Requires SIFAP EARS requirements to use REQ-NNN, valid source_legacy evidence, Given/When/Then acceptance criteria, and test lineage. Use when editing specifications or requirement artifacts.
Scanned 9/4/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add paulasilvatech/awesome-harness-primitives --skill sifap-requirements --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Sifap Requirements?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/paulasilvatech-sifap-requirements)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: sifap-requirements
description: >-
Requires SIFAP EARS requirements to use REQ-NNN, valid source_legacy evidence, Given/When/Then
acceptance criteria, and test lineage. Use when editing specifications or requirement artifacts.
paths:
- specs/**/*.md
- 02-modern-spec/**/*.md
- 01-archaeology/**/*rules*.md
user-invocable: false
---
<!-- Generated from harness/github-copilot/plugins/mainframe-natural-adabas-classic/instructions/sifap-requirements.instructions.md by harness/claude-code/scripts/convert_from_copilot.py. Edit the source, not this file. -->
# SIFAP requirements conventions - EARS and lineage
These instructions apply to SIFAP requirement and rule artifacts. They are authoritative for identifier
shape, source lineage, and acceptance form; `sifap-requirements-traceability` owns the ordered authoring
and deterministic validation workflow.
## Requirement identity and source
- Use exactly `REQ-NNN` with three digits until an approved repository-wide migration changes it.
- Express one behavior per requirement with an active `SHALL` response.
- Add one `source_legacy:` value within 20 lines of each approved declaration.
- Cite an existing approved corpus file or `[GREENFIELD]` plus a concrete justification.
- Keep candidates with unknown sources outside the approved requirement set.
## Acceptance and tests
- Write concrete Given/When/Then acceptance behavior tied to the same `REQ-NNN`.
- Cite the identifier in requirement-backed tests.
- Report completeness by requirement and risk; use line or branch thresholds only when build configuration
defines them.
- Treat code/spec drift as a decision question, not proof that either side is automatically correct.
## Conventions
| Rule | Rationale |
| --- | --- |
| Use one `REQ-NNN` namespace | Specifications, tests, and validators stay aligned. |
| Require real source evidence | Generated requirements cannot invent legacy behavior. |
| Keep one behavior per requirement | Acceptance tests remain discriminating and traceable. |
| Separate greenfield decisions | New obligations are not misrepresented as legacy parity. |
## Do / Do Not
| Do | Do not |
| --- | --- |
| Run the traceability validator | Approve placeholder sources |
| Keep ambiguity as an owned question | Silently choose a business interpretation |
| Use Given/When/Then for behavior | Put implementation details in functional requirements |
| Cite inspected code | Trust comments or generated prose without corroboration |
## Checklist Before Opening a PR
- [ ] Every approved requirement has a unique `REQ-NNN`.
- [ ] Every statement is atomic, testable, and uses the applicable EARS form.
- [ ] Every source resolves to evidence or a justified `[GREENFIELD]` decision.
- [ ] Acceptance criteria are concrete and requirement-backed tests cite the ID.
- [ ] The traceability validator passes with no placeholders.
- [ ] Unknowns, contradictions, and unrun checks are reported explicitly.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!