Use when editing tracked SDD artifacts that require naming, EARS, traceability, evidence, or status conventions.
Scanned 9/4/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add paulasilvatech/awesome-harness-primitives --skill sdd-artifacts --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Sdd Artifacts?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/paulasilvatech-sdd-artifacts)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: sdd-artifacts
description: >-
Use when editing tracked SDD artifacts that require naming, EARS, traceability, evidence, or
status conventions.
paths:
- ".specs/**/*.md"
- ".specs/**/*.yaml"
- ".specs/**/*.json"
user-invocable: false
---
<!-- Generated from harness/github-copilot/plugins/open-horizons-platform/instructions/sdd-artifacts.instructions.md by harness/claude-code/scripts/convert_from_copilot.py. Edit the source, not this file. -->
# Specification-Driven Development Artifacts
The `sdd-spec-engineer` skill owns lifecycle and generation procedures. These instructions own only the durable shape of files under `.specs/`.
## Conventions
- Name feature directories with a zero-padded numeric prefix and kebab-case slug, matching the `feature_id` in artifact frontmatter.
- Use the established uppercase artifact names such as `SPECIFICATION.md`, `DESIGN.md`, `TASKS.md`, `SOURCE_TRACEABILITY.md`, `VERIFICATION.md`, and `DECISIONS.md`.
- Give every normative requirement a unique stable ID and one observable EARS response using `SHALL`; do not reuse retired IDs for different behavior.
- Give acceptance criteria stable IDs tied to their parent requirement.
- Preserve bidirectional traceability from source and decision through requirement, design, task, test, verification, and evidence.
- Distinguish requested, brownfield, official, repository-constraint, and greenfield claims; greenfield behavior requires an explicit decision.
- Treat live-state claims as dated evidence with source, scope, result, and freshness limits. Plans and expected output are not proof of execution.
- Keep status, implementation state, blockers, and verification results truthful; use `PENDING` or `BLOCKED` when evidence is absent.
- Redact credentials, personal data, private tenant details, and sensitive command output from evidence.
## Verification
- Required artifacts, metadata, IDs, and cross-references are internally consistent.
- Every active requirement maps to acceptance, implementation, and verification evidence or an explicit blocker.
- Artifact-only validation is not reported as implementation success.
## Do / Do Not
| Do | Do not |
| --- | --- |
| Preserve stable IDs, explicit source classes, and bidirectional traceability. | Reuse retired IDs or present plans as executed evidence. |
| Keep unknown status and missing evidence visible. | Invent metrics, live state, acceptance, or verification results. |
## Checklist Before Opening a PR
- [ ] The change matches this instruction's `applyTo` scope.
- [ ] Requirement, acceptance, decision, task, test, and evidence IDs resolve.
- [ ] Status and blockers match available evidence.
- [ ] Sensitive data is redacted from traceability and verification artifacts.
- [ ] Artifact checks pass without claiming implementation success.

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!