz wire for >~10 kHz.
2. **Core (hyst + eddy)**:
- Hyst vol per cycle: W_h = area B-H loop
- P_h = k_h * f * B_max^n * V_core (Steinmetz, n 1.6-2.0, k_h from data)
- Eddy: P_e = k_e * f^2 * B_max^2 * t^2 * V_core (t = lamination thick)
- Combined (gen Steinmetz): P_core = k * f^alpha * B_max^beta * V_core
- Mitigate: laminated (0.25-0.5 mm for 50/60 Hz, thinner higher freq), ferrite for >100 kHz
3. **Eddy in conductors/structure**:
- Stray flux → currents in frame, shields, conductors
- Big in large transformers + machines
- Mitigate: non-mag struct mat, mag shields
4. **Mechanical** (motors, gens):
- Bearing friction: P_friction = T_friction * omega
- Windage (air): P_windage ~ omega^3
- Brush friction (DC brushed): wear-dependent
5. **Eff calc**:
- Electromagnet: not primary metric → focus P = I^2 R for field/force
- Motor: eta = P_mech / P_elec = (T * omega) / (V * I)
- Generator: eta = P_elec / P_mech
- Transformer: eta = P_out / P_in = P_out / (P_out + P_Cu + P_core)
- Typ: small motors 60-85%, large 90-97%, transformers 95-99%
```markdown
## Loss Analysis
| Loss Mechanism | Formula | Value (W) | Fraction of Total |
|---------------|---------|-----------|-------------------|
| Copper (I^2R) | [expression] | [W] | [%] |
| Core hysteresis | [expression] | [W] | [%] |
| Core eddy current | [expression] | [W] | [%] |
| Mechanical (if applicable) | [expression] | [W] | [%] |
| **Total losses** | | [W] | 100% |
- **Efficiency**: eta = [%]
- **Temperature rise estimate**: Delta_T = P_total / (h * A_surface) = [K]
```
→ Loss breakdown, each quantified, eff, T rise for thermal feas.
If err: Eff below target → ID dominant. Copper → bigger wire or fewer turns. Core → lower-loss mat or reduce B_max. Mech → better bearings. T rise exceeds → more cooling or reduce density.
### Step 5: Validate
Meets specs + physically realizable:
1. **Perf verify**:
- Recompute primary from final params
- Meets/exceeds Step 1
- Margin: (achieved - required) / required %
2. **Saturation**:
- B_max < sat flux density of mat
- Every section (legs, yoke, gap fringing)
- Gap region lowest flux density, smallest X-sec has highest
3. **Thermal**:
- T_surface = T_ambient + P_total / (h * A_surface)
- Nat convection: h ~ 5-10 W/(m^2.K)
- Forced air: h ~ 25-100 W/(m^2.K)
- Insulation class: A (105°C), B (130°C), F (155°C), H (180°C)
- Core Curie: silicon steel ~770°C (rarely limit), ferrite ~200-300°C (can be limit)
4. **Dims**:
- Fits envelope
- Winding fits window w/ fill factor
- Clearance + creepage for HV
5. **Margin + sensitivity**:
- +/-10% var each key param (I, turns, gap, mu_r)
- ID most sensitive → drives mfg tolerance
- Air-gap: gap length almost always most sensitive
```markdown
## Design Validation
| Requirement | Target | Achieved | Margin |
|------------|--------|----------|--------|
| [Primary metric] | [value] | [value] | [%] |
| Efficiency | [%] | [%] | [%] |
| Temperature rise | < [K] | [K] | [K margin] |
| Envelope | [dimensions] | [dimensions] | [fits / exceeds] |
## Sensitivity Analysis
| Parameter | Nominal | +10% Effect on Primary Metric | Most Sensitive? |
|-----------|---------|-------------------------------|----------------|
| Current | [A] | [+/- %] | [Yes/No] |
| Turns | [N] | [+/- %] | [Yes/No] |
| Air gap | [mm] | [+/- %] | [Yes/No] |
| mu_r | [value] | [+/- %] | [Yes/No] |
```
→ All reqs met w/ docs margins, thermal OK, most sensitive param ID'd.
If err: Req not met → iterate topology (Step 2), params (Step 3), or loss mitigation (Step 4). Thermal infeasible → reduce duty, more size (cooling), higher-T insulation, active cooling. Doc each iter.
## Check
- [ ] All reqs quantified w/ vals + units
- [ ] Topology justified + alts docs
- [ ] Mag circuit complete (reluctances, flux, NI)
- [ ] Wire gauge for J (3-6 A/mm^2 cont)
- [ ] Core below sat w/ margin
- [ ] All losses quantified (copper, hyst, eddy, mech)
- [ ] Eff meets target
- [ ] T rise w/in insulation class
- [ ] Fits envelope
- [ ] Sensitivity ID's tightest-tolerance param
- [ ] Complete for prototype build
## Traps
- **Ignoring mag circuit reluctance**: Gap dominates (1 mm gap > 100 mm silicon steel core reluctance). No mag circuit model → devices far below expectations.
- **Operating above sat**: Above B-H knee, incremental mu drops. Doubling I ≠ doubling flux. Appears to "stop working". Always check B_max in narrowest X-sec.
- **Undersize copper for thermal**: J limits = thermal in disguise. 10 A/mm^2 free air → overheats in min. Cont-duty < 5-6 A/mm^2 w/o active cooling.
- **Neglect fringing at gaps**: Flux spreads → effective gap area bigger. Gaps ~ core dim → fringing 20-50%. Ignoring → underestimate flux + overestimate NI.
- **DC R at high freq**: 10 kHz skin depth in Cu ~ 0.66 mm. Magnet wire > 1.3 mm diam → AC R >> DC R. Litz or parallel thin strands.
- **Confuse k_T vs k_E units**: k_T (N.m/A) + k_E (V.s/rad) numerically equal SI. BUT k_E in V/kRPM (datasheets) → convert: k_T [N.m/A] = k_E [V/kRPM] * 60 / (2 * pi * 1000).
## →
- `analyze-magnetic-field` — B-field from current dist for detailed analysis
- `solve-electromagnetic-induction` — induction principles in motors/gens/transformers
- `formulate-maxwell-equations` — full EM for high-freq, waveguides, antennas
- `simulate-cpu-architecture` — digital ctrl sys driving motor controllers + power electronics
- `analyze-tensegrity-system` — tension-compression networks; shares prestress equilibrium
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!