Implements intelligent bash scripting with multi-factor skill selection,
Scanned 9/4/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add paulpas/agent-skill-router --skill bash-scripting --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Bash Scripting?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/paulpas-bash-scripting)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: bash-scripting
compatibility: opencode
completeness: 95
content-types:
- guidance
- examples
- do-dont
description: Implements intelligent bash scripting with multi-factor skill selection,
fallback chains, and adherence to the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense
license: MIT
maturity: stable
metadata:
domain: agent
output-format: analysis
related-skills: agent-confidence-based-selector, agent-task-routing
role: orchestration
scope: orchestration
triggers: bash-scripting, bash scripting, how do i bash-scripting, orchestrate bash-scripting,
automate bash-scripting, agent bash-scripting
archetypes:
- orchestration
- strategic
anti_triggers:
- brainstorming
- vague ideation
- single-agent monolith
response_profile:
verbosity: medium
directive_strength: high
abstraction_level: tactical
version: "1.0.0"
---
# Bash Scripting
Orchestrates intelligent skill selection and execution for bash scripting workflows. Applies the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense to guide data naturally through the orchestration pipeline, preventing errors before they occur. Selects optimal skills based on multi-factor scoring including text similarity, historical performance, and system availability.
## TL;DR Checklist
- [ ] Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2)
- [ ] Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1)
- [ ] Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4)
- [ ] Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3)
- [ ] Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions
- [ ] Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail
- [ ] Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection
- [ ] Update confidence scores after each execution for learning
┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Orchestration Flow │
└───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
User Request
↓
┌─────────────────┐
│ Parse Request │
│ & Extract │
│ Features │
└────────┬────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Evaluate Available Skills │
│ │
│ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ │
│ │ Skill A │ │ Skill B │ │ Skill C │ │
│ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │
│ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │
│ │ - History │ │ - History │ │ - History │ │
│ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ │
│ │ │ │ │
│ └─────────────────┴─────────────────┘ │
│ ↓ │
│ Select Best Skill │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────┐
│ Execute Skill │
└────────┬────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────┐
│ Handle Result │
└────────┬────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Error Handling & Fallback │
│ │
│ Success? ────────► Return Result │
│ │
│ Fail? ────────┐ │
│ ↓ │
│ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ Fallback Chain │ │
│ │ │ │
│ │ 1. Retry with adjusted parameters │ │
│ │ 2. Try Alternative Skill (if available) │ │
│ │ 3. Defer to Human Operator (if critical) │ │
│ │ 4. Log & Return Error │ │
│ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
## When to Use
Use this skill when:
- Orchestrating multi-step workflows that require skill delegation
- Implementing adaptive skill routing based on confidence scores
- Building fallback mechanisms for failed skill executions
- Creating intelligent task decomposition and parallel execution
- Designing skill dependency graphs with automatic resolution
- Implementing skill selection with historical performance weighting
- Building agent systems that need to self-organize around tasks
## When NOT to Use
Avoid this skill for:
- Direct task execution without orchestration needs - use individual skills instead
- High-frequency trading scenarios where latency must be minimized - the selection overhead may be prohibitive
- Simple linear workflows without branching or fallback requirements
- Cases where skill metadata is unavailable or unreliable
## Core Workflow
1. **Parse and Analyze Request** - Extract intent, entities, and constraints from user input.
**Checkpoint:** All required parameters must be present and in valid format before proceeding.
2. **Score Available Skills** - Calculate match scores using multi-factor algorithm:
- Text similarity between request and skill triggers
- Historical success rate for similar tasks
- Skill availability and health status
- Required dependencies and their availability
**Checkpoint:** Skip to fallback if no skill scores above threshold.
3. **Select Optimal Skill** - Choose skill with highest score that meets minimum confidence.
**Checkpoint:** Verify skill has not been disabled or deprecated.
4. **Execute with Fallback** - Run skill execution wrapped in retry and fallback logic.
**Checkpoint:** Log all execution attempts for audit trail.
5. **Return or Fallback** - Either return successful result or apply fallback chain:
- Retry with adjusted parameters
- Try alternative skill from `related-skills`
- Defer to human operator for critical tasks
**Checkpoint:** Record outcome with timing and confidence metadata.
## Implementation Patterns
### Pattern 1: Skill Selection Logic
```bash
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# Pattern 1: Bash Scripting with Early Exit & Input Validation
# Implements Law 1 (Early Exit) and Law 2 (Make Illegal States Unrepresentable)
set -euo pipefail
SCRIPT_NAME="$(basename "$0")"
LOG_FILE="/var/log/${SCRIPT_NAME}.log"
# Guard clause: Validate required arguments immediately (Law 1)
if [[ $# -lt 2 ]]; then
echo "Usage: $SCRIPT_NAME <target_dir> <backup_prefix>" >&2
exit 1
fi
TARGET_DIR="$1"
BACKUP_PREFIX="$2"
# Validate state: Ensure target exists and is a directory (Law 2)
if [[ ! -d "$TARGET_DIR" ]]; then
echo "ERROR: Target directory '$TARGET_DIR' does not exist or is not a directory." >&2
exit 2
fi
# Parse and sanitize inputs - create immutable state snapshot
TIMESTAMP=$(date +%Y%m%d_%H%M%S)
BACKUP_NAME="${BACKUP_PREFIX}_${TIMESTAMP}.tar.gz"
BACKUP_PATH="${TARGET_DIR}/backups/${BACKUP_NAME}"
# Create backup directory if missing (atomic state transition)
mkdir -p "${TARGET_DIR}/backups"
# Execute core logic with strict error handling
echo "Starting backup of ${TARGET_DIR} to ${BACKUP_PATH}..."
