Skip to content
Back to skills

Ai Capability Roadmap

ASecurity

Builds the organization's AI capability map and roadmap from the current state to the target state across three horizons (0-6mo efficiency, 6-18mo transformation, 18-36mo new business), plus an AI Target Operating Model (ATOM) / Readiness Scorecard describing the division of labor between humans and AI.

  • 2 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added September 6, 2026
ai-agentsgorails

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 6, 2026

npx -y skills add Pilot2Service/AI-Business-Designer --skill ai-capability-roadmap --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Ai Capability Roadmap?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Ai Capability Roadmap
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/pilot2service-ai-capability-roadmap/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/pilot2service-ai-capability-roadmap)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: ai-capability-roadmap
description: "Builds the organization's AI capability map and roadmap from the current state to the target state across three horizons (0-6mo efficiency, 6-18mo transformation, 18-36mo new business), plus an AI Target Operating Model (ATOM) / Readiness Scorecard describing the division of labor between humans and AI."
---

# AI Capability Roadmap

## Purpose

Builds the organization's AI capability map and a scheduled roadmap from
the current state to the target state. Answers the question "WHEN does
each prioritized AI opportunity get implemented," complementing
`../ai-opportunity-portfolio/SKILL.md`, which answers "WHAT is worth doing
and WHAT TYPE of change is it."

## Anchored in research

- Market research — roadmaps and business capability maps
- Research digest "Methods, Frameworks, and Competencies for Identifying
  AI Opportunities and Capacity in Business" (2026) — the three-horizon
  Strategic AI Roadmap and the AI Target Operating Model (ATOM) /
  Readiness Scorecard concept, part of the deliverable material of
  large consulting firms' discovery engagements.

## Method

1. **Take the prioritized portfolio as input** from
   `../ai-opportunity-portfolio/SKILL.md`: the selected items with their
   scores, Value Play classification (if transformative), and
   Deploy/Reshape/Invent class.
2. **Place every item into one of three horizons:**
   - **Horizon 1 — Efficiency (0–6 months).** Fast, low-risk items.
     Typically corresponds to the "Quick Wins" category in the
     `ai-opportunity-portfolio` skill's 2x2 matrix and often the
     "Deploy" category in the Deploy-Reshape-Invent taxonomy (rolling
     out ready-made tools).
   - **Horizon 2 — Transformation (6–18 months).** Redesign of core
     processes. Often corresponds to the "Reshape" category — requires
     organizational change, not just tool adoption.
   - **Horizon 3 — New business (18–36 months).** Transformative
     items that create new revenue. Often corresponds to the "Invent"
     category and a "Strategic Bets" position in the 2x2 matrix.
   **Note:** the horizon and the Deploy/Reshape/Invent class CORRELATE
   but aren't the same thing — the same Reshape-level opportunity can
   land in Horizon 1 OR 2 depending on resources and dependencies.
   Don't automatically copy the class as the horizon; assess timing
   separately (dependencies, resources, the organization's capacity
   for change relative to other projects already underway).
3. **Build the AI Target Operating Model (ATOM) / Readiness
   Scorecard.** Describe for every horizon or key capability area:
   - **The human-AI division of labor** — which roles/tasks are
     Automate/Augment/Human-Only (see
     `../task-level-decomposition-and-automation-fit/SKILL.md`) AT
     this stage of the roadmap, and how the division of labor changes
     as the organization moves from one horizon to the next.
   - **The organization's readiness level** by capability area (e.g.
     data architecture, governance model, staff AI literacy, change-
     management capacity) — a rough scale (low/medium/high) is enough
     at this stage, a precise maturity model isn't needed.
   - **Critical missing capabilities** that need to be built BEFORE the
     next horizon's items can start (e.g. Horizon 2 often requires a
     data pipeline that Horizon 1 didn't yet need).
4. **Identify the dependencies between horizons explicitly.** Horizon
   2 and 3 items often rest on infrastructure or organizational
   learning built in Horizon 1 — mark these dependencies on the
   roadmap, don't treat the horizons as independent of each other.
5. Produce a structured output: a horizoned roadmap (item → horizon →
   dependencies → ATOM division-of-labor description) (see
   `../../references/` once added).
6. Validate the result with stakeholders or your own experience-based
   checklist. Make sure in particular that Horizon 1 implementations
   don't require more resources than the organization can supply
   alongside Horizon 2 planning.

## What this skill does NOT do

- Doesn't make the final decision for you — it produces a structured
  draft to support a human decision.
- Doesn't confirm figures, market data, or competitor data from
  memory — it uses the inputs you provide, or marks an assumption
  clearly (`[assumption — verify]`).
- Doesn't commit budget or resources — it produces a roadmap draft for
  approval.
- Doesn't do the prioritization itself — it uses the already-
  prioritized list produced by `../ai-opportunity-portfolio/SKILL.md`
  as input, it doesn't re-assess the value of opportunities.
- Doesn't build a full organizational AI maturity model — the ATOM/
  Readiness Scorecard here is a rough, roadmap-supporting description,
  not a separate maturity audit.

## Refinement notes

Areas to keep deepening with real practice:

- your own rules of thumb and heuristics for this technique — e.g.
  how many Horizon 1 items an organization can typically run in
  parallel
- concrete templates (into `../../references/`, e.g. an ATOM/Readiness
  Scorecard template)
- reference cases / your own examples
- what this skill deliberately does *not* do (guardrails, common
  mistakes) — add to the list above

Once this section is filled in and validated in practice, update the
`maturity` field in `skills_index.json` to `draft`, `validated`, or
`canonical` (see `../../../meta/maturity_levels.md`). **Don't add new
fields to the frontmatter** — `name` and `description` are the only
ones allowed (see `../../../meta/frontmatter_schema.md`).

## Continue from here

- Preceding skill in this pack: `../ai-opportunity-portfolio/SKILL.md`
  — produces the prioritized list that this skill schedules.
- Once this step is done, move to `../../../change-and-communication/skills/stakeholder-communication-plan/SKILL.md`
- Related skill in this pack: `../ai-discovery-engagement-design/SKILL.md`
  — if the roadmap is produced as part of a larger discovery
  engagement, this skill corresponds to the engagement's Phase 4.
- A ready-made skill chain for this situation: see `../../../playbooks/`
- This pack's shared guardrails: `../../CLAUDE.md`

## References

- `../../references/` — the pack's shared background material
- `../../CLAUDE.md` — the pack's shared guardrails

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.