Generate a Packmind feature specification from a GitHub issue, file, URL, or direct description. Breaks Phase 3 into 4 fine-grained approval gates (domain data structures, ports/use cases/routes, frontend components, implementation plan) to catch problems early. Routes work between the OSS sibling (../packmind) and the proprietary repo (cwd). Outputs spec artifacts under tmp/feature-specs/{slug}/ for use with /feature-sprint.
Pro scans all 8 files and shows the line behind each finding
Scanned 9/23/2026
npx -y skills add PackmindHub/packmind --skill feature-spec --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Feature Spec?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/packmindhub-feature-spec)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.
---
name: 'feature-spec'
description: 'Generate a Packmind feature specification from a GitHub issue, file, URL, or direct description. Breaks Phase 3 into 4 fine-grained approval gates (domain data structures, ports/use cases/routes, frontend components, implementation plan) to catch problems early. Routes work between the OSS sibling (../packmind) and the proprietary repo (cwd). Outputs spec artifacts under tmp/feature-specs/{slug}/ for use with /feature-sprint.'
---
# Feature Spec Skill
Generate a comprehensive feature specification grounded in Packmind's hexagonal architecture, frontend gateway/PM-UI conventions, and the OSS/proprietary fork boundary.
## When to Use
Use this skill when the user wants to:
- Plan a new feature, fix, or refactor that spans Packmind's stack
- Convert a GitHub issue, design doc, or rough idea into a structured spec
- Get fine-grained validation of data structures, routes, and components before committing to a plan
**Do NOT use** for trivial one-line fixes or pure dependency bumps.
## Packmind Repo Layout (essential context)
- Closed-source fork (`packmind-proprietary`): the current working directory when this skill runs.
- Open-source repo (`packmind`): the sibling directory at `../packmind` (cloned next to the proprietary repo). Resolve to an absolute path at runtime with `realpath ../packmind`.
- **Most feature work happens on the OSS repo and auto-merges into the proprietary fork.** The proprietary fork only contains paid/closed features (e.g. `packages/editions`, certain `packages/deployments` extensions). After an OSS merge, you typically pull on the proprietary side.
- Architecture: hexagonal (`packages/{domain}/{domain,application,infra}`), NestJS API at `apps/api`, React+`@packmind/ui` frontend at `apps/frontend`, TypeORM, Jest+@swc/jest.
## Input Sources
| Source | Examples | Detection |
|--------|----------|-----------|
| GitHub | `#123`, `owner/repo#123`, full issue URL | Pattern `#\d+` or `github.com/.../issues/` |
| File | `file:spec.md`, `path/to/spec.md` | Prefix `file:` or readable file |
| URL | `https://...` | HTTP(S) URL (non-GitHub) |
| Prompt | Any other text | Default |
## Workflow Phases
Execute phases **sequentially**. Phases 1 and 4 run seamlessly (no approval gate). Phases 2 and 3 require user approval before proceeding.
| Phase | File | Purpose | Gate |
|-------|------|---------|------|
| 1 | `phase-1-resolve-source.md` | Detect source type, fetch content, decide OSS-vs-proprietary routing, create state | seamless |
| 2 | `phase-2-discovery-and-spec.md` | Research Packmind patterns (reference domain, hex layers, frontend conventions), draft acceptance criteria, generate functional spec | approval |
| 3 | `phase-3-implementation.md` | Technical approach + implementation plan (4 subtasks below) | 4 approvals |
| 3A | ↳ Subtask 3A | Validate domain data structures (entities, value objects, events, migrations) | approval |
| 3B | ↳ Subtask 3B | Validate ports, contracts, use cases, services, adapters, NestJS routes | approval |
| 3C | ↳ Subtask 3C | Validate frontend components, gateways, query hooks, PM-UI usage | approval |
| 3D | ↳ Subtask 3D | Generate full implementation plan (task breakdown, grouping, coverage) | approval |
| 4 | `phase-4-finalize.md` | Generate `context.md`, mark spec complete, report (no commit — artifacts live in `tmp/`) | seamless |
## State Management
State is persisted to markdown files under a git-ignored `tmp/` directory for cross-session continuity. Phase progress is inferred from which output files exist — no separate state file needed.
