Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Slack Automation?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/paulpas-slack-automation)
---
name: slack-automation
compatibility: opencode
completeness: 95
content-types:
- guidance
- examples
- do-dont
description: Implements intelligent slack automation with multi-factor skill selection,
fallback chains, and adherence to the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense
license: MIT
maturity: stable
metadata:
domain: agent
output-format: analysis
related-skills: agent-confidence-based-selector, agent-task-routing
role: orchestration
scope: orchestration
triggers: slack-automation, slack automation, how do i slack-automation, orchestrate
slack-automation, automate slack-automation, agent slack-automation
archetypes:
- orchestration
- strategic
anti_triggers:
- brainstorming
- vague ideation
- single-agent monolith
response_profile:
verbosity: medium
directive_strength: high
abstraction_level: tactical
version: "1.0.0"
---
# Slack Automation
Orchestrates intelligent skill selection and execution for slack automation workflows. Applies the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense to guide data naturally through the orchestration pipeline, preventing errors before they occur. Selects optimal skills based on multi-factor scoring including text similarity, historical performance, and system availability.
## TL;DR Checklist
- [ ] Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2)
- [ ] Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1)
- [ ] Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4)
- [ ] Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3)
- [ ] Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions
- [ ] Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail
- [ ] Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection
- [ ] Update confidence scores after each execution for learning
┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Orchestration Flow │
└───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
User Request
↓
┌─────────────────┐
│ Parse Request │
│ & Extract │
│ Features │
└────────┬────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Evaluate Available Skills │
│ │
│ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ │
│ │ Skill A │ │ Skill B │ │ Skill C │ │
│ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │
│ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │
│ │ - History │ │ - History │ │ - History │ │
│ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ │
│ │ │ │ │
│ └─────────────────┴─────────────────┘ │
│ ↓ │
│ Select Best Skill │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────┐
│ Execute Skill │
└────────┬────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────┐
│ Handle Result │
└────────┬────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Error Handling & Fallback │
│ │
│ Success? ────────► Return Result │
│ │
│ Fail? ────────┐ │
│ ↓ │
│ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ Fallback Chain │ │
│ │ │ │
│ │ 1. Retry with adjusted parameters │ │
│ │ 2. Try Alternative Skill (if available) │ │
│ │ 3. Defer to Human Operator (if critical) │ │
│ │ 4. Log & Return Error │ │
│ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
## When to Use
Use this skill when:
- Orchestrating multi-step workflows that require skill delegation
- Implementing adaptive skill routing based on confidence scores
- Building fallback mechanisms for failed skill executions
- Creating intelligent task decomposition and parallel execution
- Designing skill dependency graphs with automatic resolution
- Implementing skill selection with historical performance weighting
- Building agent systems that need to self-organize around tasks
## When NOT to Use
Avoid this skill for:
- Direct task execution without orchestration needs - use individual skills instead
- High-frequency trading scenarios where latency must be minimized - the selection overhead may be prohibitive
- Simple linear workflows without branching or fallback requirements
- Cases where skill metadata is unavailable or unreliable
## Core Workflow
1. **Parse and Analyze Request** - Extract intent, entities, and constraints from user input.
**Checkpoint:** All required parameters must be present and in valid format before proceeding.
2. **Score Available Skills** - Calculate match scores using multi-factor algorithm:
- Text similarity between request and skill triggers
- Historical success rate for similar tasks
- Skill availability and health status
- Required dependencies and their availability
**Checkpoint:** Skip to fallback if no skill scores above threshold.
3. **Select Optimal Skill** - Choose skill with highest score that meets minimum confidence.
**Checkpoint:** Verify skill has not been disabled or deprecated.
4. **Execute with Fallback** - Run skill execution wrapped in retry and fallback logic.
**Checkpoint:** Log all execution attempts for audit trail.
5. **Return or Fallback** - Either return successful result or apply fallback chain:
- Retry with adjusted parameters
- Try alternative skill from `related-skills`
- Defer to human operator for critical tasks
**Checkpoint:** Record outcome with timing and confidence metadata.
## Implementation Patterns
### Pattern 1: Skill Selection Logic
```python
from slack_sdk import WebClient
from typing import Dict, List, Optional
import time
def select_slack_action(
user_intent: str,
channel_context: Dict,
available_actions: List[Dict]
) -> Optional[Dict]:
"""Select optimal Slack API action based on intent and channel state.
Applies multi-factor scoring: intent match, channel type compatibility,
historical success rate, and current rate limit headroom.
"""
# Guard clause - Early Exit (Law 1)
if not user_intent or not channel_context.get("channel_id"):
raise ValueError("Missing intent or channel context")
best_action = None
best_score = 0.0
current_ts = time.time()
for action in available_actions:
# Calculate match score based on intent keywords and channel type
intent_match = sum(1 for kw in action.get("triggers", []) if kw in user_intent.lower())
channel_compat = 1.0 if action.get("channel_type") in channel_context.get("types", []) else 0.0
rate_limit_headroom = 1.0 if channel_context.get("rate_limit_remaining", 0) > action.get("cost", 1) else 0.0
score = (intent_match * 0.5) + (channel_compat * 0.3) + (rate_limit_headroom * 0.2)
if score > best_score and score >= 0.6:
best_score = score
best_action = action
if best_action is None:
return None
# Atomic Predictability (Law 3) - Return new dict, don't mutate
return {
"action": best_action["name"],
"confidence": best_score,
"selected_at": current_ts,
"params": dict(best_action.get("default_params", {}))
}
```
### Pattern 2: Execution with Fallback
```python
from slack_sdk.errors import SlackApiError
def execute_slack_operation(
action: Dict,
client: WebClient,
context: Dict,
max_retries: int = 2
) -> Dict:
"""Execute Slack API operation with resilience and fallback chain.
