Adversarial Quarto-vs-Beamer parity QA. A critic agent compares the Quarto HTML render to the Beamer PDF benchmark for content/visual parity; a fixer agent applies fixes; loops until APPROVED (max 5 rounds). Use when user says "qa the quarto", "check parity", "does the html match the pdf?", "quarto matches beamer?", or after a translate-to-quarto run. Requires both the `.qmd` rendered and a `.pdf` benchmark.
Scanned 6/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow --skill qa-quarto --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Qa Quarto?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/pedrohcgs-qa-quarto)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: qa-quarto
description: Adversarial Quarto-vs-Beamer parity QA. A critic agent compares the Quarto HTML render to the Beamer PDF benchmark for content/visual parity; a fixer agent applies fixes; loops until APPROVED (max 5 rounds). Use when user says "qa the quarto", "check parity", "does the html match the pdf?", "quarto matches beamer?", or after a translate-to-quarto run. Requires both the `.qmd` rendered and a `.pdf` benchmark.
argument-hint: "[LectureN]"
allowed-tools: ["Read", "Grep", "Glob", "Write", "Edit", "Bash", "Task"]
context: fork
---
# Adversarial Quarto vs Beamer QA Workflow
Compare Quarto HTML slides against their Beamer PDF benchmark using an iterative critic/fixer loop.
**Philosophy:** The Beamer PDF is the gold standard. The Quarto translation must be at least as good in every dimension.
---
## Workflow
```
Phase 0: Pre-flight → Phase 1: Critic audit → Phase 2: Fixer → Phase 3: Re-audit → Loop until APPROVED (max 5 rounds)
```
## Hard Gates (Non-Negotiable)
| Gate | Condition |
|------|-----------|
| **Overflow** | NO content cut off |
| **Plot Quality** | Interactive charts >= static plots |
| **Content Parity** | No missing slides/equations/text |
| **Visual Regression** | Quarto >= Beamer in all dimensions |
| **Slide Centering** | Content centered, no jumping |
| **Notation Fidelity** | All math verbatim from Beamer |
## Phase 0: Pre-flight
1. Locate Beamer (.tex/.pdf) and Quarto (.qmd/.html) files
2. Check freshness (re-render if QMD newer than HTML)
3. Verify TikZ SVGs if applicable
## Phase 1: Initial Audit
Launch the `quarto-critic` agent to compare Beamer vs Quarto comprehensively. Report saved to `quality_reports/[Lecture]_qa_critic_round1.md`.
## Phase 2: Fix Cycle
If not APPROVED, launch `quarto-fixer` agent to apply fixes (Critical → Major → Minor), re-render, and verify.
## Phase 3: Re-Audit
Re-launch critic to verify fixes. Loop back to Phase 2 if needed.
## Iteration Limits — loop-until-dry
This is the **loop-until-dry** primitive from [`orchestrator-protocol.md`](../../rules/orchestrator-protocol.md): the critic returns `FINDING`s (the hard-gate table is the CRITICAL roll-up, per [`orchestration-schemas.md`](../../references/orchestration-schemas.md)); the loop **converges when a round adds 0 new CRITICAL/MAJOR** findings (deduped on `location`+`finding`), not at a fixed round count.
- **Fallback cap:** 5 rounds bounds a non-converging loop, then escalate to the user with remaining issues.
- **Two-strikes:** the same gate failing in rounds N and N+2 is flagged for the user, not patched again ([`summary-parity.md`](../../rules/summary-parity.md)).
- APPROVED iff every hard gate passes (zero CRITICAL).
## Final Report
Save to `quality_reports/[Lecture]_qa_final.md` with hard gate status, iteration summary, and remaining issues.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!