Use when triage and prioritize vulnerabilities using CISA's Stakeholder-Specific
Scanned 9/8/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add oyi77/1ai-skills --skill triaging-vulnerabilities-with-ssvc-framework --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Triaging Vulnerabilities With Ssvc Framework?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/oyi77-triaging-vulnerabilities-with-ssvc-framework)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: triaging-vulnerabilities-with-ssvc-framework
description: Use when triage and prioritize vulnerabilities using CISA's Stakeholder-Specific
Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC) decision tree framework to produce actionable
remediation priorities. Use when working with triaging vulnerabilities with ssvc
framework.
domain: cybersecurity
subdomain: vulnerability-management
tags:
- ssvc
- vulnerability-triage
- cisa
- vulnerability-prioritization
- decision-tree
- cvss
- remediation
- risk-management
version: '1.0'
author: oyi77
license: Apache-2.0
nist_csf:
- ID.RA-01
- ID.RA-02
- ID.IM-02
- ID.RA-06
category: cybersecurity
---
# Triaging Vulnerabilities with SSVC Framework
## Overview
The Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC) framework, developed by Carnegie Mellon University's Software Engineering Institute (SEI) in collaboration with CISA, provides a structured decision-tree methodology for vulnerability prioritization. Unlike CVSS alone, SSVC accounts for exploitation status, technical impact, automatability, mission prevalence, and public well-being impact to produce one of four actionable outcomes: **Track**, **Track***, **Attend**, or **Act**.
## When to Use
**Trigger phrases:**
- "triaging vulnerabilities with ssvc framework"
- "Triage and prioritize vulnerabilities using CISA's Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerab"
- When managing security operations that require triaging vulnerabilities with ssvc framework
- When improving security program maturity and operational processes
- When establishing standardized procedures for security team workflows
- When integrating threat intelligence or vulnerability data into operations
## Prerequisites
- Python 3.9+ with `requests`, `pandas`, and `jinja2` libraries
- Access to CISA KEV catalog API and EPSS API from FIRST
- NVD API key (optional, for higher rate limits)
- Vulnerability scan results from tools like OpenVAS, Nessus, or Qualys
## SSVC Decision Points
This section covers ssvc decision points for triaging vulnerabilities with ssvc framework.
- Ensure all prerequisites are met before proceeding
- Follow the documented workflow steps in sequence
- Record results and any anomalies encountered during this phase
### 1. Exploitation Status
Assess current exploitation activity:
- **None** - No evidence of active exploitation
- **PoC** - Proof-of-concept exists publicly
- **Active** - Active exploitation observed in the wild (check CISA KEV)
```bash
# Check if a CVE is in CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog
curl -s "https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/feeds/known_exploited_vulnerabilities.json" | \
python3 -c "import sys,json; data=json.load(sys.stdin); cves=[v['cveID'] for v in data['vulnerabilities']]; print('Active' if 'CVE-2024-3400' in cves else 'Check PoC/None')"
```
### 2. Technical Impact
Determine scope of compromise if exploited:
- **Partial** - Limited to a subset of system functionality or data
- **Total** - Full control of the affected system, complete data access
### 3. Automatability
Evaluate if exploitation can be automated at scale:
- **No** - Requires manual, targeted exploitation per victim
- **Yes** - Can be scripted or worm-like propagation is possible
### 4. Mission Prevalence
How widespread is the affected product in your environment:
- **Minimal** - Limited deployment, non-critical systems
- **Support** - Supports mission-critical functions indirectly
- **Essential** - Directly enables core mission capabilities
### 5. Public Well-Being Impact
Potential consequences for physical safety and public welfare:
- **Minimal** - Negligible impact on safety or public services
- **Material** - Noticeable degradation of public services
- **Irreversible** - Loss of life, major property damage, or critical infrastructure failure
## SSVC Decision Outcomes
| Outcome | Action Required | SLA |
|---------|----------------|-----|
| **Track** | Monitor, remediate in normal patch cycle | 90 days |
| **Track*** | Monitor closely, prioritize in next patch window | 60 days |
| **Attend** | Escalate to senior management, accelerate remediation | 14 days |
| **Act** | Apply mitigations immediately, executive-level awareness | 48 hours |
## Workflow
1. **Scope the task** — define objectives, boundaries, and success criteria
2. **Gather information** — collect all necessary data and context before proceeding
3. **Execute the core workflow** — follow the domain-specific steps methodically
4. **Validate results** — verify outputs against expected outcomes or baselines
5. **Document findings** — record results, anomalies, and recommendations
### Step 1: Ingest Vulnerability Data
```python
import requests
import json
# Fetch CISA KEV catalog
kev_url = "https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/feeds/known_exploited_vulnerabilities.json"
kev_data = requests.get(kev_url).json()
kev_cves = {v['cveID'] for v in kev_data['vulnerabilities']}
# Fetch EPSS scores for context
epss_url = "https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss"
epss_response = requests.get(epss_url, params={"cve": "CVE-2024-3400"}).json()
```
### Step 2: Evaluate Each Decision Point
```python
def evaluate_exploitation(cve_id, kev_set):
"""Determine exploitation status from CISA KEV and EPSS data."""
