Assess whether a research result has real commercial potential before building a commercialisation strategy — distinguishing genuine market pull from technology push.
Scanned 9/6/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add Pilot2Service/AI-Business-Designer --skill research-opportunity-recognition --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Research Opportunity Recognition?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/pilot2service-research-opportunity-recognition)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: research-opportunity-recognition
description: "Assess whether a research result has real commercial potential before building a commercialisation strategy — distinguishing genuine market pull from technology push."
---
# Research Opportunity Recognition
## Purpose
Assess whether a research result has real commercial potential before
building a commercialisation strategy — distinguishing genuine market pull
from technology push.
## Based on
the owner's published commercialisation guide (owner, 2025). Chapter "Spotting
Real Opportunities" (pp. 18-20).
- Kirzner (1973/1979) — entrepreneurial alertness (see also the
opportunity-recognition core pack)
- VC investor evaluation criteria: market signal often outweighs the science
alone
## Method
1. State the problem in a single sentence: what problem does the invention
solve, and for whom?
2. Map the current alternatives / status quo — why do they fall short?
3. Do a value proposition mapping and competitor analysis: what is the genuine
edge (price, performance, new capability)?
4. Test early: customer interviews, surveys, a landing page, proof-of-market
funding.
5. Assess TRL and freedom to operate side by side — is the idea at a point
where a prototype is possible without unreasonable cost or regulatory
barriers?
6. Assess timing and the competitive landscape — look for the "sweet spot":
not too early, not into a crowded market without differentiation.
7. Treat the whole assessment as a testable hypothesis: strong signals
(enthusiastic industry partners, positive user feedback, clear market gaps)
→ move forward aggressively; weak signals → redirect or preserve resources.
## Gotchas
- Step 5 deliberately pairs TRL with freedom-to-operate — a high-TRL
prototype blocked by someone else's patent is not "ready," and this
skill doesn't perform that legal FTO analysis itself (see
`ip-disclosure-and-ownership-check` and TTO/IP counsel); treating step 5
as satisfied because TRL alone is high skips half the check.
- Step 7's "strong signals → move forward aggressively" is easy to
over-read from a thin sample — one enthusiastic industry contact (see
`industry-partner-engagement`) is not the interview/survey/landing-page
evidence step 4 asks for, and shouldn't single-handedly upgrade the
signal strength.
- Step 1 asks for the problem in one sentence, but researchers tend to
describe the technology's capability instead of the pain point — if the
sentence names a technique rather than a problem for a named "who," that
is the technology-push pattern this skill exists to catch.
- This skill explicitly does not make the go/no-go call — a "weak signal"
result should route to redirecting or preserving resources per step 7,
not get silently escalated into `spinout-vs-licensing-pathway` without
first re-testing.
- Step 6's "sweet spot" timing judgment is a point-in-time hypothesis (step
7), not a one-time verdict — an opportunity assessed as well-timed months
ago shouldn't be treated as still valid without re-scanning the
competitive landscape.
## What this skill does NOT do
- Does not make the final go/no-go decision for you.
- Does not assess patentability in a legal sense — see
`ip-disclosure-and-ownership-check` and your own TTO/IP counsel.
- Does not replace real customer conversations — it structures what to ask and
how to interpret the answers.
## Continue from here
- Next in this pack: `../spinout-vs-licensing-pathway/SKILL.md` — Choose the
right commercialisation pathway for a research result: spin-out
(equity-based), licensing (royalty-based), or hybrid.
- Related skill in another pack:
`../../../../opportunity-recognition/skills/opportunity-evaluation-and-judgment/SKILL.md`
- Related skill in another pack (the owner's productised follow-on assessment
of market attractiveness and feasibility):
`../../../../opportunity-recognition/skills/opportunity-value-assessment/SKILL.md`
- Pack's shared guardrails: `../../CLAUDE.md`
- Overview of the full journey: `../commercialisation-journey-roadmap/SKILL.md`
## References
- `../../references/case-studies.md` — 7 spin-out examples from different
industries and regions
- `../../references/terminology.md` — the handbook's glossary
- `../../references/sources.md` — the handbook's own source references
- `../../CLAUDE.md` — the pack's shared guardrails
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!