Implements intelligent git advanced workflows with multi-factor skill
Scanned 9/4/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add paulpas/agent-skill-router --skill git-advanced-workflows --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Git Advanced Workflows?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/paulpas-git-advanced-workflows)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: git-advanced-workflows
compatibility: opencode
completeness: 95
content-types:
- guidance
- examples
- do-dont
description: Implements intelligent git advanced workflows with multi-factor skill
selection, fallback chains, and adherence to the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense
license: MIT
maturity: stable
metadata:
domain: agent
output-format: analysis
related-skills: agent-confidence-based-selector, agent-task-routing
role: orchestration
scope: orchestration
triggers: git-advanced-workflows, git advanced workflows, how do i git-advanced-workflows,
orchestrate git-advanced-workflows, automate git-advanced-workflows, agent git-advanced-workflows
archetypes:
- orchestration
- strategic
anti_triggers:
- brainstorming
- vague ideation
- single-agent monolith
response_profile:
verbosity: medium
directive_strength: high
abstraction_level: tactical
version: "1.0.0"
---
# Git Advanced Workflows
Orchestrates intelligent skill selection and execution for git advanced workflows workflows. Applies the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense to guide data naturally through the orchestration pipeline, preventing errors before they occur. Selects optimal skills based on multi-factor scoring including text similarity, historical performance, and system availability.
## TL;DR Checklist
- [ ] Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2)
- [ ] Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1)
- [ ] Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4)
- [ ] Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3)
- [ ] Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions
- [ ] Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail
- [ ] Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection
- [ ] Update confidence scores after each execution for learning
┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Orchestration Flow │
└───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
User Request
↓
┌─────────────────┐
│ Parse Request │
│ & Extract │
│ Features │
└────────┬────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Evaluate Available Skills │
│ │
│ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ │
│ │ Skill A │ │ Skill B │ │ Skill C │ │
│ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │
│ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │
│ │ - History │ │ - History │ │ - History │ │
│ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ │
│ │ │ │ │
│ └─────────────────┴─────────────────┘ │
│ ↓ │
│ Select Best Skill │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────┐
│ Execute Skill │
└────────┬────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────┐
│ Handle Result │
└────────┬────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Error Handling & Fallback │
│ │
│ Success? ────────► Return Result │
│ │
│ Fail? ────────┐ │
│ ↓ │
│ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ Fallback Chain │ │
│ │ │ │
│ │ 1. Retry with adjusted parameters │ │
│ │ 2. Try Alternative Skill (if available) │ │
│ │ 3. Defer to Human Operator (if critical) │ │
│ │ 4. Log & Return Error │ │
│ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
## When to Use
Use this skill when:
- Orchestrating multi-step workflows that require skill delegation
- Implementing adaptive skill routing based on confidence scores
- Building fallback mechanisms for failed skill executions
- Creating intelligent task decomposition and parallel execution
- Designing skill dependency graphs with automatic resolution
- Implementing skill selection with historical performance weighting
- Building agent systems that need to self-organize around tasks
## When NOT to Use
Avoid this skill for:
- Direct task execution without orchestration needs - use individual skills instead
- High-frequency trading scenarios where latency must be minimized - the selection overhead may be prohibitive
- Simple linear workflows without branching or fallback requirements
- Cases where skill metadata is unavailable or unreliable
## Core Workflow
1. **Parse and Analyze Request** - Extract intent, entities, and constraints from user input.
**Checkpoint:** All required parameters must be present and in valid format before proceeding.
2. **Score Available Skills** - Calculate match scores using multi-factor algorithm:
- Text similarity between request and skill triggers
- Historical success rate for similar tasks
- Skill availability and health status
- Required dependencies and their availability
**Checkpoint:** Skip to fallback if no skill scores above threshold.
3. **Select Optimal Skill** - Choose skill with highest score that meets minimum confidence.