if cve_id in kev_set:
return "active"
epss = requests.get(
"https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss",
params={"cve": cve_id}
).json()
if epss.get("data"):
score = float(epss["data"][0].get("epss", 0))
if score > 0.5:
return "poc"
return "none"
def evaluate_technical_impact(cvss_vector):
"""Parse CVSS vector for scope and impact metrics."""
if "S:C" in cvss_vector or "C:H/I:H/A:H" in cvss_vector:
return "total"
return "partial"
def evaluate_automatability(cvss_vector, cve_description):
"""Check if attack vector is network-based with low complexity."""
if "AV:N" in cvss_vector and "AC:L" in cvss_vector and "UI:N" in cvss_vector:
return "yes"
return "no"
```
### Step 3: Apply SSVC Decision Tree
```python
def ssvc_decision(exploitation, tech_impact, automatability, mission_prevalence, public_wellbeing):
"""CISA SSVC decision tree implementation."""
if exploitation == "active":
if tech_impact == "total" or automatability == "yes":
return "Act"
if mission_prevalence in ("essential", "support"):
return "Act"
return "Attend"
if exploitation == "poc":
if automatability == "yes" and tech_impact == "total":
return "Attend"
if mission_prevalence == "essential":
return "Attend"
return "Track*"
# exploitation == "none"
if tech_impact == "total" and mission_prevalence == "essential":
return "Track*"
return "Track"
```
### Step 4: Generate Triage Report
```bash
# Run the SSVC triage script against scan results
python3 scripts/process.py --input scan_results.csv --output ssvc_triage_report.json
# View summary
cat ssvc_triage_report.json | python3 -m json.tool | head -50
```
## Integration with Vulnerability Scanners
This section covers integration with vulnerability scanners for triaging vulnerabilities with ssvc framework.
- Ensure all prerequisites are met before proceeding
- Follow the documented workflow steps in sequence
- Record results and any anomalies encountered during this phase
### Import from Nessus CSV
```bash
# Export Nessus scan as CSV, then process
python3 scripts/process.py \
--input nessus_export.csv \
--format nessus \
--output ssvc_results.json
```
### Import from OpenVAS
```bash
# Export OpenVAS results as XML
python3 scripts/process.py \
--input openvas_report.xml \
--format openvas \
--output ssvc_results.json
```
## Validation and Testing
```bash
# Test SSVC decision logic with known CVEs
python3 -c "
from scripts.process import ssvc_decision
# CVE-2024-3400 - Palo Alto PAN-OS command injection (KEV listed)
assert ssvc_decision('active', 'total', 'yes', 'essential', 'material') == 'Act'
# CVE-2024-21887 - Ivanti Connect Secure (PoC available)
assert ssvc_decision('poc', 'total', 'yes', 'support', 'minimal') == 'Attend'
print('All SSVC decision tests passed')
"
```
## When NOT to Use
- You need to investigate the incident deeply (use IR skills)
- Task is about analyzing triaged data (use analyzing-* skills)
- You need to implement triage tools (use implementing-* skills)
- Task is about building triage infrastructure (use building-* skills)
- You don't have access to incident data
- Task requires escalation (follow escalation process)
## Red Flags
- Performing actions without explicit written authorization from the asset owner
- Testing against production systems without a defined scope and rules of engagement
- Destroying potential evidence during the containment phase
- Failing to document the chain of custody for all collected artifacts
- Communicating incident details over unencrypted or monitored channels
## Verification
- All steps executed successfully against a test environment before production use
- Output documented with screenshots or logs demonstrating expected behavior
- Timeline of events reconstructed with corroborating evidence
- Root cause identified and documented with contributing factors
- Post-incident review completed with lessons learned and action items
## References
- [CISA SSVC Framework](https://www.cisa.gov/stakeholder-specific-vulnerability-categorization-ssvc)
- [CERT/CC SSVC Documentation](https://certcc.github.io/SSVC/)
- [CISA SSVC Guide PDF](https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/publications/cisa-ssvc-guide%20508c.pdf)
- [FIRST EPSS API](https://www.first.org/epss/)
- [CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities](https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog)
## Process
1. Analyze the task requirements
2. Apply domain expertise
3. Verify output quality
## Anti-Rationalization Table
| Rationalization | Reality |
|---|---|
| "We are too small to be targeted" | Automated attacks target everyone. Size does not matter. |
| "Security slows us down" | A breach slows you down 100x more. Build security in from the start. |
| "We will fix it after launch" | Vulnerabilities in production are exploited within hours. Fix before deploy. |Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!