Skip to content
Back to skills

Validate

ASecurity

Run all validators against recent code changes

  • 24 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added October 21, 2026
ai-agentstypescriptpythongobashgitsecurity

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 3 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned October 21, 2026

npx -y skills add peteski22/agent-pragma --skill validate --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Validate?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Validate
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/peteski22-validate/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/peteski22-validate)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: validate
description: Run all validators against recent code changes
allowed-tools: Task, Bash
---

# Validation Orchestrator

Run all applicable validators against recent code changes.

## Step 1: Determine which validators to run

Check what files have changed. Combine committed, staged, and unstaged changes to capture all recent work:
```bash
{ git diff HEAD~1 HEAD --name-only --diff-filter=ACMRT 2>/dev/null; git diff --cached --name-only --diff-filter=ACMRT 2>/dev/null; git diff --name-only --diff-filter=ACMRT 2>/dev/null; } | sort -u
```

Based on file extensions, select validators:
- `.go` files → run `go-effective`, `go-proverbs`
- `.py` files → run `python-style`
- `.ts` or `.tsx` files → run `typescript-style`
- All files → run `security`
- All files → run `state-machine`
- All files → run `error-handling`

## Step 2: Run validators in parallel

Use the Task tool to spawn validators in parallel. For each applicable validator, create a Task with:
- subagent_type: "general-purpose"
- prompt: Use the Skill tool to invoke the validator. The prompt must explicitly require skill invocation and verbatim JSON output.

**Example Task prompt for each validator:**
```text
Invoke the `go-effective` skill using the Skill tool (skill: "go-effective"). Return its JSON output verbatim — do not summarize, reformat, or re-implement the validation logic.
```

**Go files changed:**
1. Task: Invoke `go-effective` skill and return JSON output verbatim.
2. Task: Invoke `go-proverbs` skill and return JSON output verbatim.
3. Task: Invoke `security` skill and return JSON output verbatim.
4. Task: Invoke `state-machine` skill and return JSON output verbatim.
5. Task: Invoke `error-handling` skill and return JSON output verbatim.

**Python files changed:**
1. Task: Invoke `python-style` skill and return JSON output verbatim.
2. Task: Invoke `security` skill and return JSON output verbatim.
3. Task: Invoke `state-machine` skill and return JSON output verbatim.
4. Task: Invoke `error-handling` skill and return JSON output verbatim.

**TypeScript files changed:**
1. Task: Invoke `typescript-style` skill and return JSON output verbatim.
2. Task: Invoke `security` skill and return JSON output verbatim.
3. Task: Invoke `state-machine` skill and return JSON output verbatim.
4. Task: Invoke `error-handling` skill and return JSON output verbatim.

**Mixed languages:** Combine all applicable validators. Security, state-machine, and error-handling always run exactly once regardless of how many languages are detected.

Run all applicable Tasks in parallel (multiple Task calls in one response).

## Step 3: Aggregate and present results

Collect all validator outputs and present a human-readable summary. Do NOT display raw validator JSON to the user — interpret and summarise the results.

```markdown
# Validation Results

| Validator | Result | HARD | SHOULD | WARN |
|-----------|--------|------|--------|------|
| {validator} | {✓ pass / ✗ fail} | {count} | {count} | {count} |

## HARD violations (must fix)
- **{validator}** `{file}:{line}` — {rule description}

## SHOULD violations (fix or justify)
- **{validator}** `{file}:{line}` — {rule description}
  - *Accepted:* {reason — e.g., pre-existing code outside diff scope, justified trade-off}

## Warnings
- {count} advisory warnings from {validator} ({brief context})

## Verdict
**PASS / PASS with warnings / FAIL** — {1-2 sentence summary with reasoning}
```

**Important formatting rules:**
- One line per validator in the summary table.
- List HARD violations with file location and rule.
- For each SHOULD violation, explain why it was accepted or flag it for fixing.
- Group warnings concisely — don't list every warning individually unless actionable.
- The verdict must explain the reasoning (e.g., "all violations are in pre-existing code outside the diff scope").
- Omit empty sections (e.g., if no HARD violations, don't include the HARD violations heading).

## Step 4: Verdict

If any HARD violations or unjustified SHOULD violations:
- **FAIL** - list what must be fixed

If only warnings:
- **PASS with warnings** - note them but don't block

If clean:
- **PASS** - ready for commit

Files in this skill

  • SKILL.md4.1 KB
  • contract.json974 B
  • tile.json208 B

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.