**Checkpoint:** Verify skill has not been disabled or deprecated.
4. **Execute with Fallback** - Run skill execution wrapped in retry and fallback logic.
**Checkpoint:** Log all execution attempts for audit trail.
5. **Return or Fallback** - Either return successful result or apply fallback chain:
- Retry with adjusted parameters
- Try alternative skill from `related-skills`
- Defer to human operator for critical tasks
**Checkpoint:** Record outcome with timing and confidence metadata.
## Implementation Patterns
### Pattern 1: Skill Selection Logic
```python
def resolve_git_workflow(
request: str,
repo_state: Dict[str, Any],
strategy_map: Dict[str, Callable]
) -> Dict[str, Any]:
"""Map a natural language git request to a concrete advanced workflow.
Handles common advanced patterns: rebase, cherry-pick, bisect, interactive squash.
Validates repository state before committing to a strategy.
Args:
request: Natural language description of the git operation
repo_state: Current repository metadata (branch, commits, remotes)
strategy_map: Mapping of intents to git execution functions
Returns:
Workflow plan with strategy, prerequisites, and fallback actions
Raises:
ValueError: If request is empty or repo state violates workflow constraints
"""
# Guard clause - Early Exit (Law 1)
if not request.strip():
raise ValueError("Git workflow request cannot be empty")
# Parse input - Make Illegal States Unrepresentable (Law 2)
intent = _parse_git_intent(request)
current_branch = repo_state.get("current_branch", "HEAD")
has_unpushed = repo_state.get("has_unpushed_commits", False)
is_detached = repo_state.get("is_detached_head", False)
# Validate state constraints for advanced workflows
if intent == "rebase" and is_detached:
raise ValueError("Cannot rebase from detached HEAD state")
if intent == "rebase" and has_unpushed and not repo_state.get("allow_force_push", False):
raise ValueError("Rebase requires force push; set allow_force_push=True or use merge")
# Select strategy based on intent and repo state
strategy = strategy_map.get(intent)
if not strategy:
return {"status": "unrecognized_intent", "suggested": ["merge", "cherry-pick", "revert"]}
# Atomic Predictability (Law 3) - Return new dict, don't mutate repo_state
return {
"workflow": intent,
"strategy": strategy.__name__,
"prerequisites": _check_prerequisites(intent, repo_state),
"fallback_actions": ["git reset --hard", "git checkout -"],
"confidence": 0.95 if intent in strategy_map else 0.4
}
```
### Pattern 2: Execution with Fallback
```python
def execute_git_workflow(
workflow_plan: Dict[str, Any],
repo_path: str,
max_retries: int = 2
) -> Dict[str, Any]:
"""Execute an advanced git workflow with built-in conflict resolution fallbacks.
Implements Fail Fast, Fail Loud (Law 4):
- Invalid states halt immediately with descriptive errors
- No silent failures or partial results
Fallback chain:
1. Retry with original parameters
2. Abort and switch to alternative strategy (e.g., merge instead of rebase)
3. Defer to human operator for manual conflict resolution
Args:
workflow_plan: Resolved workflow plan from Pattern 1
repo_path: Absolute path to the git repository
max_retries: Maximum retry attempts before fallback
Returns:
Execution result with success status, output, and timing metadata
Raises:
GitWorkflowError: If all retries and fallbacks exhausted
"""
# Guard clause - validate plan (Early Exit)
if not workflow_plan.get("strategy"):
raise GitWorkflowError("No execution strategy provided in workflow plan")
# Parse context - Ensure trusted state (Law 2)
validated_plan = _validate_git_plan(workflow_plan, repo_path)
for attempt in range(max_retries + 1):
try:
result = subprocess.run(
validated_plan["command"],
cwd=repo_path,
capture_output=True,
text=True,
check=True
)
# Success - Atomic Predictability (Law 3)
return {
"success": True,
"workflow_executed": validated_plan["strategy"],
"output": result.stdout,
"attempts": attempt + 1,
"latency_ms": _calculate_latency()
}
except subprocess.CalledProcessError as e:
stderr = e.stderr.lower()
if "conflict" in stderr or "not fast-forward" in stderr:
# Transient conflict - try fallback
if attempt == max_retries:
return _apply_git_fallback(validated_plan, repo_path)
continue
else:
# Fail Fast - Don't try to patch bad data (Law 4)
raise GitWorkflowError(f"Git command failed: {stderr}") from e