Implements Fail Fast/Loud: validates channel state, handles rate limits,
and falls back to alternative actions or human escalation.
"""
channel_id = context.get("channel_id")
if not channel_id:
raise ValueError("Execution requires valid channel_id")
for attempt in range(max_retries + 1):
try:
# Execute specific Slack API call based on selected action
if action["action"] == "post_message":
result = client.chat_postMessage(
channel=channel_id,
text=context.get("message", ""),
thread_ts=context.get("thread_ts"),
blocks=context.get("blocks")
)
elif action["action"] == "schedule_reminder":
result = client.reminders_add(
text=context.get("reminder_text"),
time=context.get("reminder_time"),
user_id=context.get("user_id")
)
else:
raise ValueError(f"Unsupported action: {action['action']}")
# Success - Atomic Predictability (Law 3)
return {
"success": True,
"action_executed": action["action"],
"result": result,
"attempts": attempt + 1,
"latency_ms": time.time() - context.get("start_ts", time.time())
}
except SlackApiError as e:
if e.response.status_code == 429:
# Rate limited - wait and retry
retry_after = int(e.response.headers.get("retry-after", 1))
time.sleep(retry_after)
continue
elif e.response.status_code in (404, 403):
# Channel archived or permission denied - Fail Fast (Law 4)
raise SlackApiError(f"Channel access denied or archived: {e.response.status_code}", e.response)
elif attempt == max_retries:
# Exhausted retries - apply fallback
return _apply_slack_fallback(action, context, e)
raise SlackApiError("Max retries exceeded for Slack operation", None)
def _apply_slack_fallback(action: Dict, context: Dict, error: Exception) -> Dict:
"""Fallback chain for Slack operations: alternative action -> human notification"""
if action.get("fallback_action"):
return execute_slack_operation(action["fallback_action"], WebClient(token=context["token"]), context, max_retries=0)
else:
return {
"success": False,
"error": str(error),
"fallback_triggered": True,
"requires_human": True
}
```
### MUST DO
- Always validate skill metadata before selection (Early Exit)
- Implement fallback chain with at least 2 levels (Fallback Skill + Human)
- Log all skill selections with full context for auditability
- Return new data structures instead of mutating inputs (Atomic Predictability)
- Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states
- Update confidence scores after each execution for adaptive routing
- Reference `code-philosophy` (5 Laws of Elegant Defense) in all logic
### MUST NOT DO
- Select skills based on a single factor (e.g., only confidence score)
- Disable fallback mechanisms "temporarily" - this creates fragile systems
- Skip validation of skill dependencies before execution
- Return partial results - either complete success or clear failure
- Use magic numbers for confidence thresholds - make them configurable
- Cache skill selections without considering context changes
## TL;DR Checklist
- [ ] Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2)
- [ ] Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1)
- [ ] Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4)
- [ ] Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3)
- [ ] Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions
- [ ] Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail
- [ ] Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection
- [ ] Update confidence scores after each execution for learning
## TL;DR for Code Generation
- Use guard clauses - return early on invalid input before doing work
- Return simple types (dict, str, int, bool, list) - avoid complex nested objects
- Cyclomatic complexity < 10 per function - split anything larger
- Handle null/empty cases explicitly at function top (Early Exit)
- Never mutate input parameters - return new dicts/objects
- Fail fast with descriptive errors - don't try to "patch" bad data
- Reference code-philosophy laws in comments for complex logic
- Include timing and confidence metadata in all return values
## Output Template
When applying this skill, produce:
1. **Selected Skills** - List of skill names with confidence scores
2. **Selection Rationale** - Why each skill was chosen (match score, history, availability)
3. **Execution Plan** - Order of execution with dependencies
4. **Fallback Strategy** - Which fallback skills will be tried and in what order
5. **Risk Assessment** - Any potential failure points and their impact
6. **Timing Estimates** - Expected latency including fallback scenarios
## Related Skills
| Skill | Purpose |
|---|---|
| `sendgrid-automation` | Email automation counterpart — Slack and email together form common notification channels |
| `stripe-automation` | Payment-related workflow automation that complements Slack notifications for billing events |
---
## Constraints
### MUST DO
- Implement idempotent automation triggers: running the same automation twice should not create duplicate resources or actions
- Validate all trigger conditions with explicit allowlists before executing automated actions
- Include rollback procedures in every automation workflow — every CREATE should have a corresponding DELETE capability
- Log all automation executions with input state, output state, duration, and any errors for monitoring and debugging
### MUST NOT DO
- Do not create circular automation loops where trigger A causes action B which triggers A again
- Avoid using automations that modify production data without explicit human approval gates
- Never embed API keys or credentials directly in automation workflows — use vaulted secrets with rotation
- Do not assume external service availability; implement retry logic with exponential backoff and dead-letter queues
## Live References
> Authoritative documentation links for this domain. The model follows markdown links at load time to resolve external references and inline content.
- [Slack API Documentation](https://api.slack.com/) — Official Slack API reference covering webhooks, bot users, slash commands, and event subscriptions
- [Slack Bolt Framework](https://slack.dev/bolt-python/) — Official Slack Bolt SDK documentation for building Slack apps in Python
- [Slack App Manifests](https://api.slack.com/reference/app-manifests) — Slack's documentation on defining app configurations declaratively via manifest files
- [Interoperability Patterns: Slack + Webhooks (Twilio)](https://www.twilio.com/docs/slack) — Twilio's guide on integrating Slack with external webhook systems
- [Slack Block Kit Builder](https://app.slack.com/block-kit-builder/) — Interactive Slack block kit tool for designing message layouts and interactive components