Uses a ready-made, research-based library of 13 AI capability patterns (see ../../references/ai-capability-pattern-library.md) to pose diagnostic questions to a new client/industry, to assemble a raw list of AI opportunity candidates — an alternative or complement to task-level decomposition.
Scanned 9/6/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add Pilot2Service/AI-Business-Designer --skill ai-capability-pattern-matching --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Ai Capability Pattern Matching?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/pilot2service-ai-capability-pattern-matching)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: ai-capability-pattern-matching
description: "Uses a ready-made, research-based library of 13 AI capability patterns (see ../../references/ai-capability-pattern-library.md) to pose diagnostic questions to a new client/industry, to assemble a raw list of AI opportunity candidates — an alternative or complement to task-level decomposition."
---
# AI Capability Pattern Matching
## Purpose
Produces a raw list of AI opportunity candidates **top-down,
hypothesis-driven**, using a ready-made capability pattern library — as a
counterweight to the **bottom-up, data-driven** approach of
`../task-level-decomposition-and-automation-fit/SKILL.md` (process/task
mining one task at a time). The two are complementary:
- **Bottom-up** (task-level-decomposition): works through an existing
process/role one task at a time and classifies each one. Strong when
the process is already precisely described, but won't surface
opportunities that would only emerge from *redesigning* the process.
- **Top-down** (this skill): poses the client the diagnostic questions
of 13 patterns before the process has been precisely described.
Faster first-pass mapping, surfaces opportunities the client wouldn't
have named themselves ("we hadn't thought about it that way"), but
requires validation (point 4) before a candidate goes to scoring.
Use this skill especially at the **start** of a discovery workshop/
interview, before detailed process description has been done — and use
`../task-level-decomposition-and-automation-fit/SKILL.md` afterward, once
a specific process has been selected for closer examination.
## Anchored in research
- `../../references/ai-capability-pattern-library.md` — 13 patterns,
abstracted from 81 verified use cases in a broad industry report
(2026) and cross-checked against a second, independent AI use-case
digest (63 cases, 16 functions).
- `../../../opportunity-recognition/skills/pattern-and-analogy-connector/SKILL.md`
— the general Capability Pattern Mapping abstraction method, of
which the pattern library is the concrete AI application.
## Method
1. **Before the meeting: select the 4–6 most relevant patterns** from
the pattern library based on the client's industry/situation (not
all 13 at once — too many questions at once drowns the
conversation). Use the source material's industry-specific function
weighting as a rough guide (e.g. manufacturing → patterns 4, 5, 6,
11; professional services → patterns 2, 3, 9).
2. **Pose each selected pattern's diagnostic question to the client as
written**, don't turn it into something more technical or AI-jargon
heavy. The questions are deliberately phrased in business language,
not technology language (e.g. "where does a highly paid expert have
to search for anomalies..." not "could an LLM read documents...").
3. **Log every "yes, we have a situation like that" answer as a
structured candidate:** pattern name, the client's own description
of the situation, who does the work today, estimated volume/
frequency (if known). Don't score it yet at this stage — that
happens in point 5.
4. **Validate every candidate before further processing, with three
checks:**
- Is the situation genuinely recurring/high enough volume to be an
opportunity, or a one-off exception case?
- Does the pattern's assumed AI type (Agentic/Physical/other) match
the organization's current maturity level, or is there a gap risk
(e.g. a Physical AI pattern in an organization with no sensor
data at all)?
- Is there an obvious reason why this would NOT work in this
particular context (regulation, union agreement, safety
criticality)? If so, flag it visibly, don't hide it.
5. **Move validated candidates into `../ai-opportunity-portfolio/SKILL.md`**
for 5D scoring and 2x2 prioritization — this skill only produces
the raw list, it doesn't prioritize.
6. **If the client doesn't recognize any pattern as their own**, that's
information in itself: either the organization is already highly
automated in these areas, or the conversation hasn't reached the
right level in the organization (try a different role/team) — don't
force a fit.
## What this skill does NOT do
- Doesn't replace `../task-level-decomposition-and-automation-fit/SKILL.md`
— it produces a fast, hypothesis-driven raw list, not a precise
task-level classification. It's worth using both in the same
engagement, at different stages.
- Doesn't score or prioritize candidates — that's
`../ai-opportunity-portfolio/SKILL.md`'s job.
- Doesn't claim that all 13 patterns fit every client — some patterns
are clearly more industry-specific (e.g. the Physical AI patterns)
than others.
- Doesn't expand the pattern library's examples with details that
aren't in `../../references/ai-capability-pattern-library.md` — if
you need a deeper example, refer to the original sources rather than
filling in from memory.
- Isn't an exhaustive listing of every possible AI opportunity — the
13 patterns are a curated sample, not a comprehensive taxonomy. New
patterns will be found over time; add them to the library using the
same method (see the final section of
`../../references/ai-capability-pattern-library.md`).
## Refinement notes
The pattern library is built on a research basis (from two independent
industry AI use-case reports). Areas to keep deepening with real practice:
- your own observations on which patterns resonate most often with
which types of clients
- new patterns you've identified yourself but that aren't in the
sources — add them to
`../../references/ai-capability-pattern-library.md` in the same
format
- a concrete workshop template/question sheet (into `../../references/`)
Once this section is filled in and validated in practice, update the
`maturity` field in `skills_index.json` to `draft`, `validated`, or
`canonical` (see `../../../meta/maturity_levels.md`). **Don't add new
fields to the frontmatter** — `name` and `description` are the only
ones allowed (see `../../../meta/frontmatter_schema.md`).
## Continue from here
- Before this (the general method): `../../../opportunity-recognition/skills/pattern-and-analogy-connector/SKILL.md`
- A parallel, bottom-up approach: `../task-level-decomposition-and-automation-fit/SKILL.md`
- Next in this pack: `../ai-opportunity-portfolio/SKILL.md` —
scores and prioritizes the validated candidates this skill produces.
- If the whole process is run as a paid engagement:
`../ai-discovery-engagement-design/SKILL.md`
- A ready-made skill chain for this situation: see `../../../playbooks/`
- This pack's shared guardrails: `../../CLAUDE.md`
## References
- `../../references/ai-capability-pattern-library.md` — the library of
13 patterns with examples
- `../../references/` — the pack's shared background material
- `../../CLAUDE.md` — the pack's shared guardrails
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!