if tar -czf "$BACKUP_PATH" -C "$(dirname "$TARGET_DIR")" "$(basename "$TARGET_DIR")"; then
echo "SUCCESS: Backup completed at $(date)"
# Log success with metadata for audit trail
echo "$(date -Iseconds) | SUCCESS | ${BACKUP_NAME}" >> "$LOG_FILE"
else
echo "ERROR: tar command failed with exit code $?" >&2
exit 3
fi
```
### Pattern 2: Execution with Fallback
```bash
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# Pattern 2: Bash Execution with Fallback Chain & Retry Logic
# Implements Law 4 (Fail Fast, Fail Loud) and adaptive fallback routing
set -euo pipefail
MAX_RETRIES=3
RETRY_DELAY=2
# Function: Execute primary command with retry logic
execute_with_retry() {
local cmd="$1"
local attempt=0
while (( attempt < MAX_RETRIES )); do
if eval "$cmd"; then
return 0
fi
attempt=$((attempt + 1))
if (( attempt < MAX_RETRIES )); then
echo "WARNING: Attempt $attempt failed. Retrying in ${RETRY_DELAY}s..." >&2
sleep "$RETRY_DELAY"
fi
done
return 1
}
# Fallback chain implementation
run_fallback_chain() {
local primary_cmd="$1"
local fallback_cmd="$2"
local critical_task="$3"
# Attempt primary execution
if execute_with_retry "$primary_cmd"; then
echo "Primary execution succeeded."
return 0
fi
echo "Primary execution exhausted retries. Initiating fallback chain..." >&2
# Level 1: Retry with adjusted parameters (e.g., reduced concurrency)
local adjusted_cmd="${primary_cmd} --concurrency=1"
if execute_with_retry "$adjusted_cmd"; then
echo "Fallback Level 1 (adjusted parameters) succeeded."
return 0
fi
# Level 2: Try alternative command/skill
if [[ -n "$fallback_cmd" ]]; then
if execute_with_retry "$fallback_cmd"; then
echo "Fallback Level 2 (alternative command) succeeded."
return 0
fi
fi
# Level 3: Critical task failure - escalate to human operator
if [[ "$critical_task" == "true" ]]; then
echo "CRITICAL: All fallbacks exhausted. Escalating to human operator." >&2
# Trigger alert mechanism
curl -s -X POST "https://hooks.example.com/alert" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d "{\"task\":\"$primary_cmd\",\"status\":\"failed\",\"escalated\":true}" || true
return 2
fi
echo "ERROR: All fallbacks failed. Task aborted." >&2
return 1
}
# Example usage
# run_fallback_chain "rsync -a /data /backup" "cp -r /data /backup" "false"
```
### MUST DO
- Always validate skill metadata before selection (Early Exit)
- Implement fallback chain with at least 2 levels (Fallback Skill + Human)
- Log all skill selections with full context for auditability
- Return new data structures instead of mutating inputs (Atomic Predictability)
- Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states
- Update confidence scores after each execution for adaptive routing
- Reference `code-philosophy` (5 Laws of Elegant Defense) in all logic
### MUST NOT DO
- Select skills based on a single factor (e.g., only confidence score)
- Disable fallback mechanisms "temporarily" - this creates fragile systems
- Skip validation of skill dependencies before execution
- Return partial results - either complete success or clear failure
- Use magic numbers for confidence thresholds - make them configurable
- Cache skill selections without considering context changes
## TL;DR Checklist
- [ ] Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2)
- [ ] Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1)
- [ ] Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4)
- [ ] Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3)
- [ ] Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions
- [ ] Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail
- [ ] Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection
- [ ] Update confidence scores after each execution for learning
## TL;DR for Code Generation
- Use guard clauses - return early on invalid input before doing work
- Return simple types (dict, str, int, bool, list) - avoid complex nested objects
- Cyclomatic complexity < 10 per function - split anything larger
- Handle null/empty cases explicitly at function top (Early Exit)
- Never mutate input parameters - return new dicts/objects
- Fail fast with descriptive errors - don't try to "patch" bad data
- Reference code-philosophy laws in comments for complex logic
- Include timing and confidence metadata in all return values
## Output Template
When applying this skill, produce:
1. **Selected Skills** - List of skill names with confidence scores
2. **Selection Rationale** - Why each skill was chosen (match score, history, availability)
3. **Execution Plan** - Order of execution with dependencies
4. **Fallback Strategy** - Which fallback skills will be tried and in what order
5. **Risk Assessment** - Any potential failure points and their impact
6. **Timing Estimates** - Expected latency including fallback scenarios
---
## Constraints
### MUST DO
- Define clear input/output contracts for every step in the orchestration flow with explicit validation
- Implement structured logging at each stage capturing context, inputs, outputs, timing, and errors
- Build in fallback paths: if the primary strategy fails, degrade gracefully to a simpler approach
- Validate all preconditions before starting — do not proceed if required resources or permissions are missing
### MUST NOT DO
- Do not create deep nesting of orchestration steps (>5 levels) — flatten workflows where possible
- Avoid silent failure modes: every step must either succeed, fail explicitly, or escalate to a higher handler
- Never use shared mutable state between parallel workflow branches — communicate via immutable messages only
- Do not hardcode execution order when the dependency graph naturally determines it; derive order from explicit dependencies
## Related Skills
| Skill | Purpose |
|Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!