```
tmp/feature-specs/{slug}/
├── {slug}.md # Main spec (status: DRAFT → COMPLETE in frontmatter)
├── discovery.md # Phase 2 output (YAML frontmatter + markdown)
├── functional-spec.md # Phase 2 output (informed by discovery)
├── implementation-plan.md # Phase 3 output (includes parallel groups section)
└── context.md # Phase 4 output (YAML frontmatter + markdown)
```
### Phase Detection (Resume Logic)
| Files Present | Completed Phase | Resume At |
|---------------|----------------|-----------|
| `{slug}.md` only | Phase 1 | Phase 2 |
| + `discovery.md`, `functional-spec.md` | Phase 2 | Phase 3 |
| + `implementation-plan.md` | Phase 3 | Phase 4 |
| + `context.md` (status: COMPLETE) | Phase 4 | Done |
## Invocation
### Auto-Detection (Resuming)
Before starting, check for an existing task directory at `tmp/feature-specs/{slug}/`:
1. Check which output files exist to determine current phase (see Phase Detection table above)
2. Read the main spec file's YAML frontmatter for `status: DRAFT|COMPLETE`
3. If resuming, display:
```
**Resuming Feature Spec**: {slug}
**Current Phase**: {detected_phase}
**Status**: {status from frontmatter}
Continue from Phase {detected_phase}? (Y/n)
```
4. If user confirms, proceed to the appropriate phase file
5. If no task directory found, start a new feature spec
### Starting New
To start a new feature spec: Read `phase-1-resolve-source.md` and follow its instructions.
<feature-spec-rules>
<rule>Execute phases SEQUENTIALLY — never skip phases</rule>
<rule>Phases 1 and 4 proceed automatically — no approval gate</rule>
<rule>Phases 2 and 3 require USER APPROVAL via AskUserQuestion before proceeding</rule>
<rule>Save all artifacts under tmp/feature-specs/{slug}/ — never under tracked folders</rule>
<rule>Use Task tool with Explore subagent for codebase research; never read 50 files yourself</rule>
<rule>Agent NEVER implements code in this skill — output ONLY specification documents</rule>
<rule>Main spec file has status DRAFT until Phase 4 completes</rule>
<rule>Always record target_repo (oss | proprietary | both) decided in Phase 1; consumed by /feature-sprint</rule>
<rule>Never invent OSS/proprietary boundaries — if unsure, ask the user</rule>
</feature-spec-rules>
## Output
Final deliverable: `tmp/feature-specs/{slug}/{slug}.md` + sibling artifacts.
Contains:
- Functional specification with acceptance criteria
- Technical approach grounded in Packmind reference patterns
- Implementation plan with phased tasks (each task has reference `file:line` patterns)
- Parallel Groups section (for parallel execution via `/feature-sprint`)
- `target_repo`: oss | proprietary | both
## Parallel Execution Support
Phase 3 includes a grouping step that analyzes task dependencies and creates parallel execution groups:
**How grouping works:**
1. After generating the implementation plan, a Plan subagent analyzes tasks
2. Tasks are grouped by file dependencies (tasks sharing files go together)
3. Groups are non-overlapping (no file belongs to multiple groups)
4. Results are stored in `implementation-plan.md` (Parallel Groups section) and `context.md` (YAML frontmatter)
**When grouping is skipped:**
- Tasks have no clear file dependencies
- Single-file or trivial implementations
- User opts out during Phase 3 review
## Handoff
When the spec is complete (Phase 4), the next step is `/feature-sprint {slug}` — the companion skill that executes the implementation plan.Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!