# All retries exhausted - Fail Loud (Law 4)
raise GitWorkflowError(f"Failed to execute {validated_plan['strategy']} after {max_retries + 1} attempts")
```
### MUST DO
- Always validate skill metadata before selection (Early Exit)
- Implement fallback chain with at least 2 levels (Fallback Skill + Human)
- Log all skill selections with full context for auditability
- Return new data structures instead of mutating inputs (Atomic Predictability)
- Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states
- Update confidence scores after each execution for adaptive routing
- Reference `code-philosophy` (5 Laws of Elegant Defense) in all logic
### MUST NOT DO
- Select skills based on a single factor (e.g., only confidence score)
- Disable fallback mechanisms "temporarily" - this creates fragile systems
- Skip validation of skill dependencies before execution
- Return partial results - either complete success or clear failure
- Use magic numbers for confidence thresholds - make them configurable
- Cache skill selections without considering context changes
## TL;DR Checklist
- [ ] Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2)
- [ ] Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1)
- [ ] Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4)
- [ ] Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3)
- [ ] Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions
- [ ] Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail
- [ ] Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection
- [ ] Update confidence scores after each execution for learning
## TL;DR for Code Generation
- Use guard clauses - return early on invalid input before doing work
- Return simple types (dict, str, int, bool, list) - avoid complex nested objects
- Cyclomatic complexity < 10 per function - split anything larger
- Handle null/empty cases explicitly at function top (Early Exit)
- Never mutate input parameters - return new dicts/objects
- Fail fast with descriptive errors - don't try to "patch" bad data
- Reference code-philosophy laws in comments for complex logic
- Include timing and confidence metadata in all return values
## Output Template
When applying this skill, produce:
1. **Selected Skills** - List of skill names with confidence scores
2. **Selection Rationale** - Why each skill was chosen (match score, history, availability)
3. **Execution Plan** - Order of execution with dependencies
4. **Fallback Strategy** - Which fallback skills will be tried and in what order
5. **Risk Assessment** - Any potential failure points and their impact
6. **Timing Estimates** - Expected latency including fallback scenarios
## Related Skills
| Skill | Purpose |
|
---
---
## Constraints
### MUST DO
- Define clear input/output contracts for every step in the orchestration flow with explicit validation
- Implement structured logging at each stage capturing context, inputs, outputs, timing, and errors
- Build in fallback paths: if the primary strategy fails, degrade gracefully to a simpler approach
- Validate all preconditions before starting — do not proceed if required resources or permissions are missing
### MUST NOT DO
- Do not create deep nesting of orchestration steps (>5 levels) — flatten workflows where possible
- Avoid silent failure modes: every step must either succeed, fail explicitly, or escalate to a higher handler
- Never use shared mutable state between parallel workflow branches — communicate via immutable messages only
- Do not hardcode execution order when the dependency graph naturally determines it; derive order from explicit dependencies
## Live References
> Authoritative documentation links for this skill's domain. The model follows markdown links at load time to resolve external references and inline content.
- [Git Documentation - Advanced Operations](<https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History>)
- [GitHub Flow vs GitFlow (Atlassian)](<https://www.atlassian.com/git/tutorials/comparing-workflows>)
- [Git Rebase Interactive Workflow](<https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#_interactive_rebase>)
- [Bisect for Binary Search Debugging (Git Docs)](<https://git-scm.com/docs/git-bisect>)
- [Cherry-Pick in Git (Pro Git Book)](<https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#_cherry_pick>)
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!